Literature DB >> 31654476

In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of calcium-phosphate scaffolds three-dimensional printed by stereolithography for bone regeneration.

Laurent Le Guéhennec1,2, Dorien Van Hede3, Erwan Plougonven4, Grégory Nolens5, Bruno Verlée6, Marie-Claire De Pauw2, France Lambert3.   

Abstract

Stereolithography (SLA) is an interesting manufacturing technology to overcome limitations of commercially available particulated biomaterials dedicated to intra-oral bone regeneration applications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility and osteoinductive properties of two calcium-phosphate (CaP)-based scaffolds manufactured by SLA three-dimensional (3D) printing. Pellets and macro-porous scaffolds were manufactured in pure hydroxyapatite (HA) and in biphasic CaP (HA:60-TCP:40). Physico-chemical characterization was performed using micro X-ray fluorescence, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), optical interferometry, and microtomography (μCT) analyses. Osteoblast-like MG-63 cells were used to evaluate the biocompatibility of the pellets in vitro with MTS assay and the cell morphology and growth characterized by SEM and DAPI-actin staining showed similar early behavior. For in vivo biocompatibility, newly formed bone and biodegradability of the experimental scaffolds were evaluated in a subperiosteal cranial rat model using μCT and descriptive histology. The histological analysis has not indicated evidences of inflammation but highlighted close contacts between newly formed bone and the experimental biomaterials revealing an excellent scaffold osseointegration. This study emphasizes the relevance of SLA 3D printing of CaP-based biomaterials for intra-oral bone regeneration even if manufacturing accuracy has to be improved and further experiments using biomimetic scaffolds should be conducted.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone regeneration; bone scaffold; histology; microtomography; stereolithography

Year:  2019        PMID: 31654476     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  5 in total

Review 1.  Multi-Dimensional Printing for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Moyuan Qu; Canran Wang; Xingwu Zhou; Alberto Libanori; Xing Jiang; Weizhe Xu; Songsong Zhu; Qianming Chen; Wujin Sun; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 2.  Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Marjan Bahraminasab
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Additive-Free Gelatine-Based Devices for Chondral Tissue Regeneration: Shaping Process Comparison among Mould Casting and Three-Dimensional Printing.

Authors:  Margherita Montanari; Alex Sangiorgi; Elisabetta Campodoni; Giada Bassi; Davide Gardini; Monica Montesi; Silvia Panseri; Alessandra Sanson; Anna Tampieri; Monica Sandri
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 4.  Conventional and Recent Trends of Scaffolds Fabrication: A Superior Mode for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Islam M Adel; Mohamed F ElMeligy; Nermeen A Elkasabgy
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.321

5.  A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane.

Authors:  Eric Lutsch; Andreas Struber; Georg Auer; Thomas Fessmann; Günter Lepperdinger
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.523

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.