OBJECTIVE: Although there are currently several efficacious treatments for depressed and suicidal adolescents, less is known about predictors and moderators of adolescents' treatment response. A growing literature has identified family functioning as a prognostic indicator of adolescents' likelihood of benefiting from treatment. The current study tested both observational and perceived measures of family functioning as indicators of adolescents' response to 2 treatment conditions. METHOD: The sample consisted of 129 depressed and suicidal adolescents (Mage = 14.96, 82.9% female, 56% Black/African American) who were randomized to attachment-based family therapy or family-enhanced nondirective supportive therapy (Diamond et al., 2019). Baseline assessments of family functioning included ratings of parent-adolescent communication coded with the Goal-Corrected Partnership in Adolescence Coding System (Lyons-Ruth, Hennighausen, & Holmes, 2005) and adolescent and parent reports of Family Conflict and Cohesion from the Self-Report of Family Functioning (Bloom, 1985). RESULTS: Adolescents who engaged in more uncooperative communication with their parents during a 10-min conflict discussion showed greater reductions in depressive symptoms in both treatments. Adolescents from traditionally underserved (non-White or lower income) families showed greater reductions in suicidal ideation in both treatments. CONCLUSIONS:Attachment-based family therapy and family-enhanced nondirective supportive therapy were most effective for adolescents from traditionally underserved families and adolescents who engaged in less cooperative communication with their caregivers. Observational ratings of parent-adolescent communication were better prognostic indicators of treatment response than were self-reported indicators of global family functioning. Implications for generalizing these results to other treatments for depressed and suicidal adolescents are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Although there are currently several efficacious treatments for depressed and suicidal adolescents, less is known about predictors and moderators of adolescents' treatment response. A growing literature has identified family functioning as a prognostic indicator of adolescents' likelihood of benefiting from treatment. The current study tested both observational and perceived measures of family functioning as indicators of adolescents' response to 2 treatment conditions. METHOD: The sample consisted of 129 depressed and suicidal adolescents (Mage = 14.96, 82.9% female, 56% Black/African American) who were randomized to attachment-based family therapy or family-enhanced nondirective supportive therapy (Diamond et al., 2019). Baseline assessments of family functioning included ratings of parent-adolescent communication coded with the Goal-Corrected Partnership in Adolescence Coding System (Lyons-Ruth, Hennighausen, & Holmes, 2005) and adolescent and parent reports of Family Conflict and Cohesion from the Self-Report of Family Functioning (Bloom, 1985). RESULTS: Adolescents who engaged in more uncooperative communication with their parents during a 10-min conflict discussion showed greater reductions in depressive symptoms in both treatments. Adolescents from traditionally underserved (non-White or lower income) families showed greater reductions in suicidal ideation in both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Attachment-based family therapy and family-enhanced nondirective supportive therapy were most effective for adolescents from traditionally underserved families and adolescents who engaged in less cooperative communication with their caregivers. Observational ratings of parent-adolescent communication were better prognostic indicators of treatment response than were self-reported indicators of global family functioning. Implications for generalizing these results to other treatments for depressed and suicidal adolescents are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Tara M Chaplin; Rajita Sinha; Jessica A Simmons; Stephen M Healy; Linda C Mayes; Rebecca E Hommer; Michael J Crowley Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: John Curry; Paul Rohde; Anne Simons; Susan Silva; Benedetto Vitiello; Christopher Kratochvil; Mark Reinecke; Norah Feeny; Karen Wells; Sanjeev Pathak; Elizabeth Weller; David Rosenberg; Betsy Kennard; Michele Robins; Golda Ginsburg; John March Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: David A Brent; Graham J Emslie; Greg N Clarke; Joan Asarnow; Anthony Spirito; Louise Ritz; Benedetto Vitiello; Satish Iyengar; Boris Birmaher; Neal D Ryan; Jamie Zelazny; Matthew Onorato; Betsy Kennard; Taryn L Mayes; Lynn L Debar; James T McCracken; Michael Strober; Robert Suddath; Henrietta Leonard; Giovanna Porta; Martin B Keller Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: David J Cottrell; Alexandra Wright-Hughes; Michelle Collinson; Paula Boston; Ivan Eisler; Sarah Fortune; Elizabeth H Graham; Jonathon Green; Allan O House; Michael Kerfoot; David W Owens; Eirini-Christina Saloniki; Mima Simic; Fiona Lambert; Justine Rothwell; Sandy Tubeuf; Amanda J Farrin Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Darren B Courtney; Priya Watson; Karolin R Krause; Benjamin W C Chan; Kathryn Bennett; Meredith Gunlicks-Stoessel; Terri Rodak; Kirsten Neprily; Tabitha Zentner; Peter Szatmari Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-02-01