Literature DB >> 31651392

How Moral Case Deliberation Supports Good Clinical Decision Making.

Giulia Inguaggiato, Suzanne Metselaar1, Bert Molewijk2, Guy Widdershoven3.   

Abstract

In clinical decision making, facts are presented and discussed, preferably in the context of both evidence-based medicine and patients' values. Because clinicians' values also have a role in determining the best courses of action, we argue that reflecting on both patients' and professionals' values fosters good clinical decision making, particularly in situations of moral uncertainty. Moral case deliberation, a form of clinical ethics support, can help elucidate stakeholders' values and how they influence interpretation of facts. This article demonstrates how this approach can help clarify values and contribute to good clinical decision making through a case example.
© 2019 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31651392     DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMA J Ethics


  2 in total

1.  Physician decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Yajing Zhong; Alice Cavolo; Veerle Labarque; Chris Gastmans
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.113

2.  Moral Dilemmas in Contact-Based Care: The Relevance of Moral Case Deliberation for Forensic Psychiatry.

Authors:  Sylvia Gerritsen; Guy A M Widdershoven; Bernard J Bossenbroek; Yolande Voskes
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.