| Literature DB >> 31648577 |
Christina Nilsson1, Wolfgang Sperker1, Claudia Schien1, Malin Isaksson1, Bernd G Stegmayr1,2.
Abstract
AIM: When performing acute onset dialysis after insertion of catheters for peritoneal dialysis, pain exists and tunnel infections may develop. This study investigated whether patients benefit from the use of a surgical girdle and specific dressing postoperatively to prevent pain and tunnel infections.Entities:
Keywords: Peritoneal dialysis; insertion technique; leakage; wound healing
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31648577 PMCID: PMC7851719 DOI: 10.1177/0391398819882439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Artif Organs ISSN: 0391-3988 Impact factor: 1.595
Figure 1.(a) Place the girdle behind the back and distend it. The girdle is preferably fixed around the patient when in a supine position. (b) The girdle thereafter is fixed at the front of the patient. (c) The external part of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is allowed to exit the girdle (not to compress it onto the skin). Fixation of the girdle includes the surgical wound as well as the exit site of the dialysis catheter. The girdle is tightened to only give a slight feeling of compression in supine position, to counteract the intra-abdominal pressure from the fluid instilled in the abdomen. If the pressure is high, this might counteract the ultrafiltration pressure achieved by the PD glucose. The aim is that the patients should feel comfortable and not oppressed.
Figure 2.The catheter is fixed in a curved loop under the dressing (see hatched line) to avoid distension at the exit site if the catheter is stretched (direction A). The movements will transform to area B where only a change of the curvature appears while the exit at C is not altered. This location is used throughout the PD period. The exit site is flushed by chlorhexidine containing ethanol (70%) two to three times/week and each time after a shower before a new bandage is placed.
Subjective experience of wearing the girdle is given in percentage of girdle carriers (N = 37).
| Benefit | Percentage | Disadvantage | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 22 | Awkward | 5.5 |
| Feeling of support | 11 | Squeezed | 5.5 |
| Comfortable and relieving | 8 | Uncomfortable | 5.5 |
| Good support | 8 | Unpleasant | 2.7 |
| Keeps the catheter in place | 8 | Compression of belly | 2.7 |
| Feeling of safety | 5 | Cumbersome | 2.7 |
| Pleasant support of abdomen | 5 | Difficult to adapt | 2.7 |
| Allowed more liberty of action | 3 | Difficult to sit | 2.7 |
| Comfortable | 3 | Loss of abdominal tonus | 2.7 |
| Counter pressure | 3 | Nausea feeling | 2.7 |
| Feeling of safety | 3 | Pain, nausea | 2.7 |
| Got more relaxed | 3 | Pressure of abdomen | 2.7 |
| Less pain | 3 | Stiff | 2.7 |
| Feel more secure | 3 | Unwieldy | 2.7 |
| Pleasant | 3 |
Figure 3.Patient experienced postoperative pain graded by visual analogue scale (“no pain” = 0 to “severe pain” = 10, VAS). Scatter plot of data is shown. Wilcoxon non-parametric paired analysis was performed. Median (-), p values, and number of pairs within each day (n) either experienced without the girdle (None) and with the girdle (With).