Literature DB >> 31654558

Comparison of residual shunt rate and complications across 6 different closure devices for patent foramen ovale.

Rubine Gevorgyan Fleming1, Preetham Kumar1, Brian West1, Nabil Noureddin2, Joshua Rusheen3, Jamil Aboulhosn1, Jonathan M Tobis1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare residual shunt rate and complications associated with six different devices used for PFO closure.
BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous PFO closure is an effective treatment for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke. The rate of residual shunt is one metric by which the technical success of PFO closure can be measured.
METHODS: Patients who underwent PFO closure at a single center between February 2001 and July 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Right-to-left shunt at baseline and during follow-up was assessed using transcranial Doppler (TCD) or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Periprocedural and device-related complications, including atrial fibrillation, were also assessed.
RESULTS: Of 467 PFO closures performed during this period, 320 patients received quantitative assessment of right-to-left shunting both before and after percutaneous closure. The highest effective closure was achieved with the Cardioform device (100%, n = 104), followed by the Amplatzer Cribriform (93%, n = 14), Helex (90%, n = 137), Amplatzer ASO (88%, n = 17), CardioSEAL (86%, n = 14), and Amplatzer PFO (85%, n = 33) devices. The most common significant adverse event was atrial fibrillation, which was more common with the Cardioform device (13%) than the Helex (4%) or the Amplatzer PFO (4%) devices.
CONCLUSIONS: The Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder provides more robust closure of a PFO when compared to other devices but its effectiveness is offset by the higher prevalence of transient atrial fibrillation.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PFO closure device; complications; patent foramen ovale; patent foramen ovale closure; residual shunt rate

Year:  2019        PMID: 31654558     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Device closure for patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke: which patients should get it?

Authors:  Iris Parrini; Enrico Cecchi; Davide Forno; Alexander R Lyon; Riccardo Asteggiano
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 1.803

2.  Recurrent vertebrobasilar strokes and transient-ischemic attacks with challenging workup: Case report.

Authors:  Sibylle Wilfling; Mustafa Kilic; Blagovesta Tsoneva; Martin Freyer; David Olmes; Christina Wendl; Ralf A Linker; Felix Schlachetzki
Journal:  Brain Circ       Date:  2022-03-21

3.  Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Roel J R Snijder; Laura E Renes; Martin J Swaans; Maarten Jan Suttorp; Jurrien M Ten Berg; Martijn C Post
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.