Claire A Glashan1, Bawer J Tofig2, Qian Tao3, Sira A Blom1, Monique R M Jongbloed4, Jens C Nielsen2, Peter Lukac2, Steen B Kristiansen2, Katja Zeppenfeld5. 1. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 3. Department of Radiology, Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: K.Zeppenfeld@lumc.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the value of combined electrogram (EGM) information provided by simultaneous mapping using micro- and conventional electrodes in the identification of post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia substrate. BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardias after myocardial infarction are related to scars with complex geometry. Scar delineation and ventricular tachycardia substrate identification relies on bipolar voltages (BV) and EGM characteristics. Early reperfusion therapy results in small, nontransmural scars, the details of which may not be delineated using 3.5 mm tip catheters. METHODS: Nine swine with early reperfusion myocardial infarction were mapped using Biosense Webster's QDOT Micro catheter, incorporating 3 microelectrodes at the tip of the standard 3.5 mm electrode. Analysis of EGM during sinus rhythm, right ventricular pacing, and short-coupled right ventricular extrastimuli was performed. The swine were sacrificed and mapping data were projected onto the heart. Transmural biopsies (n = 196) corresponding to mapping points were obtained, allowing a head-to-head comparison of EGM recorded by micro- and conventional electrodes with histology. RESULTS: To identify scar areas using standard electrodes, unique cutoff values of unipolar voltage <5.44 mV, BV <1.27 mV (conventional), and BV <2.84 mV (microelectrode) were identified. Combining the information provided by unipolar voltage and BV mapping, the sensitivity of scar identification was increased to 93%. Micro-EGM were better able to distinguish small near-fields corresponding to a layer of viable subendocardium than conventional EGM were. CONCLUSIONS: The combined information provided by multisize electrode mapping increases the sensitivity with which areas of scar are identified. EGM from microelectrodes, with narrower spacing, allow identification of near-fields arising from thin subendocardial layer and layers activated with short delay obscured in EGM from conventional mapping catheter.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the value of combined electrogram (EGM) information provided by simultaneous mapping using micro- and conventional electrodes in the identification of post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia substrate. BACKGROUND:Ventricular tachycardias after myocardial infarction are related to scars with complex geometry. Scar delineation and ventricular tachycardia substrate identification relies on bipolar voltages (BV) and EGM characteristics. Early reperfusion therapy results in small, nontransmural scars, the details of which may not be delineated using 3.5 mm tip catheters. METHODS: Nine swine with early reperfusion myocardial infarction were mapped using Biosense Webster's QDOT Micro catheter, incorporating 3 microelectrodes at the tip of the standard 3.5 mm electrode. Analysis of EGM during sinus rhythm, right ventricular pacing, and short-coupled right ventricular extrastimuli was performed. The swine were sacrificed and mapping data were projected onto the heart. Transmural biopsies (n = 196) corresponding to mapping points were obtained, allowing a head-to-head comparison of EGM recorded by micro- and conventional electrodes with histology. RESULTS: To identify scar areas using standard electrodes, unique cutoff values of unipolar voltage <5.44 mV, BV <1.27 mV (conventional), and BV <2.84 mV (microelectrode) were identified. Combining the information provided by unipolar voltage and BV mapping, the sensitivity of scar identification was increased to 93%. Micro-EGM were better able to distinguish small near-fields corresponding to a layer of viable subendocardium than conventional EGM were. CONCLUSIONS: The combined information provided by multisize electrode mapping increases the sensitivity with which areas of scar are identified. EGM from microelectrodes, with narrower spacing, allow identification of near-fields arising from thin subendocardial layer and layers activated with short delay obscured in EGM from conventional mapping catheter.
Authors: C Pandozi; Marco Valerio Mariani; C Chimenti; V Maestrini; D Filomena; M Magnocavallo; M Straito; A Piro; M Russo; M Galeazzi; S Ficili; F Colivicchi; P Severino; M Mancone; F Fedele; C Lavalle Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Ruben Schleberger; Jana M Schwarzl; Julia Moser; Moritz Nies; Alexandra Höller; Paula Münkler; Leon Dinshaw; Christiane Jungen; Marc D Lemoine; Philippe Maury; Frederic Sacher; Claire A Martin; Tom Wong; Heidi L Estner; Pierre Jaïs; Stephan Willems; Christian Eickholt; Christian Meyer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Karl Magtibay; Stéphane Massé; Ahmed Niri; Robert D Anderson; Ram B Kumar; D Curtis Deno; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2021-09-04