Literature DB >> 31651078

Automatic three-dimensional analysis of bone volume and quality change after maxillary sinus augmentation.

Jin-Ju Kwon1, JaeJoon Hwang2, Yong-Deok Kim1, Sang-Hun Shin1, Bong-Hae Cho2, Jae-Yeol Lee1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Maxillary sinus augmentation is a widely used surgical procedure to increase the bone volume before implant placement. In order to predict the stability of the implant, analysis of the change in bone volume and quality after a sinus graft procedure is necessary. The purpose of this study was to analyze the change in volume and quality of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Maxillary sinus lift procedures using bovine bone materials (Bio-Oss, Geistrich, Swiss) without immediate implantation were performed at the Pusan National University Dental Hospital in 22 patients, from 2014 to 2017. CBCT images were captured before surgery (T1), a day after surgery (T2), and after 4 to 7 months at follow-up (T3). The T2 and T3 images were registered to the T1 image using histogram matching and intensity-based registration. A total of 30 sinuses were analyzed three-dimensionally (3-D), using self-made software MATLAB 2018a (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts). The volume and structural indices of the bone graft material were measured and analyzed.
RESULTS: The average volume of graft material showed a decrease, while the average gray value showed an increase during the follow-up period, but these changes were not statistically significant. The structural indices of the graft material after histogram matching showed a significant difference in homogeneity, connectivity, thickness, and roughness at the postoperative follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The volume and gray value showed no statistically significant changes after the maxillary sinus lift procedures. The results of this study show that structural analysis using histogram matching can be used as a promising tool to analyze the quality of graft materials.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31651078     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  5 in total

1.  Is jaw fractal dimension a reliable biomarker for osteoporosis screening? A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Authors:  Davi de Sá Cavalcante; Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva; Francisco Samuel Rodrigues Carvalho; Ana Rosa Pinto Quidute; Lúcio Mitsuo Kurita; Adília Mirela Pereira Lima Cid; Thyciana Rodrigues Ribeiro; Marcela Lima Gurgel; Bianca Moreira Kurita; Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Comparison of the performances of low-crystalline carbonate apatite and Bio-Oss in sinus augmentation using three-dimensional image analysis.

Authors:  Koudai Nagata; Kei Fuchigami; Ryoji Kitami; Yurie Okuhama; Kana Wakamori; Hirokazu Sumitomo; Hyunjin Kim; Manabu Okubo; Hiromasa Kawana
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 3.  Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Daniel Deluiz; Julie Vitenson; Niels Henrik Bruun; Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long-term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series.

Authors:  Balazs Feher; Florian Frommlet; Christian Ulm; Reinhard Gruber; Ulrike Kuchler
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  The Relation between Morphology of Maxillary Sinus after Augmentation in Three Classification Methods and Residual Bone Height: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Zhi Wang; Qi Jia; Heng Bo Jiang; Jianmin Han; Lidong Zou; Guangliang Niu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.149

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.