| Literature DB >> 31649838 |
Farid A Badria1, Saleh Atef2, Abdullah Mohammed Al-Majid2, M Ali2, Yaseen A M M Elshaier3, Hazem A Ghabbour4, Mohammad Shahidul Islam2, Assem Barakat2,5.
Abstract
The Michael addition reaction of barbituric acid with chalcones incorporating the indole scaffold was achieved by using a highly efficient bimetallic Iron-palladium catalyst in the presence of acetylacetone (acac). This catalytic approach produced the desired products in a simple operation and low catalyst loading with acceptable yield of the new hybrids. All tested compounds were subjected for biological activity on α-glucosidase and α-amylase. The results revealed that all synthesized compounds exhibited very good activity against both enzymes when compared to positive control (acarbose). Moreover, compound 5o showed the best activity whereas its IC50 (μM) are 13.02+0.01 and 21.71+0.82 for α-glucosidase and α-amylase respectively. Both compounds 5o and 5l exhibited high similarity in binding mode and pose with amylase protein (4UAC). The obtained data may be used for developing potential hypoglycemic agents. ©2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.Entities:
Keywords: Lewis acid; Michael addition; barbituric acid; bimetallic catalysis; docking studies; indoles; α-amylase; α-glucosidase
Year: 2019 PMID: 31649838 PMCID: PMC6804419 DOI: 10.1002/open.201900240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Figure 1Previous and current study.
Scheme 1Synthesis of the chalcones 3a–q.
Model example for investigation of the reaction parameters.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Solvent | Metal Salts | Ligands | Ligand : Metal mol % | Yield |
| 1. | Toluene | Cu(OTf)2 | L1 | 10 : 11 mol% | No rxn[b] |
| 2. | Toluene | Zn(OTf)2 | L1 | 10 : 11 mol% | No rxn |
| 3. | Toluene/THF | Zn(OTf)2 | L1 | 10 : 11 mol% | No rxn |
| 4. | THF | Zn(OTf)2 | L1 | 10 : 11 mol% | No rxn |
| 5. | ACN | Zn(OTf)2 | L1 | 10 : 11 mol% | No rxn |
| 6. | MeOH | FeCl3/PdCl2 | L1 | 10 : 10 mol% | No rxn |
| 7. | MeOH[a] | FeCl3/PdCl2 | L2 | 10 : 10 mol% | 55 % |
[a] The reaction carried out at 60 °C. [b] No rxn: No reaction.
Substrate scope of desired compounds 5a–q.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Chlacones | Ar | R | Products | [%] Yield |
| 1. |
| Ph | Me |
|
|
| 2. |
| 4‐MePh | Et |
|
|
| 3. |
| 4‐ClPh | Et |
|
|
| 4. |
| 2,4‐Cl2Ph | Et |
|
|
| 5. |
| 4‐OMePh | Et |
|
|
| 6. |
| 4‐BrPh | Et |
|
|
| 7. |
| 4‐FPh | Et |
|
|
| 8. |
| 3‐FPh | Et |
|
|
| 9. |
| 3‐MePh | Et |
|
|
| 10. |
| 3‐BrPh | Et |
|
|
| 11. |
| 4‐CF3Ph | Et |
|
|
| 12. |
| Thiophinyl | Et |
|
|
| 13. |
| Furanyl | Et |
|
|
| 14. |
| 3,4,5‐OMe3Ph | Et |
|
|
| 15. |
| 2‐Napthyl | Et |
|
|
| 16. |
| 2,4,6‐Me3Ph | Et |
|
|
| 17. |
| 4‐NO2Ph | Et |
|
|
Figure 2ORTEP diagram of the titled compounds 5g. Displacement ellipsoids are plotted at the 40 % probability level for non‐H atoms.
