Literature DB >> 31655020

Impact of the addition of azithromycin to antimalarials used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention on antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Soumeya Hema-Ouangraoua1,2, Abdoul Aziz Maiga3, Matthew Cairns4, Issaka Zongo2, Nikiema Frédéric2, Rakiswendé Serge Yerbanga2, Boubou Tamboura3, Henry Badji3, Georgia Gore-Langton4, Irene Kuepfer4, Halidou Tinto2, Issaka Sagara5, Alassane Dicko5, Samba O Sow5, Daniel Chandrahoman4, Brian Greenwood4, Jean Bosco Ouedraogo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A trial was conducted in Burkina Faso and Mali to investigate whether addition of azithromycin to the antimalarials used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention reduces mortality and hospital admissions of children. We tested the sensitivity of nasal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae obtained during this trial to azithromycin and other antibiotics.
METHODS: Azithromycin or placebo was administered monthly, in combination with the antimalarials used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention, for four months, over the annual malaria transmission seasons of 2014, 2015, and 2016. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 2773 Burkinabe and 2709 Malian children on seven occasions: in July and December each year prior to and after drug administration, and at a final survey in early 2018. Pneumococci were isolated from nasopharyngeal swabs and tested for sensitivity to azithromycin and other antibiotics.
RESULTS: A total of 5482 samples were collected. In Burkina Faso, the percentage of pneumococcal isolates resistant to azithromycin among children who had received it increased from 4.9% (95% CI: 2.4%, 9.9%) before the intervention to 25.6% (95% CI: 17.6%, 35.7%) afterward. In Mali, the increase was from 7.6% (95% CI: 3.8%, 14.4%) to 68.5% (95% CI: 55.1%, 79.4%). The percentage of resistant isolates remained elevated (17.7% (95% CI: 11.1%, 27.1%) in Burkina Faso and 19.1% (95% CI: 13.5%, 26.3%) in Mali) among children who had received azithromycin 1 year after stopping the intervention. An increase in resistance to azithromycin was also observed in children who had received a placebo but it was less marked.
CONCLUSION: Addition of azithromycin to the antimalarial combination used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention was associated with an increase in resistance of pneumococci to azithromycin and erythromycin, which persisted 1 year after the last administration of azithromycin.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Afrique subsaharienne; Sub-Saharan Africa; azithromycin; azithromycine; pneumococcal carriage; portage de pneumocoque; resistance; résistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31655020      PMCID: PMC7687265          DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Med Int Health        ISSN: 1360-2276            Impact factor:   2.622


Introduction

In Burkina Faso and Mali, malaria continues to be a burden with a large number of cases and high mortality rates despite control efforts. In 2016, WHO estimated 7.9 million malaria cases with 21 300 fatalities in Burkina Faso and 7.2 million cases with 12 400 fatalities in Mali 1. Malaria is highly seasonal; 60% to 80% of cases occur during the raining season in both countries. Mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin (AZ) is being widely deployed as a highly effective method for the control of trachoma 2. The incidence of respiratory, gastrointestinal and skin infections, and malaria 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 is lower in children who participated in mass AZ campaigns. An additional, surprising finding was detection of a more than 50% reduction in mortality in children who participated in an AZ MDA program in Ethiopia, a reduction that was sustained over a period of 26 months 9, 10. This unexpected finding led to the MORDOR (Macrolides Oraux pour Réduire les Décès avec un Oeil sur la Résistance) trial, which investigated the impact of two rounds of AZ MDA on mortality in children under the age of 5 years in Malawi, Niger, and Tanzania 11. An overall reduction in mortality of 13.5 % was observed, with the reduction being most marked in Niger and in children under the age of 1 year. On the basis of the findings of the study in Ethiopia, we hypothesized that adding AZ to the antimalarial combination sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine and amodiaquine (SP + AQ) used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) would further reduce child mortality and severe morbidity, and we conducted a trial in 19 200 children aged 3–59 months in Burkina Faso and Mali to investigate this hypothesis. Modest reductions in the incidence of gastrointestinal, respiratory tract and skin infections, and non‐malaria fevers were seen, but the addition of AZ to the antimalarial used for SMC had no impact on child mortality or hospital admissions 12. A concern over the use of AZ for MDA programs is that this will enhance resistance to macrolide antibiotics. An increase in the resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to AZ has been observed in several MDA studies, although this has often been only short term 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. An increase in resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to AZ after MDA for trachoma control has also been reported 20. For these reasons, the antibiotic sensitivity of nasopharyngeal isolates of S. pneumoniae was studied during the SMC + AZ trial and the results from this study are presented in this paper.

Methods

Design and conduct of the SMC + AZ trial

Details of the trial in Burkina Faso and Mali to investigate the impact of adding AZ to the antimalarial drugs used for SMC have been published previously 12. In brief, 19 200 children aged 3–59 months were randomised to receive SP and AQ with either AZ or placebo. Randomization was by household. Infants aged 3–11 months received SP 250 mg/12.5 mg and AQ 75 mg on day 1 and AQ 75 mg on days 2 and 3. In addition, they received AZ 100 mg or matching AZ placebo on days 1, 2, and 3. Children aged 1–4 years received double these doses. SP + AQ was supplied by Guilin Pharmaceutical (Shanghai, China), and AZ and matching placebo were supplied by CIPLA (Mumbai, India). All doses of treatments were given by trial staff. Coverage with the monthly treatments was high, with more than 80% of children receiving three or four rounds of treatment each year. Deaths, hospital admissions, and attendances at clinics were recorded throughout the study period as described earlier 12. Cross‐sectional surveys were undertaken at the end of each malaria transmission season. The overall outline of the study is shown in Figure S1.

