Min-Sang Cha1, Yoon-Hyuk Huh2, Lee-Ra Cho3, Chan-Jin Park4. 1. Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea. 3. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea. 4. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: doctorcj@gwnu.ac.kr.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Materials used for dental restorations should cause wear similar to that of natural teeth. Studies on the wear of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the wear of Co-Cr, gold, and Ni-Cr alloys against monolithic zirconia of different surface roughness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cylindrical monolithic zirconia specimens were prepared by a sintering process. Sintered zirconia was then polished to prepare 30 zirconia substrate specimens with a smooth surface (Ra<0.1 μm) and 30 with a rough surface (3.5 μm<Ra<4.5 μm). As antagonist specimens, 3 types of metal alloys (Co-Cr, gold, and Ni-Cr alloys) were used. Twenty cast crowns were prepared from each metal alloy in the shape of a maxillary premolar. For each alloy, 10 cast crowns were randomly selected to oppose the smooth-surface zirconia specimens and 10 to oppose the rough-surface zirconia specimens. A total of 6 wear test groups were formed. Wear tests were performed by using a mastication simulator at 240 000 mastication cycles. Wear on the antagonist specimens was measured by using a laser 3D scanner. After wear testing, antagonist and substrate specimens were inspected by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For statistical analysis of the data, the 2-way ANOVA and the Scheffé multiple comparison tests were used (α=.05). RESULTS: Of the 6 test groups, the gold alloy specimens opposed to rough-surface zirconia exhibited the most wear, while the Co-Cr alloy specimens opposed to smooth-surface zirconia exhibited the least wear (P<.05). Rough-surface monolithic zirconia caused significantly more wear of the metal alloy specimens than did smooth-surface monolithic zirconia (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased surface roughness of monolithic zirconia was associated with increased wear of the opposing dental alloy. When monolithic zirconia surface roughness was increased, wear of dental alloys increased most for gold alloys, followed by Ni-Cr, and then Co-Cr alloys.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Materials used for dental restorations should cause wear similar to that of natural teeth. Studies on the wear of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the wear of Co-Cr, gold, and Ni-Cr alloys against monolithic zirconia of different surface roughness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cylindrical monolithic zirconia specimens were prepared by a sintering process. Sintered zirconia was then polished to prepare 30 zirconia substrate specimens with a smooth surface (Ra<0.1 μm) and 30 with a rough surface (3.5 μm<Ra<4.5 μm). As antagonist specimens, 3 types of metal alloys (Co-Cr, gold, and Ni-Cr alloys) were used. Twenty cast crowns were prepared from each metal alloy in the shape of a maxillary premolar. For each alloy, 10 cast crowns were randomly selected to oppose the smooth-surface zirconia specimens and 10 to oppose the rough-surface zirconia specimens. A total of 6 wear test groups were formed. Wear tests were performed by using a mastication simulator at 240 000 mastication cycles. Wear on the antagonist specimens was measured by using a laser 3D scanner. After wear testing, antagonist and substrate specimens were inspected by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For statistical analysis of the data, the 2-way ANOVA and the Scheffé multiple comparison tests were used (α=.05). RESULTS: Of the 6 test groups, the gold alloy specimens opposed to rough-surface zirconia exhibited the most wear, while the Co-Cr alloy specimens opposed to smooth-surface zirconia exhibited the least wear (P<.05). Rough-surface monolithic zirconia caused significantly more wear of the metal alloy specimens than did smooth-surface monolithic zirconia (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased surface roughness of monolithic zirconia was associated with increased wear of the opposing dental alloy. When monolithic zirconia surface roughness was increased, wear of dental alloys increased most for gold alloys, followed by Ni-Cr, and then Co-Cr alloys.