Literature DB >> 31655187

Identification and Assessment of Breathlessness in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Helene L Elliott-Button1, Miriam J Johnson2, Ugochinyere Nwulu2, Joseph Clark2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Breathlessness is common in chronic conditions but often goes unidentified by clinicians. It is important to understand how identification and assessment of breathlessness occurs across health care settings, to promote routine outcome assessment and access to treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to summarize how breathlessness is identified and assessed in adults with chronic conditions across different health care settings.
METHODS: This is a systematic review and descriptive narrative synthesis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018089782). Searches were conducted on Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL (2000-2018) and reference lists. Screening was conducted by two independent reviewers, with access to a third, against inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a bespoke proforma.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven studies were included, conducted in primary care (n = 9), secondary care (n = 53), and specialist palliative care (n = 35). Twenty-five measures of identification and 41 measures of assessment of breathlessness were used. Primary and secondary care used a range of measures to assess breathlessness severity, cause, and impact for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Specialist palliative care used measures assessing broader symptom severity and function with less focus on overall quality of life. Few studies were identified from primary care.
CONCLUSION: Various measures were identified, reflective of the setting's purpose. However, this highlights missed opportunities for breathlessness management across settings; primary care is particularly well placed to diagnose and support breathlessness. The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease approach (where symptoms and quality of life are part of disease management) could apply to other conditions. Better documentation of holistic patient-reported measures may drive service improvement in specialist palliative care.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dyspnea; assessment; breathlessness; chronic breathlessness syndrome; identification; patient-reported outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31655187     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  3 in total

1.  Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the DEG, a Three-Item Dyspnea Measure.

Authors:  Duc M Ha; Lubin R Deng; Allison V Lange; Jeffrey J Swigris; David B Bekelman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  How Physicians in South India Recognize, Assess, and Manage People with Chronic Breathlessness Syndrome: A Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Matilda Mm Barnes-Harris; Sunitha Daniel; Chitra Venkateswaran; Ann Hutchinson; Miriam J Johnson
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2021-02-17

3.  Health service utilisation associated with chronic breathlessness: random population sample.

Authors:  David C Currow; Sungwon Chang; Magnus Ekström; Ann Hutchinson; Tim Luckett; Slavica Kochovska; Phillipa Hay; Stephen Touyz; Eleonora Dal Grande; Miriam J Johnson
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-10-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.