Literature DB >> 31650327

Bone and soft tissue infections in patients with diabetic foot.

Antonio Leone1,2, Carla Vitiello3, Consolato Gullì3, Anna K Sikora4, Silvia Macagnino3, Cesare Colosimo5,3.   

Abstract

Bone and soft tissue infection involving the foot is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and represents a major public health and socioeconomic burden to National Health Services worldwide. Research in the past decade has improved diagnosis and treatment of these frequent and potentially devastating complications of diabetic foot which often remain difficult to be diagnosed and treated despite the availability of various clinical, serological, and imaging modalities. Furthermore, neuropathic osteoarthropathy can share many clinical and imaging features of osteomyelitis, and infection is often superimposed in patients with neuropathic disease. Thus, distinguishing between the two abnormalities is further complicated. Although the reference standard for diagnosis remains microbiologic analysis of bone specimens, in most clinical practice, soft tissue and bone infection involving the diabetic foot is diagnosed solely on the basis of a combination of clinical evaluation, serum inflammatory markers, and imaging modalities. Correlation between imaging findings and clinical features is very important as well as a common knowledge base for treatment team members rather than a compartmentalized view. Thus, the primary purpose of this review article was to provide radiologist and clinician with important clinical knowledge and relevant radiological semiotics, respectively, in order to facilitate a prompt diagnosis and personalised treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Diabetic foot; MR imaging; Osteomyelitis; Personalised medicine; Soft tissue infection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31650327     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01096-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  49 in total

1.  Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lipsky; Anthony R Berendt; H Gunner Deery; John M Embil; Warren S Joseph; Adolf W Karchmer; Jack L LeFrock; Daniel P Lew; Jon T Mader; Carl Norden; James S Tan
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Conservative management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Authors:  S Acharya; M Soliman; A Egun; S M Rajbhandari
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Can sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT replace WBC imaging in the diabetic foot?

Authors:  Demetrio Familiari; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Valeria Vitale; Daniela Prosperi; Oreste Bagni; Andrea Lenza; Marco Cavallini; Francesco Scopinaro; Alberto Signore
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  The diabetic foot. Soft tissue and bone infection.

Authors:  B A Lipsky; R E Pecoraro; L J Wheat
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.982

5.  Validating the probe-to-bone test and other tests for diagnosing chronic osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

Authors:  Rosario Morales Lozano; Maria L González Fernández; David Martinez Hernández; Juan V Beneit Montesinos; Sagrario Guisado Jiménez; Maximo A Gonzalez Jurado
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Unsuspected osteomyelitis is frequent in persistent diabetic foot ulcer and better diagnosed by MRI than by 18F-FDG PET or 99mTc-MOAB.

Authors:  B Schwegler; K D M Stumpe; D Weishaupt; K Strobel; G A Spinas; G K von Schulthess; J Hodler; T Böni; M Y Donath
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.

Authors:  M L Grayson; G W Gibbons; K Balogh; E Levin; A W Karchmer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination and imaging tests for osteomyelitis underlying diabetic foot ulcers: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie T Dinh; Cybele L Abad; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Unsuspected osteomyelitis in diabetic foot ulcers. Diagnosis and monitoring by leukocyte scanning with indium in 111 oxyquinoline.

Authors:  L G Newman; J Waller; C J Palestro; M Schwartz; M J Klein; G Hermann; E Harrington; M Harrington; S H Roman; A Stagnaro-Green
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria on suspected osteomyelitis in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mark E Schweitzer; Richard H Daffner; Barbara N Weissman; D Lee Bennett; Judy S Blebea; Jon A Jacobson; William B Morrison; Charles S Resnik; Catherine C Roberts; David A Rubin; Leanne L Seeger; Mihra Taljanovic; James N Wise; William K Payne
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Role of Serial Radiographs in Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Bone Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Nicola Carlo Bianco; Giulia D'Ambra; Salvatore Lucchesi; Elisa La Rosa; Amato Infante; Daniele Perla; Consolato Gullì
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.122

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal infections.

Authors:  Jennifer S Weaver; Imran M Omar; Winnie A Mar; Andrea S Klauser; Blair A Winegar; Gary W Mlady; Wendy E McCurdy; Mihra S Taljanovic
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2022-03-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.