Experimental details of 5g.
| Crystal data | |
|---|---|
| Chemical formula | C25H24FN3O4 |
|
| 449.47 |
| Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, |
| Temperature (K) | 293 |
|
| 12.128 (5), 28.221 (12), 8.718 (3) |
| β (°) | 129.532 (9) |
|
| 2301.4 (16) |
|
| 4 |
| Radiation type | Mo |
| μ (mm−1) | 0.09 |
| Crystal size (mm) | 0.33×0.20×0.09 |
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) of 5g.
| O9−C15 | 1.374 (16) | N1−C18 | 1.488 (10) |
| O1−C9 | 1.230 (10) | N2−C21 | 1.369 (12) |
| O2−C21 | 1.216 (9) | N2−C22 | 1.384 (11) |
| O3−C22 | 1.231 (11) | N2−C24 | 1.477 (14) |
| O4−C23 | 1.208 (9) | N3−C22 | 1.353 (11) |
| N1−C1 | 1.386 (11) | N3−C23 | 1.372 (11) |
| N1−C8 | 1.355 (10) | N3−C25 | 1.479 (10) |
| C1−N1−C8 | 108.3 (6) | O1−C9−C10 | 120.6 (7) |
| C1−N1−C18 | 126.0 (7) | O9−C15−C14 | 116.6 (10) |
| C8−N1−C18 | 125.7 (7) | O9−C15−C16 | 120.0 (13) |
| C21−N2−C22 | 123.7 (7) | N1−C18−C19 | 115.2 (9) |
| C21−N2−C24 | 119.2 (7) | O2−C21−N2 | 119.9 (7) |
| C22−N2−C24 | 117.0 (8) | O2−C21−C20 | 121.6 (8) |
| C22−N3−C23 | 124.4 (6) | N2−C21−C20 | 118.5 (7) |
| C22−N3−C25 | 117.5 (7) | O3−C22−N2 | 120.2 (9) |
| C23−N3−C25 | 118.1 (6) | O3−C22−N3 | 121.1 (8) |
| N1−C1−C2 | 129.6 (7) | N2−C22−N3 | 118.7 (8) |
| N1−C1−C6 | 107.6 (7) | O4−C23−N3 | 120.1 (7) |
| N1−C8−C7 | 110.8 (7) | O4−C23−C20 | 121.5 (8) |
| O1−C9−C7 | 121.3 (8) | N3−C23−C20 | 118.4 (7) |
Figure 3Molecular packing of titled compounds 5g viewed hydrogen bonds which are drawn as dashed lines along b axis.
Hydrogen‐bond geometry (Å, °) of 5g.
|
|
| H⋅⋅⋅ |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C10−H10B⋅⋅⋅O2 | 0.9700 | 2.3200 | 2.975 (12) | 124.00 |
| C14−H14A⋅⋅⋅O9i | 0.9300 | 2.3400 | 3.170 (13) | 148.00 |
| C18−H18A⋅⋅⋅O4ii | 0.9700 | 2.4500 | 3.364 (14) | 156.00 |
| C25−H25B⋅⋅⋅O3iii | 0.9600 | 2.5400 | 3.388 (15) | 148.00 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1, z+1/2; (ii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x, −y+1, z−1/2.
Results of the α‐glucosidase and α‐Amylase inhibitory activity of the synthesized compounds 5a–q.
| # | Compounds | α‐Glucosidase | α‐Amylase |
|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 ( | |||
| 1 |
| 65.14±0.17 | 93.25±0.10 |
| 2 |
| 53.15±0.12 | 80.17±0.05 |
| 3 |
| 49.75±0.01 | 71.24±0.20 |
| 4 |
| 58.21±0.09 | 96.42±0.22 |
| 5 |
| 61.42±0.78 | 88.45±0.32 |
| 6 |
| 53.15±0.12 | 78.25±0.10 |
| 7 |
| 69.75±0.01 | 86.42±0.22 |
| 8 |
| 61.10±0.42 | 89.45±0.44 |
| 9 |
| 73.15±0.12 | 95.25±0.10 |
| 10 |
| 77.05±0.04 | 86.42±0.22 |
| 11 |
| 20.49±0.44 | 47.11±0.09 |
| 12 |
| 22.28±0.48 | 35.42±0.60 |
| 13 |
| 64.35±0.08 | 82.15±0.50 |
| 14 |
| 53.15±0.12 | 93.25±0.10 |
| 15 |
| 13.02±0.01 | 21.71±0.82 |
| 16 |
| 31.12±0.11 | 63.00±0.61 |
| STD |
| 2.35±0.13 | 0.75±0.07 |
*α‐Glucosidase and ±‐amylase are expressed with mean±SD of triplicates.
Figure 4Snap shot visualization of 5o docked with ID: 4AUC, showing formation of two HBs interaction as illustrated by Vida
Figure 5Snap shot visualization of compound 5l overlays with 5o and shown same binding mode and pose with receptor.