Nasopharyngeal carriage surveys

Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 2773 Burkinabe and 2709 Malian children at cross‐sectional surveys at seven time points. Children were randomly selected by an independent statistician, with a new sample drawn for each time point. Swabs were collected in July 2014, 2015, and 2016 just before the first round of AZ or placebo was given and in December of each of these years 4–6 weeks after the last round of AZ or placebo had been given (hereafter referred to as pre‐ and post‐2014 etc.). Swab samples were also taken early in 2018, 1 year after the last administration of AZ or placebo. Randomized children were gathered in a health facility and trained staff took samples on‐site while completing the required documents. A sample was taken from the posterior wall of the child's nasopharynx using a calcium alginate swab (FLOQSwabs, Copan Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA) and immediately transferred to a cryotube containing skimmed milk‐tryptone‐glucose‐glycerol medium (STGG). The cryotubes were labeled and placed in a cold box prior to transfer to the laboratory within 8 h of collection and stored at −80 °C until analyzed 21, 22.

Laboratory methods

Standard protocols for the analysis of nasopharyngeal samples were used 21; these are described in the supplement.

Statistical analysis

The primary study endpoint was the prevalence of nasal carriage isolates of S. pneumoniae resistant to <span class="Chemical">AZ at the seven time points described above. A secondary endpoint was the overall prevalence of <span class="Disease">pneumococcal carriage in the two intervention groups at the same time points. Exploratory endpoints included the analysis of the sensitivity of pneumococci to other antibiotics.

Sample size

A sample size of 400 <span class="Species">children per survey per country was chosen for the nasopharyngeal substudy on the basis that the <span class="Disease">pneumococcal carriage prevalence would be 50%, and thus, 200 samples would be positive and available for resistance assays at each survey in each country. Assuming that the prevalence of resistance was 50% among the 200 samples available for resistance assays, the precision of the estimate of resistance for each country, at each time point, would be within 15% of the true value.

Trial oversight

The trial was approved by ethics committees of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, of the <span class="Disease">Malaria Research and Training Centre, Bamako, and of the Ministry of Health in Ouagadougou. The trial was also approved by the national regulatory authorities in Burkina Faso and Mali, and registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02211729). Written consent was obtained from parents or guardians for inclusion of a child in the overall trial, and further consent was obtained from parents or guardians of children selected for the pneumococcal carriage substudy. A data safety monitoring board reviewed serious adverse events and monitored the trial's overall progress. An international steering committee reviewed the protocol and provided advice throughout the course of the study.

Results

Study population and samples

A total of 5482 nasopharyngeal specimens were collected, 2773 from children in Houndé, Burkina Faso (1379 from the AZ and 1394 from the placebo group) and 2709 from children in Bougouni, Mali (1346 from the AZ and 1363 from the placebo group). Sex and age distribution of study children were well balanced between the AZ and placebo groups, and the prevalence of pneumococcal carriage was comparable in each group at baseline in both countries (Tables 1 and 2). The numbers of swabs obtained at each survey and tested for antibiotic resistance are shown in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 1

General characteristics of children in the two study groups (Burkina Faso)

CharacteristicPercentage (n) of children by survey and country
Pre‐2014 (N = 430)Post‐2014 (N = 418)Pre‐2015 (N = 401)Post‐2015 (N = 388)Pre‐2016 (N = 385)Post‐2016 (N = 396)2018 (N = 355)
SMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZ
Total children (n)213217213205196205197191192193201195182173
Male % (n)53.1 (112)47.5 (103)50.2 (107)47.3 (97)53.1 (104)55.1 (113)50.3 (99)45.0 (86)54.2 (104)54.9 (106)50.75 (102)53.9 (105)52.8 (96)53.8 (93)
Age
<12 months21.6 (46)24.0 (52)11.3 (24)10.2 (21)15.8 (31)12.7 (26)7.6 (15)8.9 (17)16.7 (32)13.0 (25)8.0 (16)8.7 (17)0.0 (0)0.0 (0)
12–23 months17.4 (37)17.5 (38)20.7 (44)20.5 (42)15.3 (30)25.9 (53)25.4 (50)20.9 (40)16.2 (31)24.4 (47)24.9 (50)26.2 (51)0.0 (0)0.0 (0)
24–35 months23.0 (49)23.5 (51)21.1 (45)21.5 (44)24.0 (47)20.0 (41)22.3 (44)23.6 (45)22.9 (44)22.3 (43)19.4 (39)21.5 (42)20.3 (37)20.2 (35)
36–47 months19.7 (42)16.6 (36)21.1 (45)20.0 (41)22.4 (44)21.5 (44)20.8 (41)25.7 (49)25.0 (48)19.2 (37)20.4 (41)14.4 (28)18.7 (34)20.2 (35)
48 months+18.3 (39)18.4 (40)25.8 (55)27.8 (57)22.4 (44)20.0 (41)23.9 (47)20.9 (40)19.3 (37)21.2 (41)27.4 (55)29.2 (57)61.0 (111)* 59.5 (103)*
PCV vaccination % (n)NANANANA64.2 (43)52.3 (34)57.9 (33)71.2 (42)95.2 (99)89.4 (93)87.0 (87)87.0 (80)NANA
n missingNANANANA1291401401328889101103NANA
Recent antibiotic use % (n)NANA6.10 (13)5.85 (12)8.67 (17)14.6 (30)6.60 (13)6.28 (12)6.77 (13)6.74 (13)4.48 (9)4.10 (8)NANA
Number with recent illnessNANA20184350191932381612NANA
Antibiotic use if recent illness % (n)NANA65.0 (13)66.7 (12)39.5 (17)60.0 (30)68.4 (13)63.2 (12)40.6 (13)34.2 (13)56.3 (9)66.7 (8)NANA
Pneumococcal carriage % (n)69.0 (147)65.9 (143)69.5 (148)55.1 (113)57.7 (113)50.2 (103)72.6 (143)64.9 (124)53.7 (103)49.7 (96)49.3 (99)44.1 (86)64.3 (117)55.5 (96)
Prevalence Ratio (95% CI)0.95 (0.84, 1.09)0.79 (0.68, 0.92)0.87 (0.73, 1.05)0.89 (0.78, 1.02)0.93 (0.76, 1.12)0.90 (0.72, 1.11)0.86 (0.73, 1.03)
P‐value0.4980.0030.1410.1040.4420.3110.095

