| Literature DB >> 31654324 |
D A J P van de Sande1, P C Barneveld2, J Hoogsteen3, P A Doevendans4,5,6, H M C Kemps3.
Abstract
AIMS: In asymptomatic athletes, abnormal exercise test (ET) results have a poor positive predictive value. It is unknown whether abnormal ET results in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) are related to coronary microvascular dysfunction. It is also unknown whether they should be considered false-positive ET results or a consequence of physiological adaptation to sport. In our study, we evaluated whether athletes with abnormal ET results and documented myocardial ischaemia in the absence of obstructive CAD have an attenuated microvascular function and whether coronary microvascular dysfunction is related to endothelial dysfunction. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Athletes; Coronary flow reserve; Coronary microvascular function; Exercise testing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31654324 PMCID: PMC6890891 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-019-01336-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neth Heart J ISSN: 1568-5888 Impact factor: 2.380
Comparison of the matched characteristics between athletes with concordant abnormal ET and MPS results and the matched individuals with low-to-intermediate risk of CAD
| Athletes ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years ± SD | 53.3 ± 11.3 | 52.7 ± 11.9 |
| Gender, M (%) | 9 (100) | 9 (100) |
| ESC SCORE RISK, mean (%) | 2.6 ± 1.9 | 2.4 ± 2.2 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/l ± SD | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.6 |
| Systolic, mean ± SD | 131.4 ± 19.6 | 123.4 ± 8.7 |
| Diastolic, mean ± SD | 66.8 ± 7.0 | 73.9 ± 11.0 |
| Systolic, mean ± SD | 195.6 ± 21.9 | |
| Diastolic, mean ± SD | 77.8 ± 9.4 | |
| Rate-pressure product | 9551.3 ± 1738.6 | 8723.6 ± 1457.5 |
| Training hours/week | 8 ± 2.7 | n.a. |
| HS/HD, | 8 (88.9) | n.a. |
| LS/HD, | 1 (11.1) | n.a. |
| Sinus rhythm, | 9 (100) | 9 (100) |
| LVH | 6 (66.7) | 2 (22.2) |
| icRBBB | 2 (22.2) | 4 (44.4) |
| TWI | 1 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) |
| LVEDD, mean ± SD (mm) | 48.7 ± 4.1 | n.a. |
| IVSd, mean ± SD (mm) | 9.8 ± 1.8 | n.a. |
| PWTd, mean ± SD (mm) | 9.4 ± 0.8 | n.a. |
| LV mass, mean ± SD (g) | 164.4 ± 29.1 | n.a. |
| LV mass index, mean ± SD (g.m-2) | 80.6 ± 14.7 | n.a. |
| MPS ischaemic defects, mean ± SD | 2.4 ± 0.7 | n.a. |
| Anterior | 4 (44.4) | n.a. |
| Anteroseptal | 1 (11.1) | n.a. |
| Inferolateral | 1 (11.1) | n.a. |
| Lateral | 2 (22.2) | n.a. |
| Basal lateral | 1 (11.1) | n.a. |
| n.a. | ||
| Matched | 4 (45) | |
| Mismatched | 2 (22) | |
| No ischaemic defect | 3 (33) | |
| CAG, normal | 8 (88.9) | n.a. |
| CCTA, normal | 1 (11.1) | n.a. |
ET exercise test, MPS myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, CAD coronary artery disease, SD standard deviation, ESC European Society of Cardiology, HS high-static, HD high-dynamic, LS low-static, LVH left ventricular hypertrophy, icRBBB incomplete right bundle branch block, TWI T-wave inversion, LVEDD left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, IVSd interventricular septal wall thickness at diastole, PWTd posterior wall thickness at diastole, LV left ventricular, MPS myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, CCTA computed tomography coronary angiography, CAG coronary angiography, n.a. not applicable
Comparison of the 82Rb-PET imaging and CCTA results between athletes with concordant abnormal ET and MPS results and the matched individuals with low-to-intermediate risk of CAD
| Athletes ( | Control ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.052 |
| RCx | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.143 |
| RCA | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.104 |
| Global | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.068 |
| Corrected global flow | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.218 |
| LAD | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 0.349 |
| RCx | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 0.262 |
| RCA | 3.1 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 0.741 |
| Global | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 0.841 |
| LAD | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 0.080 |
| RCx | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 0.003 |
| RCA | 3.4 ± 0.8 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 0.004 |
| Global | 3.3 ± 0.8 | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 0.014 |
| Corrected CFR | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 0.045 |
| CACS | 61.1 ± 157.5 | 33.3 ± 50.0 | 0.621 |
| No epicardial CAD, | 9 (100) | 9 (100) | 1.000 |
PET positron emission tomography, ET exercise test, MP myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, CAD coronary artery disease, LAD left anterior descending artery, RCX circumflex artery, RCA right coronary artery, CFR coronary flow reserve, CACS coronary artery calcium score, CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography
Comparison of the laboratory results between athletes with concordant abnormal ET and MPS results and the matched individuals with low-to-intermediate risk of CAD
| Athletes ( | Controls ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRP (mg/l ± SD) | 0.9 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 0.624 |
| Leukocyte count (x10^9/l ± SD) | 5.5 ± 1.3 | 7 ± 0.7 | 0.013 |
| Creatinine clearance (ml/min/1.7 ± SD) | 57.1 ± 4.9 | >60 ± 0.0 | 0.116 |
| Glucose (mmol/l ± SD) | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 0.859 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l ± SD) | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 0.962 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/l ± SD) | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 1.4 | 0.103 |
| HDL (mmol/l ± SD) | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 0.423 |
| Chol/HDL ratio | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 3.7 ± 1.3 | 0.383 |
| LDL (mmol/l ± SD) | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 0.192 |
| ET‑1 (pg/ml ± SD) | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.012 |
ET exercise test, MPS myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, CAD coronary artery disease, SD standard deviation, CRP C-reactive protein, HDL high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, ET‑1 endothelin‑1