Literature DB >> 31653413

What Can We Learn About Drug Safety and Other Effects in the Era of Electronic Health Records and Big Data That We Would Not Be Able to Learn From Classic Epidemiology?

Ali Zarrinpar1, Ting-Yuan David Cheng2, Zhiguang Huo3.   

Abstract

As more and more health systems have converted to the use of electronic health records, the amount of searchable and analyzable data is exploding. This includes not just provider or laboratory created data but also data collected by instruments, personal devices, and patients themselves, among others. This has led to more attention being paid to the analysis of these data to answer previously unaddressed questions. This is especially important given the number of therapies previously found to be beneficial in clinical trials that are currently being re-scrutinized. Because there are orders of magnitude more information contained in these data sets, a fundamentally different approach needs to be taken to their processing and analysis and the generation of knowledge. Health care and medicine are drivers of this phenomenon and will ultimately be the main beneficiaries. Concurrently, many different types of questions can now be asked using these data sets. Research groups have become increasingly active in mining large data sets, including nationwide health care databases, to learn about associations of medication use and various unrelated diseases such as cancer. Given the recent increase in research activity in this area, its promise to radically change clinical research, and the relative lack of widespread knowledge about its potential and advances, we surveyed the available literature to understand the strengths and limitations of these new tools. We also outline new databases and techniques that are available to researchers worldwide, with special focus on work pertaining to the broad and rapid monitoring of drug safety and secondary effects.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Big data; Cancer risk; Drug safety; Electronic health record; Health care database

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31653413      PMCID: PMC6917880          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  49 in total

1.  Commentary: Epidemiology in the era of big data.

Authors:  Stephen J Mooney; Daniel J Westreich; Abdulrahman M El-Sayed
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Challenges and Opportunities for Using Big Health Care Data to Advance Medical Science and Public Health.

Authors:  Susan M Shortreed; Andrea J Cook; R Yates Coley; Jennifer F Bobb; Jennifer C Nelson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  The usefulness of listening social media for pharmacovigilance purposes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Irma Convertino; Sara Ferraro; Corrado Blandizzi; Marco Tuccori
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.250

4.  What's so different about big data?. A primer for clinicians trained to think epidemiologically.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Vincent Liu
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2014-09

5.  Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Julian P T Higgins; Jonathan A C Sterne; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 6.  Exploring association between statin use and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Md Mohaimenul Islam; Hsuan-Chia Yang; Phung-Anh Nguyen; Tahmina Nasrin Poly; Chih-Wei Huang; Shwetambara Kekade; Abdulwahed Mohammed Khalfan; Tonmoy Debnath; Yu-Chuan Jack Li; Shabbir Syed Abdul
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Using EHRs to integrate research with patient care: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Chunhua Weng; Paul Appelbaum; George Hripcsak; Ian Kronish; Linda Busacca; Karina W Davidson; J Thomas Bigger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Levothyroxine use and the risk of breast cancer: a nation-wide population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Chieh-Chen Wu; Ya-Yu Yu; Hsuan-Chia Yang; Phung Anh Nguyen; Tahmina Nasrin Poly; Md Mohaimenul Islam; Usman Iqbal; Hafash Arshed Ali Khan; Yao-Chin Wang; Yung-Tzu Cheng; Yu-Chuan Li; Wen-Shan Jian
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine in early pregnancy and risk of birth defects: population based cohort study and sibling design.

Authors:  Kari Furu; Helle Kieler; Bengt Haglund; Anders Engeland; Randi Selmer; Olof Stephansson; Unnur Anna Valdimarsdottir; Helga Zoega; Miia Artama; Mika Gissler; Heli Malm; Mette Nørgaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-04-17

10.  No association between low-dose aspirin use and breast cancer outcomes overall: a Swedish population-based study.

Authors:  Gabriella Frisk; Sara Ekberg; Elisabet Lidbrink; Sandra Eloranta; Malin Sund; Irma Fredriksson; Mats Lambe; Karin E Smedby
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.