Literature DB >> 31647528

The Dutch Public Health Foresight Study 2018: an example of a comprehensive foresight exercise.

Marieke Verschuuren1, Henk B M Hilderink1, Robert A A Vonk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of foresight studies is common in some policy fields, but not in public health. Interest in such studies is growing. This paper gives a general overview of the Dutch Public Health Foresight Study (PHFS) 2018, providing insight into what performing a broad scenario exercise in the field of public health entails and its societal impacts.
METHODS: The aim of the PHFS-2018 was: (a) to show how public health and healthcare in the Netherlands will develop over the next 25 years if we pursue our current course and detect 'new' developments; (b) to give options for dealing with the major future societal challenges. Part a was addressed by means of a quantitative business-as-usual scenario exercise complemented with qualitative thematic studies, and part b by elaborating courses of action for three key challenges, based on stakeholder consultation. Typical aspects of the PHFS methods are a multidisciplinary, participatory and conceptual approach and using a broad definition of health.
RESULTS: The PHFS-2018 is the basis for the upcoming National Health Policy Memorandum and the Trend Scenario is the baseline for the National Prevention Agreement. Unexpectedly, the findings about increasing mental pressure in young people received most attention. There still is room for expanding use of the study to its full potential.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term thinking could be stimulated by using back casting techniques and stronger involvement of policy-makers in the elaboration of options for action. Lessons learned from developing intersectoral policy at the local level could be applied at the national level.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31647528     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  3 in total

Review 1.  Foresight in the time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Maria Isabella Gariboldi; Vivian Lin; Jessica Bland; Mallika Auplish; Amy Cawthorne
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2020-12-09

2.  Public and patient involvement in health data governance (DATAGov): protocol of a people-centred, mixed-methods study on data use and sharing for rare diseases care and research.

Authors:  Cláudia de Freitas; Mariana Amorim; Helena Machado; Elisa Leão Teles; Maria João Baptista; Alicia Renedo; Veerle Provoost; Susana Silva
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A Technological Scenario for a Healthier, More Equitable and Sustainable Europe in 2040: Citizen Perceptions and Policy Implications.

Authors:  Arlind Xhelili; Rosa Strube; Francesca Grossi; Iva Zvěřinová; Timothy Taylor; Pablo Martinez-Juarez; Sonia Quiroga; Cristina Suárez; Dragan Gjorgjev
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.