Literature DB >> 31654147

Ventilator-associated pneumonia diagnosis: a prioritization exercise based on multi-criteria decision analysis.

João Ferreira-Coimbra1, Carmen Ardanuy2, Emili Diaz3, Marc Leone4, Gennaro De Pascale5,6, Pedro Póvoa7,8,9, Cristina Prat-Aymerich10, Ricardo Serrano-Garcia11,12, Jordi Solé-Violan13,14, Rafael Zaragoza15, Jordi Rello16.   

Abstract

The aim was to provide global experts ranking on priorities in diagnostic tools for VAP in clinical practice. A multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was performed to identify diagnosis tools for VAP diagnosis. Priority factors were identified after literature review. An international, multidisciplinary expert panel reviewed variables and ranked diagnostic tools. Experts from ten European hospitals participated. Regarding bedside clinical practices, seven required chest X-ray use in all patients, whereas six reported the use of blood cultures and endotracheal aspirate in all patients. Invasive techniques were routinely performed in seven sites. CRP, PCT, and Gram stains were performed in all patients by 5, 2, and 8, respectively. Impact on patient outcomes, safety, and impact on the decision to start antibiotic therapy were ranked as the top three relevant concerns (7.7/10, 7/10, and 6.9/10, respectively). Chest X-ray was ranked as the most important imaging technique to diagnose VAP (score 251.7). Apart from blood cultures, endotracheal aspirate culture was identified as the main collection method for the microbiological testing (scores of 274.8 and 246.8, respectively). Mini-BAL was the preferred invasive technique with a score of 208. Top three biomarkers were CRP (score 184.3), PCT (181.3), and WBC (166.4). Gram stain (192.5) was prioritized among laboratory diagnostic techniques. Using MCDA, it is recommended to perform a combination of diagnostic techniques including images (chest X-ray), culture of clinical specimens (blood cultures and endotracheal aspirate), and biomarkers (CRP or PCT) for VAP diagnosis at the bedside. Gram stain was ranked as the preferred laboratory technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Diagnosis; Imaging; MCDA; Microbiology diagnosis; Multicriteria decision analysis; VAP; Ventilator-associated pneumonia

Year:  2019        PMID: 31654147     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03720-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  21 in total

1.  The value of routine microbial investigation in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  J Rello; M Gallego; D Mariscal; R Soñora; J Valles
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Application of BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification panel for rapid identification of the causative agents of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  M R Pulido; P Moreno-Martínez; V González-Galán; F Fernández Cuenca; Á Pascual; J Garnacho-Montero; M Antonelli; G Dimopoulos; J A Lepe; M J McConnell; J M Cisneros
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Complications of mechanical ventilation--the CDC's new surveillance paradigm.

Authors:  Michael Klompas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database.

Authors:  Jordi Rello; Daniel A Ollendorf; Gerry Oster; Montserrat Vera-Llonch; Lisa Bellm; Rebecca Redman; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  G U Meduri
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 6.  Biomarkers for ventilator-associated pneumonia: review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Palazzo; Terri Simpson; Lynn Schnapp
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Spectrum of practice in the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation in European intensive care units.

Authors:  Despoina Koulenti; Thiago Lisboa; Christian Brun-Buisson; Wolfgang Krueger; Antonio Macor; Jordi Sole-Violan; Emili Diaz; Arzu Topeli; Jan DeWaele; Antonio Carneiro; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Apostolos Armaganidis; Jordi Rello
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Evaluation of clinical judgment in the identification and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients.

Authors:  J Y Fagon; J Chastre; A J Hance; Y Domart; J L Trouillet; C Gibert
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Lung ultrasound: a promising tool to monitor ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Guyi Wang; Xiaoying Ji; Yongshan Xu; Xudong Xiang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  ECDC definitions and methods for the surveillance of healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units.

Authors:  Diamantis Plachouras; Alain Lepape; Carl Suetens
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quality of evidence supporting Surviving Sepsis Campaign Recommendations.

Authors:  Jordi Rello; Sofia Tejada; Elena Xu; Candela Solé-Lleonart; Laura Campogiani; Despoina Koulenti; João Ferreira-Coimbra; Jeff Lipman
Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Era of Multidrug-Resistance: Updates in Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Elena Xu; David Pérez-Torres; Paraskevi C Fragkou; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Despoina Koulenti
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-03-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.