Literature DB >> 31651391

What Clinical Ethics Can Learn From Decision Science.

Michele C Gornick1, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher2.   

Abstract

Many components of decision science are relevant to clinical ethics practice. Decision science encourages thoughtful definition of options, clarification of information needs, and acknowledgement of the heterogeneity of people's experiences and underlying values. Attention to decision-making processes reminds participants in consultations that how decisions are made and how information is provided can change a choice. Decision science also helps reveal affective forecasting errors (errors in predictions about how one will feel in a future situation) that happen when people consider possible future health states and suggests strategies for correcting these and other kinds of biases. Implementation of decision science innovations is not always feasible or appropriate in ethics consultations, but their uses increase the likelihood that an ethics consultation process will generate choices congruent with patients' and families' values.
© 2019 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31651391     DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMA J Ethics


  2 in total

Review 1.  Digital Technologies and Data Science as Health Enablers: An Outline of Appealing Promises and Compelling Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenges.

Authors:  João V Cordeiro
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-08

Review 2.  Stakeholder bias in best practice advisories: an ethical perspective.

Authors:  Aaron Baird; Bryan Kibbe; Jason Lesandrini
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-06-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.