Troels Dreier Christensen1, Anna Sofie Kappel Buhl2,3, Ib Jarle Christensen4, Ida Kappel Buhl3,5, Eva Balslev4, Ann S Knoop6, Hella Danø7, Vesna Glavicic8, Adam Luczak9, Sven Tyge Langkjer10, Søren Linnet11, Erik Hugger Jakobsen12, Jurij Bogovic13, Bent Ejlertsen6,14, Annie Rasmussen3, Anker Hansen3, Steen Knudsen3, Peter Buhl Jensen3, Dorte Nielsen2. 1. Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark. troels.dreier.christensen.01@regionh.dk. 2. Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark. 3. Oncology Venture, Hoersholm, Denmark. 4. Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark. 5. Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6. Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Department of Oncology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hilleroed, Denmark. 8. Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark. 9. Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 10. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 11. Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark. 12. Department of Oncology, Vejle Sygehus, Vejle, Denmark. 13. Department of Oncology, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Soenderborg, Denmark. 14. The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, DBCG Secretariat, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fulvestrant is a selective oestrogen receptor (ER) degrader used as monotherapy and combination therapy for ER positive HER2 negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) in postmenopausal women. The drug response predictor (DRP), is a mathematical algorithm based on the expression of multiple genes in the tumour. The fulvestrant DRP algorithm has previously shown effect in BC. In this study, we investigated the DRP's potential in predicting fulvestrant benefit. METHOD: Among 695 patients with ABC prospectively included in a Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) cohort we retrospectively included 226 patients who received fulvestrant as monotherapy. The DRP result was based on mRNA extracted from tumour biopsies and analysed using Affymetrix array. Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: For patients who received fulvestrant in line one to four and were previously unexposed to adjuvant endocrine therapy, we identified a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 (90% confidence interval (90% CI) upper limit of 1.08, one sided p = 0.066) for a predicted positive vs negative outcome. A weaker association was seen when including patients exposed to adjuvant endocrine treatment or received fulvestrant in fifth or later lines. Exploratory analyses showed that the DRP was efficient when using recent biopsies for DRP estimate and among recently treated patients. CONCLUSION: The DRP showed a potential in predicting fulvestrant treatment but was not significant in the overall analysis. Use of older biopsies, long-term endocrine treatment and multiple therapies between biopsy used for analysis and fulvestrant treatment, probably affect the predictive accuracy.
BACKGROUND:Fulvestrant is a selective oestrogen receptor (ER) degrader used as monotherapy and combination therapy for ER positive HER2 negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) in postmenopausal women. The drug response predictor (DRP), is a mathematical algorithm based on the expression of multiple genes in the tumour. The fulvestrant DRP algorithm has previously shown effect in BC. In this study, we investigated the DRP's potential in predicting fulvestrant benefit. METHOD: Among 695 patients with ABC prospectively included in a Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) cohort we retrospectively included 226 patients who received fulvestrant as monotherapy. The DRP result was based on mRNA extracted from tumour biopsies and analysed using Affymetrix array. Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: For patients who received fulvestrant in line one to four and were previously unexposed to adjuvant endocrine therapy, we identified a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 (90% confidence interval (90% CI) upper limit of 1.08, one sided p = 0.066) for a predicted positive vs negative outcome. A weaker association was seen when including patients exposed to adjuvant endocrine treatment or received fulvestrant in fifth or later lines. Exploratory analyses showed that the DRP was efficient when using recent biopsies for DRP estimate and among recently treated patients. CONCLUSION: The DRP showed a potential in predicting fulvestrant treatment but was not significant in the overall analysis. Use of older biopsies, long-term endocrine treatment and multiple therapies between biopsy used for analysis and fulvestrant treatment, probably affect the predictive accuracy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Advanced breast cancer; Biomarker; Fulvestrant; Messenger RNA