Ryon P Graf1, Melanie Hullings2, Ethan S Barnett2, Emily Carbone2, Ryan Dittamore1, Howard I Scher3. 1. Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: scherh@mskcc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proof of the clinical utility of a biomarker is when its use informs a management decision and improves patient outcomes relative to when it is not used. OBJECTIVE: To model the clinical benefit of the nuclear-localized androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) test for men with progressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) at the second line of therapy or greater to inform the choice of an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) or a taxane. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study population was a cross-sectional cohort of 193 unique patients with progressing mCRPC from whom 255 samples were drawn at the time of the second line or later treatment decision who then received an ARSI or taxane, with up to 3 yr of additional follow-up Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were identified from blood samples and tested for AR-V7. Physicians were blinded to AR-V7 status and the testing laboratory was blinded to outcomes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: We measured physician propensity for choosing an ARSI or taxane based on patient prognosis. We also measured overall survival (OS) adjusted for physician propensity by drug class; OS data were analyzed both without and with knowledge of nuclear-localized AR-V7 status. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Treating physicians had a propensity for choosing a taxane over an ARSI for patients with more advanced disease or who received an ARSI as the immediate prior therapy. After adjusting for physician propensity, discernible OS differences were not observed between taxane- and ARSI-treated patients (median 15.6 vs 14.4 mo; p =0.11). Patients with detectable nuclear-localized AR-V7 in CTCs had superior survival with taxanes over ARSIs (median 9.8 vs 5.7 mo; p = 0.041). AR-V7-negative patients had superior survival on ARSIs over taxanes (p = 0.033) but overlapping curves limit the interpretation. Mutivariable models showed a robust interaction between AR-V7 status and drug, and a lower risk of death on taxanes for AR-V7-positive men. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the nuclear-localized AR-V7 CTC test to inform treatment choice can improve patient outcomes relative to decisions based solely on standard-of-care measures. PATIENT SUMMARY: Men with metastatic prostate cancer who test positive for AR-V7 protein in circulating tumor cells are likely to live longer if taxane chemotherapy is used.
BACKGROUND: Proof of the clinical utility of a biomarker is when its use informs a management decision and improves patient outcomes relative to when it is not used. OBJECTIVE: To model the clinical benefit of the nuclear-localized androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) test for men with progressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) at the second line of therapy or greater to inform the choice of an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) or a taxane. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study population was a cross-sectional cohort of 193 unique patients with progressing mCRPC from whom 255 samples were drawn at the time of the second line or later treatment decision who then received an ARSI or taxane, with up to 3 yr of additional follow-up Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were identified from blood samples and tested for AR-V7. Physicians were blinded to AR-V7 status and the testing laboratory was blinded to outcomes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: We measured physician propensity for choosing an ARSI or taxane based on patient prognosis. We also measured overall survival (OS) adjusted for physician propensity by drug class; OS data were analyzed both without and with knowledge of nuclear-localized AR-V7 status. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Treating physicians had a propensity for choosing a taxane over an ARSI for patients with more advanced disease or who received an ARSI as the immediate prior therapy. After adjusting for physician propensity, discernible OS differences were not observed between taxane- and ARSI-treated patients (median 15.6 vs 14.4 mo; p =0.11). Patients with detectable nuclear-localized AR-V7 in CTCs had superior survival with taxanes over ARSIs (median 9.8 vs 5.7 mo; p = 0.041). AR-V7-negative patients had superior survival on ARSIs over taxanes (p = 0.033) but overlapping curves limit the interpretation. Mutivariable models showed a robust interaction between AR-V7 status and drug, and a lower risk of death on taxanes for AR-V7-positive men. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the nuclear-localized AR-V7 CTC test to inform treatment choice can improve patient outcomes relative to decisions based solely on standard-of-care measures. PATIENT SUMMARY:Men with metastatic prostate cancer who test positive for AR-V7 protein in circulating tumor cells are likely to live longer if taxane chemotherapy is used.