SMC + AZ, seasonal malaria chemoprevention with azithromycin; SMC + P, seasonal malaria chemoprevention with placebo; PCV, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

In 2018 survey, the age category ‘48 months+’ includes children up to 6 years of age due to this survey being conducted 1 year after administration of the last SMC round.

Table 2

General characteristics of children in the two study groups (Mali)

CharacteristicPercentage (n) of children by survey and country
Pre‐2014 (N = 342)Post‐2014 (N = 407)Pre‐2015 (N = 399)Post‐2015 (N = 395)Pre‐2016 (N = 381)Post‐2016 (N = 385)2018 (N = 400)
SMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZSMC + PSMC + AZ
Total children (n)174168203204205194197198190191187198207193
Male % (n)53.5 (93)54.8 (92)50.3 (102)51.0 (104)50.2 (103)48.5 (94)45.2 (89)57.1 (113)56.3 (107)50.3 (96)45.5 (85)60.1 (119)47.3 (98)59.1 (114)
Age
<12 months13.8 (24)11.3 (19)10.8 (22)11.8 (24)11.7 (24)12.9 (25)7.6 (15)11.6 (23)13.7 (26)12.6 (24)9.6 (18)9.1 (18)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
12–23 months18.4 (32)22.6 (38)21.2 (43)20.6 (42)20.5 (42)24.2 (47)18.3 (36)16.2 (32)17.4 (33)25.7 (49)19.8 (37)21.2 (42)5.3 (11)5.7 (11)
24–35 months21.3 (37)19.6 (33)22.2 (45)21.1 (43)19.5 (40)20.6 (40)23.4 (46)24.2 (48)24.7 (47)17.3 (33)23.0 (43)23.7 (47)22.7 (47)21.2 (41)
36–47 months27.0 (47)23.2 (39)23.6 (48)23.0 (47)24.9 (51)19.6 (38)22.3 (44)21.7 (43)24.2 (46)22.0 (42)21.9 (41)21.7 (43)21.7 (45)21.2 (41)
48 months+19.5 (34)23.2 (39)22.2 (45)23.5 (48)23.4 (48)22.7 (44)28.4 (56)26.3 (52)20.0 (38)22.5 (43)25.7 (48)24.2 (48)50.2 (104)* 51.8 (100)*
PCV vaccination % (n)NANANANA95.0 (151)92.8 (129)91.5 (139)95.6 (153)93.8 (151)97.0 (164)95.7 (154)95.8 (158)NANA
n missingNANANANA4655453829222633NANA
Recent antibiotic use % (n)NANA9.85 (20)6.86 (14)9.76 (20)11.9 (23)9.64 (19)8.08 (16)7.37 (14)7.85 (15)10.2 (19)10.1 (20)NANA
Number with recent illnessNANA30254247313660543336NANA
Antibiotic use if recent illness % (n)0.0 (0)0.0 (0)66.7 (20)56.0 (14)47.6 (50)48.9 (23)61.3 (19)44.4 (16)23.3 (14)27.8 (15)57.6 (19)55.6 (20)NANA
Pneumococcal carriage % (n)63.2 (110)63.7 (107)56.2 (114)58.8 (120)53.7 (110)56.7 (110)72.6 (143)67.7 (134)25.8 (49)28.3 (54)50.3 (94)31.0 (61)90.8 (188)85.5 (165)
Prevalence Ratio (95% CI)1.01 (0.85, 1.19)1.05 (0.89, 1.24)1.06 (0.88, 1.27)0.93 (0.82, 1.06)1.10 (0.79, 1.53)0.62 (0.47, 0.80)0.94 (0.88, 1.01)
P‐value0.9290.5880.5500.2820.586<0.0010.096

SMC + AZ, seasonal malaria chemoprevention with azithromycin; SMC + P, seasonal malaria chemoprevention with placebo; PCV = pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

In 2018 survey, the age category ‘48 months+’ includes children up to 6 years of age due to this survey being conducted 1 year after administration of the last SMC round.

