| Literature DB >> 31655603 |
Stefan Pettersson1,2, Fredrik Edin3, Linda Bakkman4, Kerry McGawley5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whilst the ergogenic effects of carbohydrate intake during prolonged exercise are well-documented, few investigations have studied the effects of carbohydrate ingestion during cross-country skiing, a mode of exercise that presents unique metabolic demands on athletes due to the combined use of large upper- and lower-body muscle masses. Moreover, no previous studies have investigated exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates during cross-country skiing. The current study investigated the effects of a 13C-enriched 18% multiple-transportable carbohydrate solution (1:0.8 maltodextrin:fructose) with additional gelling polysaccharides (CHO-HG) on substrate utilization and gastrointestinal symptoms during prolonged cross-country skiing exercise in the cold, and subsequent double-poling time-trial performance in ~ 20 °C.Entities:
Keywords: Biathlete; Cold; Double-poling; Endurance; Roller-skiing; Sex differences; Stabile isotopes; Substrate utilization; World-class
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31655603 PMCID: PMC6815417 DOI: 10.1186/s12970-019-0317-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr ISSN: 1550-2783 Impact factor: 5.150
Descriptive and training characteristics of the 12 participants (mean ± SD)
| Females ( | Males ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | years | 24.8 ± 5.3 | 25.6 ± 4.7 |
| Height | cm | 167.7 ± 8.0 | 181.1 ± 3.1 |
| Body mass | kg | 62.1 ± 6.4 | 75.7 ± 5.5 |
| Lean body mass | kg | 46.3 ± 5.2 | 62.3 ± 2.8** |
| Body fat | % | 21.4 ± 0.9 | 13.5 ± 4.7 |
| L·min−1 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.4** | |
| mL·kg− 1·min− 1 | 59.9 ± 2.6 | 69.1 ± 2.9** | |
| mL·kg LBM− 1·min− 1 | 81.1 ± 3.7 | 85.3 ± 6.7 | |
| Weekly training load (h)a | 17.5 ± 3.4 | 19.7 ± 2.2 | |
|
| |||
| Endurance exercise (h) | ≤ 75% HR | 12.8 ± 3.9 | 12.9 ± 4.1 |
| 75–80% HR | 1.6 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 2.9 | |
| 80–85% HR | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | |
| ≥ 85% HR | 0.9 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | |
| Gym-based strength training (h) | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 0.9 | |
LBM lean body mass, HR heart rate
aDuring the four weeks preceding the experimental trials
*Significantly different from females, P < 0.05
**Significantly different from females, P < 0.001
Fig. 1Schematic of the experimental trial day. CHO = carbohydrate, RPE = rating of perceived exertion, GI = gastrointestinal
Fig. 2Mean ± SD changes in δ 13CO2 in expired CO2 during the 120-min submaximal exercise bout. cSignificant difference between CHO-HG and PLA (P < 0.0001; n = 12)
Mean ± SD RER and substrate oxidation (g min− 1·kg LBM− 1·10− 2) during the second hour of submaximal exercise (60–120 min)
| Females ( | Males ( | All ( | Two-way ANOVA | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLA | CHO-HG | PLA | CHO-HG | PLA | CHO-HG | Time | Trial | Interaction | |
| RER | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.87 ± 0.02** | 0.85 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.01* | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.01 | 0.831 (0.011) | ||
| FAT | 95.4 ± 8.3 | 75.7 ± 7.2** | 90.0 ± 9.5 | 77.4 ± 5.5* | 92.6 ± 8.9 | 76.6 ± 6.2 | 0.749 (0.019) | ||
| CHOtotal | 199.1 ± 33.0 | 250.7 ± 30.8* | 231.4 ± 26.5 | 262.4 ± 30.5* | 215.2 ± 31.2 | 256.5 ± 29.9 | 0.875 (0.009) | 0.089 (0.177) | |
| CHOexo | – | 128.3 ± 30.2 | – | 122.1 ± 17.9 | – | 125.2 ± 23.9 | – | – | |
| CHOendo | 199.1 ± 33.0 | 122.4 ± 34.7** | 231.4 ± 26.5 | 140.3 ± 33.0* | 215.2 ± 31.2 | 131.4 ± 33.6 | |||
Significant *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.0001 main effect of trial (PLA vs. CHO-HG) for within-group comparisons (e.g., females and males, respectively); ANOVA analysis of variance, η partial Eta-squared, PLA placebo, CHO-HG carbohydrate-hydrogel, RER respiratory exchange ratio, FAT fat oxidation, CHO total carbohydrate oxidation, CHO endogenous carbohydrate oxidation, CHO exogenous carbohydrate oxidation. Significant P-value (< 0.05) is displayed in bold
Fig. 3The relative contributions of fat, endogenous carbohydrate and exogenous carbohydrate oxidation to the total energy yield during the second hour of exercise (60–120 min). PLA, placebo trial; CHO-HG, carbohydrate trial. Significant difference between CHO-HG and PLA (P < 0.05) for afemales (n = 6) and bmales (n = 6) and call athletes (n = 12)
Fig. 4Mean ± SD blood glucose (a) and lactate (b) concentrations. Significant difference between CHO-HG and PLA for afemales (n = 6) and bmales (n = 6) and call athletes (n = 12)
Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and perceptions of gastrointestinal symptoms during the 120-min submaximal exercise (n = 12)
| PLA | CHO-HG | Two-way ANOVA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range (min–max) | Mean ± SD | Range (min–max) | Time | Trial | Interaction | |
| RPE | 13.2 ± 0.9 | 11–16 | 13.3 ± 0.8 | 10–15 | 0.777 (0.008) | 0.205 (0.120) | |
| Gasa | 2.5 ± 2.7 | 0–11 | 3.4 ± 3.0 | 0–12 | 0.110 (0.215) | 0.235 (0.124) | |
| Nauseaa | 1.6 ± 2.2 | 0–10 | 2.2 ± 3.2 | 0–14 | 0.135 (0.171) | 0.511 (0.040) | 0.681 (0.028) |
| Stomach rumblinga | 2.7 ± 1.9 | 0–8 | 2.2 ± 2.0 | 0–7 | 0.069 (0.205) | 0.182 (0.156) | |
| Abdominal paina | 2.5 ± 2.7 | 0–11 | 3.5 ± 3.3 | 0–14 | 0.282 (0.104) | 0.258 (0.116) | |
| Urgency to have a bowel movementa | 2.7 ± 3.0 | 0–12 | 2.4 ± 2.7 | 0–10 | 0.394 (0.067) | 0.886 (0.016) | |
| Level of digestive comfortb | 14.6 ± 3.0 | 8–19 | 14.9 ± 2.7 | 9–20 | 0.656 (0.019) | 0.482 (0.061) | |
a0 = no symptoms, 20 = worst conceivable symptoms; b0 = extremely uncomfortable, 20 = extremely comfortable (10 = neutral); η partial Eta-square. Significant P-value (< 0.05) is displayed in bold
Fig. 5Mean ± SD time taken to complete the 2000-m TT for females (a) and 2400-m TT for males (b). PLA, placebo trial; CHO-HG, carbohydrate trial