Literature DB >> 31647316

Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Updates on HER2 Assessment in Breast Cancer With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry Results With Focus on Cases With HER2/CEP17 Ratio <2.0 and Average HER2 Copy Number ≥4.0 and <6.0.

Raza S Hoda1, Edi Brogi1, Jin Xu1, Katia Ventura1, Dara S Ross1, Chau Dang1, Mark Robson1, Larry Norton1, Monica Morrow1, Hannah Y Wen1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline in breast cancer was updated in 2018 to address issues on interpretation of uncommon results using dual-probe in situ hybridization according to the 2013 guideline. OBJECTIVE.—: To assess impact of the 2018 guideline on breast cancer with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry results. DESIGN.—: We retrospectively reviewed HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data (HER2/CEP17 ratio and average HER2 copy number per cell) of HER2 immunohistochemistry-equivocal (2+ or 1+ to 2+) breast cancers at our center between January 2014 and May 2018 and compared HER2 FISH results according to 2013 and 2018 guidelines. RESULTS.—: A total of 1666 HER2 FISH results from 1421 patients with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry were reviewed. Based on the 2013 guideline, HER2 FISH results were amplified in 346 cases (20.8%), equivocal in 242 (14.5%), and nonamplified in 1078 (64.7%). Using the 2018 guideline, 258 cases (16%) were reclassified, including 242 previously equivocal test results (15%) and 16 previously positive results (1%) reclassified as negative. The subset of 2013 HER2-equivocal and 2018 HER2-nonamplified cases with HER2/CEP17 ratio lower than 2.0 and average HER2 copy number 4.0 or higher and lower than 6.0 showed higher incidence of micropapillary morphology compared with HER2-amplified cases. Despite most patients in this group not receiving HER2-targeted treatment, 96% had no evidence of disease at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS.—: The 2018 guideline eliminated HER2 FISH-equivocal cases by reclassifying HER2-equivocal cases and cases with nonclassical amplification without HER2 overexpression as HER2 negative. As a consequence, we observed a considerable increase in HER2 FISH-negative cases and a slight decrease in HER2 FISH-positive cases.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31647316     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0307-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  3 in total

1.  Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Min Chong Kim; Su Hwan Kang; Jung Eun Choi; Young Kyung Bae
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

2.  Distinct clinical and somatic mutational features of breast tumors with high-, low-, or non-expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status.

Authors:  Guochun Zhang; Chongyang Ren; Cheukfai Li; Yulei Wang; Bo Chen; Lingzhu Wen; Minghan Jia; Kai Li; Hsiaopei Mok; Li Cao; Xiaoqing Chen; Jiali Lin; Guangnan Wei; Yingzhi Li; Yuchen Zhang; Charles M Balch; Ning Liao
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 11.150

3.  Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.

Authors:  Raza S Hoda; Anita S Bowman; Ahmet Zehir; Pedram Razavi; Edi Brogi; Marc Ladanyi; Maria E Arcila; Hannah Y Wen; Dara S Ross
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.087

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.