Table 3

The prevalence of azithromycin (AZ) and erythromycin (ERY) resistance in nasopharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Burkina Faso

 SurveySMC + PlaceboSMC + AzithromycinPrevalence Ratio (95% CI) P‐value
Carriage (n)Tested (n)Resistant (n)Prevalence (%)Carriage(n)Tested (n)Resistant (n)Prevalence (%)
Azithromycin disk assayPre‐201414714732.0414314374.902.40 (0.63, 9.13)0.199
Post‐201414814885.411131131412.42.29 (0.98, 5.37)0.056
Pre‐201511311354.4210310387.771.76 (0.59, 5.21)0.311
Post‐20151431431913.31241242520.21.52 (0.88, 2.62)0.134
Pre‐20161031031110.7969699.380.88 (0.38, 2.03)0.761
Post‐201699991313.186862225.61.95 (1.05, 3.61)0.034
20181171171916.296961717.71.09 (0.59, 2.03)0.785
Azithromycin E‐testPre‐201414714742.7214314353.501.28 (0.35, 4.71)0.705
Post‐201414814885.411131131513.32.46 (1.06, 5.68)0.036
Pre‐201511311376.191031031211.71.88 (0.77, 4.61)0.167
Post‐20151431432215.91241243024.21.57 (0.96, 2.58)0.073
Pre‐2016* 103121191.7* 9699100* NA
Post‐2016* 99671826.9* 86673044.8* NA
20181171172117.996961818.81.04 (0.58, 1.88)0.884
Erythromycin disk assayPre‐201414714732.0414314374.902.40 (0.63, 9.13)0.199
Post‐201414814885.411131131412.42.29 (0.98, 5.37)0.056
Pre‐201511311354.4210310387.771.76 (0.59, 5.21)0.311
Post‐20151431431812.61241242721.81.73 (1.00, 2.99)0.049
Pre‐20161031031110.7969699.380.88 (0.38, 2.03)0.761
Post‐201699991313.186862124.41.86 (1.00, 3.47)0.051
20181171171714.596961717.71.22 (0.64, 2.32)0.548

In 2016, the azithromycin E‐test was used only to confirm samples positive by the azithromycin disk assay, not to test all samples. Consequently, a prevalence ratio cannot be calculated, and the values in the ‘Prevalence’ column for the placebo and AZ groups should be interpreted as ‘the percentage of samples positive by disk assay that were also found to be positive by E‐test’.

Table 4

The prevalence of azithromycin (AZ) and erythromycin (ERY) resistance in nasopharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Mali

 SurveySMC + PlaceboSMC + AzithromycinPrevalence Ratio (95% CI) P‐value
Carriage (n)Tested (n)Resistant (n)Prevalence (%)Carriage(n)Tested (n)Resistant (n)Prevalence (%)
Azithromycin disk assayPre‐201411010943.6710710687.552.06 (0.64, 6.62)0.227
Post‐201411411365.311201171311.12.09 (0.81, 5.43)0.129
Pre‐201511011076.3611011054.550.71 (0.23, 2.20)0.558
Post‐201514314342.80134134107.462.67 (0.86, 8.27)0.089
Pre‐2016* 4934823.5* 5440820.0* 0.85 (0.36, 2.02)* 0.713
Post‐2016* 94812530.9* 61543768.5* 2.22 (1.51, 3.27)* <0.001
20181881803117.2* 1651522919.1* 1.11(0.69, 1.77)* 0.669
Azithromycin E‐testPre‐2014 110000.00 10722100 NA
Post‐2014 11466100 1201313100 NA
Pre‐2015 11077100 11055100 NA
Post‐2015 14344100 1341111100 NA
Pre‐2016 498562.5 548562.5 NA
Post‐2016 94251768.0 61362775.0 NA
2018188363494.4 1652929100.0 NA
Erythromycin disk assayPre‐201411010943.6710710687.552.06 (0.64, 6.62)0.227
Post‐201411411365.311201171311.12.09 (0.81, 5.43)0.129
Pre‐201511011076.3611011054.550.71 (0.23, 2.20)0.558
Post‐201514314342.80134134128.963.20 (1.06, 9.65)0.039
Pre‐2016* 4934411.8* 5440922.5* 1.91 (0.64, 5.75)* 0.248
Post‐2016* 94812328.4* 61533566.0* 2.33 (1.54, 3.51)* <0.001
20181881802715.0* 1651522516.4* 1.10 (0.66, 1.83)* 0.726

In 2016 and 2018, not all positive samples were tested by disk assay; prevalences and prevalence ratios reflect the prevalence among those samples that were tested.

The azithromycin E‐test was used only to confirm samples positive by the azithromycin disk assay, not to test all samples. Consequently, a prevalence ratio cannot be calculated, and the values in the ‘Prevalence’ column for the placebo and AZ groups should be interpreted as ‘the percentage of samples positive by disk assay that were also found to be positive by E‐test’.

