Literature DB >> 31649042

Clonality, Antigen Recognition, and Suppression of CD8+ T Cells Differentially Affect Prognosis of Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Reno Debets1, John W M Martens1, Dora Hammerl2, Maarten P G Massink3, Marcel Smid1, Carolien H M van Deurzen4, Hanne E J Meijers-Heijboer5, Quinten Waisfisz5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In breast cancer, response rates to immune therapies are generally low and differ significantly across molecular subtypes, urging a better understanding of immunogenicity and immune evasion. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We interrogated large gene-expression data sets including 867 node-negative, treatment-naïve breast cancer patients (microarray data) and 347 breast cancer patients (whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome data) according to parameters of T cells as well as immune microenvironment in relation to patient survival.
RESULTS: We developed a 109-immune gene signature that captures abundance of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and is prognostic in basal-like, her2, and luminal B breast cancer, but not in luminal A or normal-like breast cancer. Basal-like and her2 are characterized by highest CD8 TIL abundance, highest T-cell clonality, highest frequencies of memory T cells, and highest antigenicity, yet only the former shows highest expression level of immune and metabolic checkpoints and highest frequency of myeloid suppressor cells. Also, luminal B shows a high antigenicity and T-cell clonality, yet a low abundance of CD8 TILs. In contrast, luminal A and normal-like both show a low antigenicity, and notably, a low and high abundance of CD8 TILs, respectively, which associates with T-cell influx parameters, such as expression of adhesion molecules.
CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our data argue that not only CD8 T-cell presence itself, but rather T-cell clonality, T-cell subset distribution, coinhibition, and antigen presentation reflect occurrence of a CD8 T-cell response in breast cancer subtypes, which have been aborted by distinct T-cell-suppressive mechanisms, providing a rationale for subtype-specific combination immune therapies. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31649042     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  12 in total

1.  Therapeutic Implications for Intrinsic Phenotype Classification of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ilsa M Coleman; Navonil DeSarkar; Colm Morrissey; Li Xin; Martine P Roudier; Erolcan Sayar; Dapei Li; Eva Corey; Michael C Haffner; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 13.801

2.  A bilateral tumor model identifies transcriptional programs associated with patient response to immune checkpoint blockade.

Authors:  Ivy X Chen; Kathleen Newcomer; Kristen E Pauken; Vikram R Juneja; Kamila Naxerova; Michelle W Wu; Matthias Pinter; Debattama R Sen; Meromit Singer; Arlene H Sharpe; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 is associated with unfavorable prognosis in ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Anna E M Bastiaansen; A Mieke Timmermans; Marcel Smid; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Esther S P Hulsenboom; Wendy J C Prager-van der Smissen; Renée Foekens; Anita M A C Trapman-Jansen; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt; Theo M Luider; John W M Martens; Martijn M vanDuijn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment by genome editing for precision cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ke Liu; Jia-Jia Cui; Yan Zhan; Qian-Ying Ouyang; Qi-Si Lu; Dong-Hua Yang; Xiang-Ping Li; Ji-Ye Yin
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 27.401

5.  V-Domain Ig Suppressor of T Cell Activation (VISTA) Expression Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Pim Mutsaers; Hayri E Balcioglu; Rowan Kuiper; Dora Hammerl; Rebecca Wijers; Mark van Duin; Bronno van der Holt; Annemiek Broijl; Walter Gregory; Sonja Zweegman; Pieter Sonneveld; Reno Debets
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Formosanin C promotes the curative efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in a mouse model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Jing Li; Qianqian Cui; Fuyuan Li; Gaiying Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  TCR Redirected T Cells for Cancer Treatment: Achievements, Hurdles, and Goals.

Authors:  Francesco Manfredi; Beatrice Claudia Cianciotti; Alessia Potenza; Elena Tassi; Maddalena Noviello; Andrea Biondi; Fabio Ciceri; Chiara Bonini; Eliana Ruggiero
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Comparison of tumor microenvironment in primary and paired metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancers: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Annalisa Zeppellini; Stefania Galimberti; Biagio Eugenio Leone; Claudia Pacifico; Francesca Riva; Federica Cicchiello; Serena Capici; Claudia Maggioni; Luca Sala; Marina Elena Cazzaniga
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Elevated expression of FREM1 in breast cancer indicates favorable prognosis and high-level immune infiltration status.

Authors:  Han-Ning Li; Xing-Rui Li; Zheng-Tao Lv; Miao-Miao Cai; Ge Wang; Zhi-Fang Yang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Endogenous and Therapeutic Estrogens: Maestro Conductors of the Microenvironment of ER+ Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Linda A Schuler; Fern E Murdoch
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.