Literature DB >> 31655047

A single session of brief electrical stimulation enhances axon regeneration through nerve autografts.

Kevin J Zuo1, Golsa Shafa2, Kira Antonyshyn3, Katelyn Chan4, Tessa Gordon5, Gregory H Borschel6.   

Abstract

Nerve graft reconstruction of gap defects may result in poor clinical outcomes, particularly with long regeneration distances. Electrical stimulation (ES) of nerves may improve outcomes in such patients. A single session of ES at 20 Hz for 1 h significantly enhances axon regeneration in animals and human subjects after nerve crush or nerve transection and repair. The objectives of this study were to evaluate if ES enhances axon regeneration through nerve grafts and if there is added benefit of a second, delayed session of ES (serial ES) on axon regeneration as compared to a single session only of ES. In female rats, a gap defect was created in the hindlimb common peroneal (CP) nerve and immediately reconstructed with a 10 mm nerve autograft (Experiment 1) or a 20 mm nerve autograft (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, rats were randomized to 1 h of CP nerve ES or sham stimulation. In Experiment 2, rats were randomized to control (sham ES + sham ES), single ES (ES + sham ES), or serial ES (ES + ES), which consisted of an initial 1 h session of either ES or sham stimulation of the CP nerve, followed by a second 1 h session of ES or sham stimulation of the CP nerve 4 weeks later. In both experiments, after a 6 week period of nerve regeneration, CP neurons that had regenerated axons distal to the autograft were retrograde labelled for enumeration, and the CP nerve distal to the autograft was harvested for histomorphometry. In Experiment 1, rats that received CP nerve ES had statistically significantly more motor (p < .05) and sensory (p < .05) neurons that regenerated axons distal to the 10 mm nerve autograft, with more myelinated axons on histomorphometry (p < .001). Similarly, in Experiment 2, significantly more motor (p < .01) and sensory (p < .05) neurons regenerated axons distal to the 20 mm nerve autograft after a single session or two sessions of CP nerve ES. There was no significant difference in the number of regenerated motor or sensory neurons between rats with 20 mm CP nerve autografts receiving either one or two sessions of CP nerve ES (p > .05). In conclusion, a single session of ES enhances axon regeneration following nerve autografting with no added effect of a second, delayed session of ES. These findings support previous studies in animals and humans of the robust effect of a single session of ES in promoting nerve regeneration following injury and repair.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; Nerve autograft; Nerve graft; Nerve regeneration; Peripheral nerve

Year:  2019        PMID: 31655047     DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  8 in total

Review 1.  Traumatic optic neuropathy: a review of current studies.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Hengsen Zhang; Qing Zhai; Huaipeng Li; Chunxia Wang; Yong Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  The Effects of Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation on Regeneration and Recovery After Nerve Isograft Repair in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Grace C Keane; Deng Pan; Joseph Roh; Ellen L Larson; Lauren Schellhardt; Daniel A Hunter; Alison K Snyder-Warwick; Amy M Moore; Susan E Mackinnon; Matthew D Wood
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-07-15

3.  Eye Movements But Not Vision Drive the Development of Palisade Endings.

Authors:  Genova Carrero-Rojas; Paula M Calvo; Thomas Lischka; Johannes Streicher; Rosa R de la Cruz; Angel M Pastor; Roland Blumer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

4.  Neuronal androgen receptor is required for activity dependent enhancement of peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Patricia J Ward; Rachel A Davey; Jeffrey D Zajac; Arthur W English
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 5.  Neuro-Muscular Dentistry: the "diamond" concept of electro-stimulation potential for stomato-gnathic and oro-dental conditions.

Authors:  Catalina P Sandoval-Munoz; Ziyad S Haidar
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Optical tissue clearing enables rapid, precise and comprehensive assessment of three-dimensional morphology in experimental nerve regeneration research.

Authors:  Simeon C Daeschler; Jennifer Zhang; Tessa Gordon; Gregory H Borschel
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  In vitro study of decellularized rat tissues for nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Kai Ye; Andong He; Miaoben Wu; Xiaodong Qiu; Zhiwu Chen; Jun Yin; Qinghua Song; Yi Huang; Kailei Xu; Yuye Huang; Peng Wei
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 8.  Restoration of Neurological Function Following Peripheral Nerve Trauma.

Authors:  Damien P Kuffler; Christian Foy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.