General characteristics of <span class="Species">children in the two study groups (Burkina Faso) SMC + AZ, seasonal malaria chemoprevention with azithromycin; SMC + P, seasonal malaria chemoprevention with placebo; PCV, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. In 2018 survey, the age category ‘48 months+’ includes <span class="Species">children up to 6 years of age due to this survey being conducted 1 year after administration of the last <span class="Chemical">SMC round. General characteristics of <span class="Species">children in the two study groups (Mali) SMC + AZ, seasonal malaria chemoprevention with azithromycin; SMC + P, seasonal malaria chemoprevention with placebo; PCV = pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. In 2018 survey, the age category ‘48 months+’ includes <span class="Species">children up to 6 years of age due to this survey being conducted 1 year after administration of the last <span class="Chemical">SMC round. The prevalence of azithromycin (AZ) and erythromycin (ERY) resistance in nasopharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Burkina Faso In 2016, the azithromycin E‐test was used only to confirm samples positive by the azithromycin disk assay, not to test all samples. Consequently, a prevalence ratio cannot be calculated, and the values in the ‘Prevalence’ column for the placebo and AZ groups should be interpreted as ‘the percentage of samples positive by disk assay that were also found to be positive by E‐test’. The prevalence of azithromycin (AZ) and erythromycin (ERY) resistance in nasopharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Mali In 2016 and 2018, not all positive samples were tested by disk assay; prevalences and prevalence ratios reflect the prevalence among those samples that were tested. The azithromycin E‐test was used only to confirm samples positive by the azithromycin disk assay, not to test all samples. Consequently, a prevalence ratio cannot be calculated, and the values in the ‘Prevalence’ column for the placebo and AZ groups should be interpreted as ‘the percentage of samples positive by disk assay that were also found to be positive by E‐test’. A history of consumption of antibiotics other than AZ in the 30 days prior to the collection of a swab was reported by 4.1–14.6% of children in Burkina Faso and by 6.9–11.9% of children in Mali in different surveys (Table 1). Antibiotic use among the subset of children with a recent morbidity episode was higher, often exceeding 50%. Amoxicillin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic, accounting for 120 of the 140 (85.7%) reported antibiotic treatments of participants in Burkina Faso and for 112 of 180 (62.2%) treatments in Mali. Erythromycin (10.0% of antibiotic treatments), co‐trimoxazole (10.6%), and metronidazole (21.7%) were also commonly used in Mali. Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13) vaccination was introduced into the Expanded Programme of Immunization in 2013 in Burkina Faso and in 2011 in Mali. Vaccination cards were often not available at the time of the annual census of all children in the trial. Vaccine coverage with PCV13 in Burkina Faso among children whose vaccine status was known was 58.3% when first measured before the 2015 malaria transmission season, but improved substantially in 2016 (Table 1). In Mali, PCV vaccine coverage was >90% at all survey contacts.

Prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae

The overall prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of S. pneumoniae at baseline was 67.4% in Burkina Faso and 63.5% in Mali (Tables 1 and 2; Figure 1a,b). Overall carriage remained >50% at the five subsequent surveys during the study period, with the exception of the post‐2016 survey, when overall carriage was 46.7% in Burkina Faso and 40.4% in Mali. Carriage was generally lower in the <span class="Chemical">AZ group in Burkina Faso but differences between the two study groups were not marked, with overlapping confidence intervals, apart from two occasions when prevalence was significantly lower in the <span class="Chemical">AZ group: post‐2014 in Burkina Faso, with a prevalence ratio (PR) of 0.79 (0.68, 0.92; P = 0.003), and post‐2016 in Mali (PR 0.62 (0.47, 0.80), P < 0.001).
Figure 1

The prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae in three annual pre‐ and post‐intervention surveys and 1 year after the last post‐intervention survey. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

The prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of <span class="Species">Streptococcus pneumoniae in three annual pre‐ and post‐intervention surveys and 1 year after the last post‐intervention survey. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] One year after the last administration of SMC with AZ, the prevalence of pneumococcal carriage was 60.0% in Burkina Faso (Table 1 and Figure 1a) and slightly lower in the group that had previously received AZ than in the placebo group (PR 0.86 (0.73, 1.03); P = 0.095). In Mali, the prevalence of pneumococcal carriage was 88.3% one year after the last administration of SMC with AZ (Table 2 and Figure 1b), again slightly but not markedly lower in the group that received AZ (PR 0.94 (0.88, 1.01); P = 0.096). Because of the unexpectedly high isolation rate in the last survey conducted in Mali, these samples were retested and a high isolation rate was confirmed (Table S1).

Resistance of pharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumonia to azithromycin

At baseline, the overall prevalence of resistance to <span class="Chemical">AZ among nasopharyngeal isolates of S. pneumoniae assessed using a disk diffusion assay was low in each country (3.4% in Burkina Faso and 5.6% in Mali). In Burkina Faso, the prevalence of <span class="Chemical">AZ resistance at baseline was 3.1% using the E‐test (Figure 2a,b). In Mali, the E‐test was used only to confirm resistance in positive samples identified by the disk diffusion assay and, at baseline, only two samples were tested, both of which were positive with each assay.
Figure 2

The prevalence of resistance to azithromycin among nasopharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus. pneumoniae in three annual pre‐ and post‐intervention surveys and 1 year after the last post‐intervention survey was done (a) Burkina Faso and (b) Mali*. Results from disk diffusion assays. *In Mali in 2016, not all positive samples were tested by disk assay; prevalences reflect the percentage positive among those samples that were tested. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

