Fuad Jafarov1, Eda Kaya2, Alev Bakir3, Fatih Eren4,2, Yusuf Yilmaz4,3. 1. Department of Internal Medicine. 2. Department of Medical Biology. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine. 4. Institute of Gastroenterology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical guidelines recommend the use of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score and fibrosis-4 score for estimating the advanced liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. However, these scores are used confidently in eliminating advanced fibrosis, rather than detecting it. Therefore, paired combination with liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography is recommended. In this study, we aimed to validate this combined algorithm in our study population. METHODS: A total of 139 consecutive biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients were enrolled in the study. We calculated the noninvasive scores and performed liver stiffness measurement examination for each patient. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff of liver stiffness measurement for advanced fibrosis was 11.0 kPa (area under curve: 0.856) with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 78%. Using the fibrosis-4 score (< 1.45 for low risk of advanced fibrosis and > 3.25 for high risk of advanced fibrosis) in combination with the liver stiffness measurement cutoffs revealed the best diagnostic performance (< 8.8 kPa for low risk of advanced fibrosis and > 10.9 kPa for high risk of advanced fibrosis). This paired combination had the positive predictive value of 0.735 at a sensitivity of 89% and the negative predictive value of 0.932 at a specificity of 82%. CONCLUSION: A paired combination of the fibrosis-4 score and liver stiffness measurement (< 8.8 kPa for exclusion of advanced fibrosis and > 10.9 kPa for inclusion of advanced fibrosis) is able to diagnose the patients with advanced fibrosis with the highest diagnostic accuracy.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical guidelines recommend the use of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseasefibrosis score and fibrosis-4 score for estimating the advanced liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. However, these scores are used confidently in eliminating advanced fibrosis, rather than detecting it. Therefore, paired combination with liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography is recommended. In this study, we aimed to validate this combined algorithm in our study population. METHODS: A total of 139 consecutive biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver diseasepatients were enrolled in the study. We calculated the noninvasive scores and performed liver stiffness measurement examination for each patient. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff of liver stiffness measurement for advanced fibrosis was 11.0 kPa (area under curve: 0.856) with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 78%. Using the fibrosis-4 score (< 1.45 for low risk of advanced fibrosis and > 3.25 for high risk of advanced fibrosis) in combination with the liver stiffness measurement cutoffs revealed the best diagnostic performance (< 8.8 kPa for low risk of advanced fibrosis and > 10.9 kPa for high risk of advanced fibrosis). This paired combination had the positive predictive value of 0.735 at a sensitivity of 89% and the negative predictive value of 0.932 at a specificity of 82%. CONCLUSION: A paired combination of the fibrosis-4 score and liver stiffness measurement (< 8.8 kPa for exclusion of advanced fibrosis and > 10.9 kPa for inclusion of advanced fibrosis) is able to diagnose the patients with advanced fibrosis with the highest diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Mohammed Eslam; Shiv K Sarin; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Jian-Gao Fan; Takumi Kawaguchi; Sang Hoon Ahn; Ming-Hua Zheng; Gamal Shiha; Yusuf Yilmaz; Rino Gani; Shahinul Alam; Yock Young Dan; Jia-Horng Kao; Saeed Hamid; Ian Homer Cua; Wah-Kheong Chan; Diana Payawal; Soek-Siam Tan; Tawesak Tanwandee; Leon A Adams; Manoj Kumar; Masao Omata; Jacob George Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 6.047
Authors: Yusuf Yilmaz; Nimet Yilmaz; Fehmi Ates; Fatih Karakaya; Hale Gokcan; Eda Kaya; Gupse Adali; Aysun Caliskan Kartal; Ilker Sen; Emel Ahishali; Seren Ozenirler; Mehmet Koruk; Ahmet Uygun; Ramazan Idilman Journal: Hepatol Forum Date: 2021-05-21