Literature DB >> 31648729

New antimicrobial susceptibility data from monitoring of Mycoplasma bovis isolated in Europe.

Ulrich Klein1, Anno de Jong2, Myriam Youala3, Farid El Garch4, Clelia Stevenin5, Hilde Moyaert6, Markus Rose7, Salvatore Catania8, Miklós Gyuranecz9, Andrew Pridmore10, Roger D Ayling11.   

Abstract

Mycoplasma bovis is an important respiratory pathogen of cattle across Europe and is included in the MycoPath pan-European antimicrobial susceptibility monitoring programme. M. bovis strains (232) were isolated from cattle, not recently treated with antimicrobials, at diverse geographical locations in France, Great Britain, Hungary, Italy and Spain during 2014 to 2016. Only one isolate per farm and per outbreak was retained. For each isolate, the MICs of ten antimicrobials were determined in a central laboratory using a broth microdilution method with modified Eaton's medium and incubation at 35 °C ± 1 °C for 24 ± 6 h. MIC50/MIC90 (mg/L) values for the 232 strains were: danofloxacin 0.25/1; enrofloxacin 0.5/8; marbofloxacin 1/4; gamithromycin >64/>64; spiramycin 8/16; tilmicosin >64/>64; tulathromycin >64/>64; tylosin 64/>64; florfenicol 4/8; oxytetracycline 8/32. Minor between-country differences in the MIC90 values were observed for the fluoroquinolones, spiramycin and oxytetracycline, whilst the MIC values for the other compounds were similar. Spain and Italy had the higher MIC90 values for the fluoroquinolones. Compared with the 2010-2012 study (156 isolates) results are similar, with an overall MIC50 increase of at most one doubling dilution for enrofloxacin, spiramycin, tylosin, florfenicol and oxytetracycline. In contrast, the MIC90 value for oxytetracycline decreased from >64 to 32 mg/L. Standardized laboratory methods and interpretive criteria for MIC testing of veterinary mycoplasmas are clearly needed; there are currently no clinical breakpoints available to facilitate data interpretation and correlation of MICs with in vivo efficacy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial susceptibility; Cattle; Minimal inhibitory concentrations; Mycoplasma bovis; Surveillance

Year:  2019        PMID: 31648729     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis in Algeria and Characterisation of the Isolated Clones.

Authors:  Yasmine Oucheriah; Nouzha Heleili; Adélie Colin; Catherine Mottet; Florence Tardy; Claire A M Becker
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Genetic Markers for Antimicrobial Resistance in Mycoplasma bovis.

Authors:  Jade Bokma; Nick Vereecke; Hans Nauwynck; Freddy Haesebrouck; Sebastiaan Theuns; Bart Pardon; Filip Boyen
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 3.  Recent Developments in Vaccines for Bovine Mycoplasmoses Caused by Mycoplasma bovis and Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides.

Authors:  Katarzyna Dudek; Ewelina Szacawa; Robin A J Nicholas
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24

4.  High quality genome assemblies of Mycoplasma bovis using a taxon-specific Bonito basecaller for MinION and Flongle long-read nanopore sequencing.

Authors:  Nick Vereecke; Jade Bokma; Freddy Haesebrouck; Hans Nauwynck; Filip Boyen; Bart Pardon; Sebastiaan Theuns
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Importance and Antimicrobial Resistance of Mycoplasma bovis in Clinical Respiratory Disease in Feedlot Calves.

Authors:  Ana García-Galán; Juan Seva; Ángel Gómez-Martín; Joaquín Ortega; Francisco Rodríguez; Ángel García-Muñoz; Christian De la Fe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.