The prevalence of resistance to <span class="Chemical">azithromycin among nasopharyngeal isolates of <span class="Species">Streptococcus. pneumoniae in three annual pre‐ and post‐intervention surveys and 1 year after the last post‐intervention survey was done (a) Burkina Faso and (b) Mali*. Results from disk diffusion assays. *In Mali in 2016, not all positive samples were tested by disk assay; prevalences reflect the percentage positive among those samples that were tested. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] In Burkina Faso, results obtained using the disk diffusion assay showed that the prevalence of resistance to AZ increased over time in both study groups, reaching approximately 10% or more from the post‐2015 survey onwards. Prevalence was higher in the AZ group at each of the first six surveys, apart from the pre‐2016 survey, although differences were only marked at two time points: post‐2014 and post‐2016 (PR 2.29 (0.98, 5.37), (P = 0.056) and PR 1.95 (1.05, 3.61), (P = 0.034), respectively). One year after the last administration of AZ or placebo, the prevalence of resistance was markedly higher than the prevalence seen at baseline: 16.2% in the placebo group and 17.7% in the AZ group. Similar results were obtained with the AZ E‐test (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, UK), although due to a shortage of test strips in 2016, not all samples positive for carriage could be tested at the pre‐2016 and post‐2016 surveys. In Mali, the prevalence of AZ resistance according to the disk diffusion assay increased relative to baseline but remained below 10% in 2014 and 2015. The prevalence of AZ resistance exceeded 20% in both groups at both the pre‐2016 and post‐2016 surveys and was markedly higher in the AZ group at the post‐2016 survey: PR 2.22 (1.51, 3.27); P < 0.001). At the first four surveys (pre‐2014 to post‐2015), all samples positive by disk assay were confirmed positive by E‐test; approximately two‐thirds of samples positive by disk assay were confirmed to be positive by E‐test at the 2016 surveys. Because of the very high level of resistance to AZ found in the post‐2016 survey, these samples were retested and a high level of concordance between the two sets of testing was found (Table S2). Analysis of changes in the pattern of resistance to <span class="Chemical">AZ over time by age group did not show any age effect in either Burkina Faso or Mali (Figure S2).

Resistance of pharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae to erythromycin

Resistance to erythromycin, assessed with a disk diffusion assay, showed a very similar pattern to that seen for AZ (Figures S3 and S4). In Burkina Faso, the prevalence of resistance increased from a prevalence at baseline of 3.5%, exceeding approximately 10% at all time points after the post‐2015 survey. The prevalence of resistance was higher in the AZ than in the placebo group at all but one survey, but there was only weak statistical evidence of a true difference on two occasions: PR 1.73 (1.00, 2.99; P = 0.049) at the post‐2015 survey, and PR 1.86 (1.00, 3.47; P = 0.051) at the post‐2016 survey. There was no evidence of a difference persisting between the groups at the 2018 survey. In Mali, the results for erythromycin also closely mirrored those obtained for AZ: There was a relatively slow increase in the prevalence of resistance during the first 2 years of the study, but from 2016 onwards the overall prevalence of resistance exceeded 10%. Prevalence was higher in the AZ group at all but one time point, with evidence of a true difference between the study groups in the post‐2015 survey [PR 3.20 (1.06, 9.65; P = 0.039)] and strong evidence of a true difference at the post‐2016 survey [PR 2.33 (1.54, 3.51; P < 0.001)]. At the 2018 survey, the prevalence of erythromycin resistance had dropped below 17% in both study groups and there was no evidence of a difference between groups.

Resistance of pharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin

In Burkina Faso, the E‐test was used to determine sensitivity to <span class="Chemical">penicillin. The overall prevalence of resistance at the first survey was 13.5%; during the remainder of the study period, this ranged between a low of 5.1% at the pre‐2015 survey and a high of 22.5% at the post‐2015 survey, with no evidence of any difference between the study groups (Table 5). At the 2018 survey, the overall prevalence was 25.8%, again with no difference between study groups [PR 1.09 (0.69, 1.73; P = 0.71)].
Table 5

The prevalence of resistance in nasopharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin and oxacillin in Burkina Faso and Mali

 SurveySMC + PlaceboSMC + AzithromycinPrevalence Ratio (95% CI P‐value
Carriage (n)Tested (n)Resistant (n)Prevalence (%)Carriage (n)Tested (n)Resistant (n)Prevalence (%)
Burkina Faso
Oxacillin disk assayPre‐20141471473725.21431433423.80.94 (0.63, 1.42)0.783
Post‐20141481483825.71131131815.90.62 (0.37, 1.03)0.064
Pre‐20151131134438.91031033534.00.87 (0.61, 1.24)0.452
Post‐20151431434430.81241243326.60.86 (0.59, 1.26)0.454
Pre‐20161031033937.996962728.10.74 (0.50, 1.11)0.150
Post‐201699993333.386863034.91.05 (0.70, 1.57)0.826
20181171174034.296963637.51.10 (0.76, 1.57)0.616
Penicillin E‐testPre‐20141471471912.91431432014.01.08 (0.60, 1.94)0.791
Post‐20141481482114.21131131614.21.00 (0.54, 1.84)0.995
Pre‐201511311354.410310365.81.32 (0.41, 4.20)0.642
Post‐20151431433323.11241242721.80.94 (0.60, 1.48)0.799
Pre‐20161031031716.596961919.81.20 (0.66, 2.17)0.549
Post‐201699991111.186861214.01.26 (0.58, 2.70)0.559
20181171172924.896962627.11.09 (0.69, 1.73)0.705
Mali
Oxacillin disk assayPre‐20141101094541.31071054038.10.92 (0.66, 1.29)0.639
Post‐20141141131715.01201171815.41.02 (0.55, 1.91)0.944
Pre‐20151101102119.11101101816.40.86 (0.49, 1.51)0.596
Post‐20151431433222.41341341813.40.60 (0.35, 1.02)0.057
Pre‐201649341544.154401127.50.62 (0.33, 1.18)0.145
Post‐201694803240.061532343.41.08 (0.73, 1.62)0.692
20181881804625.61651523523.00.90 (0.61, 1.32)0.593
The prevalence of resistance in nasopharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin and oxacillin in Burkina Faso and Mali