Authors: Johann S de Bono; Simon Chowdhury; Susan Feyerabend; Tony Elliott; Enrique Grande; Amal Melhem-Bertrandt; Benoit Baron; Mohammad Hirmand; Patrick Werbrouck; Karim Fizazi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Charles J Ryan; Matthew R Smith; Karim Fizazi; Fred Saad; Peter F A Mulders; Cora N Sternberg; Kurt Miller; Christopher J Logothetis; Neal D Shore; Eric J Small; Joan Carles; Thomas W Flaig; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Celestia S Higano; Paul de Souza; Johann S de Bono; Thomas W Griffin; Peter De Porre; Margaret K Yu; Youn C Park; Jinhui Li; Thian Kheoh; Vahid Naini; Arturo Molina; Dana E Rathkopf Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: William K Oh; Raymond Miao; Francis Vekeman; Jennifer Sung; Wendy Y Cheng; Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle; Ravinder Dhawan; Mei Sheng Duh Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Andrew J Armstrong; Susan Halabi; Jun Luo; David M Nanus; Paraskevi Giannakakou; Russell Z Szmulewitz; Daniel C Danila; Patrick Healy; Monika Anand; Colin J Rothwell; Julia Rasmussen; Blair Thornburg; William R Berry; Rhonda S Wilder; Changxue Lu; Yan Chen; John L Silberstein; Gabor Kemeny; Giuseppe Galletti; Jason A Somarelli; Santosh Gupta; Simon G Gregory; Howard I Scher; Ryan Dittamore; Scott T Tagawa; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Daniel J George Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Patricia Deverka; Donna A Messner; Robert McCormack; Gary H Lyman; Margaret Piper; Linda Bradley; David Parkinson; David Nelson; Howard L McLeod; Mary Lou Smith; Louis Jacques; Tania Dutta; Sean R Tunis Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Howard I Scher; David Lu; Nicole A Schreiber; Jessica Louw; Ryon P Graf; Hebert A Vargas; Ann Johnson; Adam Jendrisak; Richard Bambury; Daniel Danila; Brigit McLaughlin; Justin Wahl; Stephanie B Greene; Glenn Heller; Dena Marrinucci; Martin Fleisher; Ryan Dittamore Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Richard J Rebello; Christoph Oing; Karen E Knudsen; Stacy Loeb; David C Johnson; Robert E Reiter; Silke Gillessen; Theodorus Van der Kwast; Robert G Bristow Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Heather J Chalfin; Tiziano Pramparo; Amir Mortazavi; Scot A Niglio; Joseph D Schonhoft; Adam Jendrisak; Yen-Lin Chu; Robin Richardson; Rachel Krupa; Amanda K L Anderson; Yipeng Wang; Ryan Dittamore; Sumanta K Pal; Primo N Lara; Mark N Stein; David I Quinn; Seth M Steinberg; Lisa M Cordes; Lisa Ley; Marissa Mallek; Olena Sierra Ortiz; Rene Costello; Jacqueline Cadena; Carlos Diaz; James L Gulley; William L Dahut; Howard Streicher; John J Wright; Jane B Trepel; Donald P Bottaro; Andrea B Apolo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Emma Clark; Miranda Morton; Shriya Sharma; Holly Fisher; Denise Howel; Jenn Walker; Ruth Wood; Helen Hancock; Rebecca Maier; John Marshall; Amit Bahl; Simon Crabb; Suneil Jain; Ian Pedley; Rob Jones; John Staffurth; Rakesh Heer Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Michelle M Kouspou; Jenna E Fong; Nadine Brew; Sarah T F Hsiao; Seanna L Davidson; Peter L Choyke; Tony Crispino; Suneil Jain; Guido W Jenster; Beatrice S Knudsen; Jeremy L Millar; Nicole Mittmann; Charles J Ryan; Bertrand Tombal; Mark Buzza Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 14.432