| Literature DB >> 31653118 |
Rogie Royce Carandang1,2, Akira Shibanuma3, Junko Kiriya4, Karen Rose Vardeleon5, Maria Aileen Marges6, Edward Asis7, Hiroshi Murayama8, Masamine Jimba9.
Abstract
Senior volunteers represented a significant, mostly untapped lay resource of informal social care. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the training program on improving senior volunteers' competency toward peer counseling, and explored its impact on their well-being after three months of the program implementation. We conducted a pre- and post-intervention analysis among 60 senior volunteers aged 60-82 years. They participated in 40 h of training and performed weekly peer counseling home visits for three months. We evaluated the program using survey questionnaires, trainer observation and debriefing, and focus group discussions. After the training, peer counselors showed a significant improvement (p < 0.001) in knowledge (17.1 versus 22.3) and skills (17.0 versus 17.9). All of them met the minimum required passing level of 70% for the knowledge test, and their overall performance was satisfactory as rated by two independent trainers. After three months, peer counselors showed a significant improvement (p < 0.001) in their subjective well-being (d = 0.69) and depressive symptoms (d = -0.67). Filipino senior volunteers could be trained to serve as peer counselors in their communities. This program improved their competency and well-being. Future research is warranted to determine whether the provision of counseling by them will affect the health outcomes of the target population.Entities:
Keywords: Philippines; aging; leadership; mental health; senior peer counseling
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31653118 PMCID: PMC6861991 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16214108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Overview of training for leadership and peer counseling provided to peer counselors.
| Training Settings | Total Hours | Topics Covered |
|---|---|---|
| Three-day intensive workshop | 24 |
Course overview and introduction to the training Roles and responsibilities of senior peer counselors Aging and mental health Leadership skills Building strong relationships Ability to take action toward healthy aging Communication and counseling skills Psychosocial support Positive living Record keeping and reporting Making of a community-based project |
| Two-day practical training in the community | 16 | Supervised practicum (fieldwork) focusing on the following skills: Greetings and introduction Using helpful nonverbal communication Asking open-ended questions Listening actively and showing interest in the client Reflecting what the client is saying Showing empathy, not sympathy Avoiding judging words Helping the client set goals and summarizing each counseling session |
Socio-demographic characteristics of peer counselors.
| Characteristics | Total (n = 60) | |
|---|---|---|
| n | % | |
| Age, mean (SD) | 67.3 (5.5) | |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 3 | 5.0 |
| Female | 57 | 95.0 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 26 | 43.3 |
| Never married | 3 | 5.0 |
| Separated | 1 | 1.7 |
| Widowed | 30 | 50.0 |
| Education | ||
| Secondary/Tertiary | 60 | 100.0 |
| Monthly income | ||
| No income | 33 | 55.0 |
| Poor income | 16 | 26.7 |
| Average/Good income | 11 | 18.3 |
| Pension | ||
| Have | 32 | 53.3 |
| Do not have | 28 | 46.7 |
| Self-rated health | ||
| Good/Very good | 18 | 30.0 |
| Fair | 31 | 51.7 |
| Bad/Very bad | 11 | 18.3 |
| Chronic diseases | ||
| Have | 52 | 86.7 |
| Do not have | 8 | 13.3 |
| Living arrangement | ||
| Alone | 6 | 10.0 |
| Living with others | 54 | 90.0 |
| Smoking | ||
| Never smoker | 49 | 81.7 |
| Ex-/Current smoker | 11 | 18.3 |
| Drinking alcohol | ||
| Non-drinker | 52 | 86.7 |
| Occasional/ Daily drinker | 8 | 13.3 |
Note: SD—Standard deviation.
Comparison of peer counselors’ pre- and post-intervention competency scores.
| Measures | Pre-Intervention | Post-Intervention | Effect Size a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer counselor competency | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||
| Leadership and counseling knowledge | 17.1 (2.5) | 22.3 (2.4) | 12.89 | <0.001 | 1.66 |
| Observational ratings (skills) | 17.0 (3.0) | 17.9 (2.8) | 6.96 | <0.001 | 0.90 |
Note: SD—Standard deviation; a This effect size (Cohen’s d) is a standardized measure of the difference between after and before the intervention in standard-deviation units.
Training evaluation of peer counselors.
| Measure | Range (Possible Range) | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer counselor satisfaction | |||
| Topics chosen | 3–5 (1–5) | 4.4 | 0.8 |
| Time allocation | 3–5 (1–5) | 4.3 | 0.8 |
| Training materials | 3–5 (1–5) | 4.4 | 0.8 |
| Trainer quality | 3–5 (1–5) | 4.2 | 0.9 |
| Training facility | 3–5 (1–5) | 4.5 | 0.7 |
| Clarity and understandability | 6–10 (0–10) | 9.4 | 1.1 |
| Amount of new knowledge gained | 7–10 (0–10) | 9.6 | 0.9 |
| Relevance and usefulness | 7–10 (0–10) | 9.5 | 0.9 |
| Amount of attitude change | 7–10 (0–10) | 9.6 | 0.9 |
| Overall satisfaction | 7–10 (0–10) | 9.7 | 0.7 |
Note: SD—Standard deviation.
Comparison of peer counselors’ pre- and post-intervention mental health status.
| Measures | Pre-Intervention | Post-Intervention | Effect Size a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer counselor mental health | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||
| Depressive symptoms (GDS-15) | 4.4 (2.4) | 2.9 (2.2) | −5.21 | <0.001 | −0.67 |
| Subjective well-being (WHO-5) | 15.3 (4.2) | 19.1 (4.2) | 5.32 | <0.001 | 0.69 |
Note: SD—Standard deviation; a This effect size (Cohen’s d) is a standardized measure of the difference between after and before the intervention in standard deviation units.
Impact of leadership and peer counseling program on peer counselors’ well-being.
| Key Themes | Sub-Themes | Example Quotes |
|---|---|---|
| Personal growth | Improved knowledge |
|
| Improved interpersonal skills Improved social relations |
| |
| Opportunities as a peer counselor | Advising |
|
| Companionship |
| |
| Active lifestyle |
| |
| Challenges as a peer counselor | Difficult clients |
|
| Indigent clients |
| |
| Finding balance |
|
Note: OSCA—Office for the Senior Citizens Affairs.