Resistance of pharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae to other antibiotics

Resistance to ceftriaxone, norfloxacin, and vancomycin was measured only in isolates obtained in Burkina Faso. Overall, a very low prevalence of resistance to ceftriaxone was found using either a disk diffusion method or an E‐test over the whole study period (0.61% and 0.31% respectively). Resistance to norfloxacin, tested with a disk diffusion test, was slightly more frequent and found in 85 samples (5.3% of those tested) over the study period, ranging from 11 positives (3.8% of those tested) at baseline to a low prevalence at the end of the study period, with only one positive at the post‐2016 survey and three positives at the 2018 survey. No resistance to vancomycin was found in any of the 1633 isolates tested.

Discussion

This study evaluated the impact of AZ, combined with SMC, given once a month for 4 months (August to November) over a 3‐year period (2014–2016) on the resistance of S. pneumoniae to AZ. This was a more intense treatment schedule than that used in previous MDA studies employing AZ for control of trachoma 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23. The two regions of Houndé in Burkina Faso and Bougouni in Mali had received the last distribution of AZ (Zithromax) for control of trachoma in 2007 and 2011, respectively, and this is, therefore, unlikely to have affected the results of this study 24. The overall prevalence of carriage of S. pneumoniae declined modestly over time in children who had received either AZ or placebo with the exception of an unexpected increase in the 2018 survey in Mali; this increase was confirmed on retesting so is likely to be a true, but unexplained, finding. Carriage tended to be lower in the AZ group than in the placebo group, but apart from two time points (post‐2014 in Burkina Faso and post‐2016 in Mali), differences were not large and may have been due to chance. In both Burkina Faso and Mali, resistance of pharyngeal isolates of S. pneumoniae to AZ and erythromycin increased substantially during the course of the study and this persisted for a year after the last drug administration. This contrasts with the findings in most other studies in which the prevalence of resistance has usually returned close to baseline at surveys some months after the last drug administration 16, 18. There was strong statistical evidence of a difference between the AZ and placebo groups only at the post‐2015 survey in Burkina Faso and at the post‐2016 survey in Mali. Although study children were randomized by household, rather than individually, there may have been sufficient mixing between young children in neighboring households to dilute differences between the intervention groups; a cluster‐randomized village trial might have found more marked differences between study groups. As expected, patterns of resistance to erythromycin matched those seen for AZ. A modest level of resistance to penicillin, as assessed by the E‐test, was found but resistance to other antibiotics tested was rare. Incorporation of AZ into the SMC treatment regimen did not have any significant impact on deaths or hospital admission due to non‐traumatic causes but addition of AZ did reduced the incidence of visits to a health facility or community health worker due to an acute respiratory tract, gastrointestinal or skin infection, and of non‐malaria fever by about 20% 11. These gains will need to be balanced against the costs of adding AZ to the SMC regimen, currently being assessed, and against the risk of inducing widespread resistance of S. pneumoniae, and perhaps other bacterial pathogens, including gastrointestinal pathogens, to macrolide antibiotics. Erythromycin and (particularly) AZ are currently used infrequently for treatment of young children at government‐supported clinics in the study areas, but they may be prescribed more frequently in pharmacies and private clinics and their loss to the list of effective and affordable antibiotics would be a significant one. This study has some weaknesses. Although efforts were made to standardize laboratory procedures in Burkina Faso and Mali, some differences in methods emerged, in part because of difficulties in obtaining reagents at the appropriate time. Hence, it was decided to undertake separate analyses in each country rather than merging the data. Nevertheless, very similar results were found in each country. In addition, data on coverage with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine were not recorded for each study participant, but the information that was available indicates that a high proportion had received at least one dose of this vaccine. Policymakers are currently considering the potential of widespread deployment of AZ mass drug administration as an infant survival strategy in countries where infant mortality remains high. The results of this study suggest that the potential for inducing resistance to macrolide antibiotics in important pathogens will need to be taken into consideration when policy decisions are being made on the costs and benefits of this intervention. Figure S1. Schematic showing timing of surveys for <span class="Disease">pneumococcal sampling in relation to study interventions and the <span class="Disease">malaria transmission seasons. Click here for additional data file. Figure S2. Results of resistance to <span class="Chemical">azithromycin by age obtained during three annual pre‐and post‐intervention surveys and 1 year after the last post‐intervention survey was done in Burkina Faso (a) and Mali (b). Click here for additional data file. Figure S3. Results of disc diffusion assays for testing for resistance to <span class="Chemical">erythromycin and its comparison to resistance to <span class="Chemical">azithromycin in isolates obtained during three annual pre‐and post‐intervention surveys and 1 year after the last post‐intervention survey was done in Burkina Faso. Click here for additional data file. Figure S4. Results of disc diffusion assays for testing for resistance to <span class="Chemical">erythromycin and its comparison to resistance to <span class="Chemical">azithromycin in isolates obtained during three annual pre‐and post‐intervention surveys and 1 year after the last post‐intervention survey was done in Mali. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  20 in total

