Michał Mazurek1, Jonathan L Halperin2, Menno V Huisman3, Hans-Christoph Diener4, Sergio J Dubner5, Chang Sheng Ma6, Kenneth J Rothman7, Jeff S Healey8, Christine Teutsch9, Miney Paquette10, Lionel Riou França11, Shihai Lu12, Dorothee B Bartels11,13, Gregory Y H Lip14. 1. Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland. 2. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany. 5. Clínica y Maternidad Suizo Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6. Department of Cardiology, Atrial Fibrillation Center, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 7. RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 8. Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 9. Department of Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH und Co KG, Ingelheim, Germany. 10. Department of Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Burlington, Canada. 11. Global Epidemiology, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. 12. Department of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA. 13. Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 14. Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess antithrombotic therapy choices in relation to patient age in a large, global registry on atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) is an international programme involving patients with newly diagnosed AF and ≥1 risk factors for stroke. We used Phase II data (from November 2011 through December 2014), which commenced immediately following first non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) approval in participating countries. Of 15 092 patients (mean age 70.5 ± 11.0 years), enrolled at 982 centres, 26.9% were aged <65 years, 33.9% 65-74, 30.5% 75-84, and 8.6% ≥85 years old. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) use was 73.5%, 81.4%, 83.3%, and 82.3% (overall NOACs use was 44.4%, 49.7%, 48.7%, and 45.6%) for those aged <65, 65-74, 75-84 and ≥85 years, respectively. Corresponding proportions for antiplatelet monotherapy and no treatment were: 16.2% and 10.2%; 11.2% and 7.3%; 10.0% and 6.5%; 10.5% and 7.0%, respectively. Of those aged 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years, respectively, 83.7, 86.8 and 85.4% received OAC unless bleeding risk was high (HAS-BLED ≥3), whereby 64.1%, 63.5%, and 64.5% were anticoagulated, and 31.1%, 30.3%, and 31.3% received antiplatelets only. Of patients ≥85 years, OAC use was 88.1% in Europe (NOAC 45.1%), 79.5% in North America (NOAC 44.8%), and 54.1% in Asia (NOAC 40.2%). CONCLUSION: Despite geographic differences in OAC use, neither OAC nor NOAC uptake was lower for patients ≥85 years old compared with younger patients. Although the majority of patients was prescribed OAC at all ages, nearly one-third received antiplatelet monotherapy when bleeding risk was increased. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01468701.
AIMS: To assess antithrombotic therapy choices in relation to patient age in a large, global registry on atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) is an international programme involving patients with newly diagnosed AF and ≥1 risk factors for stroke. We used Phase II data (from November 2011 through December 2014), which commenced immediately following first non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) approval in participating countries. Of 15 092 patients (mean age 70.5 ± 11.0 years), enrolled at 982 centres, 26.9% were aged <65 years, 33.9% 65-74, 30.5% 75-84, and 8.6% ≥85 years old. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) use was 73.5%, 81.4%, 83.3%, and 82.3% (overall NOACs use was 44.4%, 49.7%, 48.7%, and 45.6%) for those aged <65, 65-74, 75-84 and ≥85 years, respectively. Corresponding proportions for antiplatelet monotherapy and no treatment were: 16.2% and 10.2%; 11.2% and 7.3%; 10.0% and 6.5%; 10.5% and 7.0%, respectively. Of those aged 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years, respectively, 83.7, 86.8 and 85.4% received OAC unless bleeding risk was high (HAS-BLED ≥3), whereby 64.1%, 63.5%, and 64.5% were anticoagulated, and 31.1%, 30.3%, and 31.3% received antiplatelets only. Of patients ≥85 years, OAC use was 88.1% in Europe (NOAC 45.1%), 79.5% in North America (NOAC 44.8%), and 54.1% in Asia (NOAC 40.2%). CONCLUSION: Despite geographic differences in OAC use, neither OAC nor NOAC uptake was lower for patients ≥85 years old compared with younger patients. Although the majority of patients was prescribed OAC at all ages, nearly one-third received antiplatelet monotherapy when bleeding risk was increased. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01468701.
Authors: Agnieszka Kotalczyk; Michał Mazurek; Zbigniew Kalarus; Tatjana S Potpara; Gregory Y H Lip Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Farhad Pazan; Ronan Collins; Victor M Gil; Olivier Hanon; Roland Hardt; Martin Hoffmeister; Pedro Monteiro; Terence J Quinn; Dieter Ropers; Giuseppe Sergi; Freek W A Verheugt; Martin Wehling Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 3.923