Literature DB >> 31648592

Improvement of the Mouse Grimace Scale set-up for implementing a semi-automated Mouse Grimace Scale scoring (Part 1).

Lisa Ernst1, Marcin Kopaczka2, Mareike Schulz1, Steven R Talbot3, L Zieglowski1, M Meyer1, S Bruch1, Dorit Merhof2, Rene H Tolba1.   

Abstract

The Mouse Grimace Scale (MGS) has been widely used for the noninvasive examination of distress/pain in mice. The aim of this study was to further improve its performance to generate repeatable, faster, blinded and reliable results for developing automated and standardized pictures for MGS scoring and simultaneous evaluation of up to four animals. Videos of seven C57BL/6N mice were generated in an experiment to assess pain and stress induced by repeated intraperitoneal injection of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). MGS scores were taken 1 h before and after the injection. Videotaping was performed for 10 min in special observation boxes. For manual selection, pictures of each mouse were randomly chosen for quality analysis and scored according six quality selection criteria (0 = no, 1 = moderate, 2 = full accordance); the maximum possible score was 12. Overall, 609 pictures from six videos were evaluated for MGS scoring quality; evaluation was performed by using the picture selection tool or by manual scoring. With manual scoring, 288 pictures (48.3% of all randomly generated pictures) were deemed scorable using MGS (mean score = 22.15 ± SD 6.3). To evaluate the algorithm, ratings from different rater groups (beginner, medium-level trained, professional) were compared with the automated image generated. These differences were not significant (p = 0.1091). This study demonstrates an improved set-up and a picture selection tool that can generate repeatable, not-observer biased and standardized pictures for MGS scoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MGS; behaviour; distress; ethics and welfare; pain measurement; severity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31648592     DOI: 10.1177/0023677219881655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  4 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Affective State in Laboratory Rodents to Promote Animal Welfare-What Is the Progress in Applied Refinement Research?

Authors:  Paulin Jirkof; Juliane Rudeck; Lars Lewejohann
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  A model-specific simplification of the Mouse Grimace Scale based on the pain response of intraperitoneal CCl4 injections.

Authors:  André Bleich; René H Tolba; Steven R Talbot; Lisa Ernst; Stefan Bruch; Marcin Kopaczka; Dorit Merhof
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Reliability of the Mouse Grimace Scale in C57BL/6JRj Mice.

Authors:  Katharina Hohlbaum; Giuliano Mario Corte; Melanie Humpenöder; Roswitha Merle; Christa Thöne-Reineke
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Objective Assessment of Acute Pain in Foals Using a Facial Expression-Based Pain Scale.

Authors:  Johannes van Loon; Nicole Verhaar; Els van den Berg; Sarah Ross; Janny de Grauw
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.