1.  Revisiting pneumococcal carriage by use of broth enrichment and PCR techniques for enhanced detection of carriage and serotypes.

Authors:  Maria da Gloria Carvalho; Fabiana C Pimenta; Delois Jackson; Alexis Roundtree; Yusra Ahmad; Eugene V Millar; Katherine L O'Brien; Cynthia G Whitney; Adam L Cohen; Bernard W Beall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Impact of community-based mass treatment for trachoma with oral azithromycin on general morbidity in Gambian children.

Authors:  C J Whitty; K W Glasgow; S T Sadiq; D C Mabey; R Bailey
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Association of mass treatment with azithromycin in trachoma-endemic communities with short-term reduced risk of diarrhea in young children.

Authors:  Christian L Coles; Jessica C Seidman; Joshua Levens; Harran Mkocha; Beatriz Munoz; Sheila West
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  A prospective study of the impact of community-based azithromycin treatment of trachoma on carriage and resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  A J Leach; T M Shelby-James; M Mayo; M Gratten; A C Laming; B J Currie; J D Mathews
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Impact of azithromycin administration for trachoma control on the carriage of antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Sarah L Batt; Bambos M Charalambous; Anthony W Solomon; Charles Knirsch; Patrick A Massae; Salesia Safari; Noel E Sam; Dean Everett; David C W Mabey; Stephen H Gillespie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Mass distribution of azithromycin for trachoma control is associated with increased risk of azithromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage in young children 6 months after treatment.

Authors:  Christian L Coles; Kasubi Mabula; Jessica C Seidman; Joshua Levens; Harran Mkocha; Beatriz Munoz; Sayoki G Mfinanga; Sheila West
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  The Effect of Antibiotic Selection Pressure on the Nasopharyngeal Macrolide Resistome: A Cluster-randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jeremy D Keenan; Stephanie A Chin; Abdou Amza; Boubacar Kadri; Baido Nassirou; Vicky Cevallos; Sun Y Cotter; Zhaoxia Zhou; Sheila K West; Robin L Bailey; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Impact of single dose azithromycin on group A streptococci in the upper respiratory tract and skin of Aboriginal children.

Authors:  Tania M Shelby-James; Amanda J Leach; Jonathan R Carapetis; Bart J Currie; John D Mathews
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Short-term increase in prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus following mass drug administration with azithromycin for trachoma control.

Authors:  Ebrima Bojang; James Jafali; Vincent Perreten; John Hart; Emma M Harding-Esch; Ansumana Sillah; David C W Mabey; Martin J Holland; Robin L Bailey; Anna Roca; Sarah E Burr
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Azithromycin to Reduce Childhood Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Jeremy D Keenan; Robin L Bailey; Sheila K West; Ahmed M Arzika; John Hart; Jerusha Weaver; Khumbo Kalua; Zakayo Mrango; Kathryn J Ray; Catherine Cook; Elodie Lebas; Kieran S O'Brien; Paul M Emerson; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pneumococcal Carriage and Antibiotic Resistance in Children Younger than 5 Years in Nouna District, Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Boubacar Coulibaly; Ali Sié; Dramane Kiemde; Nestor Dembélé; Adama Compaore; Ousmane Dabo; Clarisse Dah; Lucienne Ouermi; Vicky Cevallos; Elodie Lebas; Jessica M Brogdon; Jeremy D Keenan; Catherine E Oldenburg
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Post-Vaccination Streptococcus pneumoniae Carriage and Virulence Gene Distribution among Children Less Than Five Years of Age, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Authors:  Richael O Mills; Mohammed R Abdullah; Samuel A Akwetey; Dorcas C Sappor; Isaac Cole; Michael Baffuor-Asare; Johan A Bolivar; Gustavo Gámez; Mark P G van der Linden; Sven Hammerschmidt
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-12-13

3.  Molecular Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Pneumococci among Ghanaian Children under Five Years Post PCV13 Using MLST.

Authors:  Richael O Mills; Mohammed R Abdullah; Samuel A Akwetey; Dorcas C Sappor; Gustavo Gámez; Sven Hammerschmidt
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-02-19

4.  Serotype Profile of Nasopharyngeal Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae Obtained from Children in Burkina Faso before and after Mass Administration of Azithromycin.

Authors:  Soumeya Hema-Ouangraoua; Issaka Zongo; Nongodo Firmin Kabore; Nikiema Frédéric; Rakiswende Serge Yerbanga; Halidou Tinto; Yves Daniel Compaore; Irene Kuepfer; Daniel Chandramohan; Brian Greenwood; Jean Bosco Ouedraogo
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.345

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.