Literature DB >> 31646451

Prognostic Performance of Preoperative Staging: Assessed by Using Multidetector Computed Tomography-Between the New Clinical Classification and the Pathological Classification in the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Gastric Carcinoma.

Oh Jeong1,2, Mi Ran Jung1,2, Ji Hoon Kang1,2, Seong Yeob Ryu3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification recently introduced the clinical classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer, the new clinical classification has not been extensively validated yet. Therefore, in this study, we compared the prognostic performance of the new clinical classification and the pathologic classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer.
METHODS: We reviewed 3027 patients with gastric cancer who were surgically treated between 2009 and 2013. Patient survival was analyzed according to the preoperative stage by the clinical classification and the pathologic classification in the eighth AJCC classification. The prognostic performance was examined using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) value and Harrell c-index.
RESULTS: Patient survival was significantly different across the different stages when both classifications were used. However, individual pairwise comparisons showed that survival differences between each stage were more distinctive and homogeneous in the pathologic classification. In the multivariate model adjusted for the final pathologic stage, preoperative staging by the pathologic classification was an independent prognostic factor, whereas the clinical classification was not. The pathologic classification showed a lower AIC value compared with the clinical classification (5100.64 vs. 5114.14). The Harrell c-index was higher in the pathologic classification than in the clinical classification (0.741 vs. 0.739).
CONCLUSIONS: The new clinical classification in the eighth AJCC classification discriminates patient survival well. However, it does not appear to have a better prognostic performance compared with the pathologic classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31646451     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07845-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  A novel 8-genome instability-associated lncRNAs signature predicting prognosis and drug sensitivity in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Changhong Yi; Xiulan Zhang; Xia Chen; Birun Huang; Jing Song; Minghui Ma; Xiaolu Yuan; Chaohao Zhang
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.298

2.  Clinical Research of Combined Application of DCEUS and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MSCT in Preoperative cT Staging of Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Junling Wang; Xia Li; Zhijie Zhang; Chao Jing; Jie Li
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 3.  Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications.

Authors:  Geofrey Mahiki Mranda; Ying Xue; Xing-Guo Zhou; Wang Yu; Tian Wei; Zhi-Ping Xiang; Jun-Jian Liu; Yin-Lu Ding
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-25

4.  Survival of 7,311 lung cancer patients by pathological stage and histological classification: a multicenter hospital-based study in China.

Authors:  Siyi He; He Li; Maomao Cao; Dianqin Sun; Fan Yang; Xinxin Yan; Shaoli Zhang; Yutong He; Lingbin Du; Xibin Sun; Ning Wang; Min Zhang; Kuangrong Wei; Lin Lei; Changfa Xia; Ji Peng; Wanqing Chen
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.