Literature DB >> 31646400

Why do Belgian Community Pharmacists Still Treat Electronic Prescriptions as Paper-Based?

Sven Van Laere1, Pieter Cornu2, Evy Dreesen3, Jan Lenie3, Ronald Buyl4.   

Abstract

Belgium is in a transition phase from paper-based prescriptions to electronic prescriptions (ePrescriptions) during which both the paper and electronic format are valid. Since patients still get a paper proof of the ePrescription, sometimes pharmacists use the ePrescription as paper-based prescription. When the government demands a complete dematerialization, i.e. no more paper-based prescriptions, this will no longer be possible. Therefore, we questioned the frequency and reasons for treating an ePrescription as paper-based. The logged interactions in the national database were used to identify possible reasons. The tarification service Koninklijk Limburgs Apothekers Verbond (KLAV) provided prescriptions of June 2018. KLAV supports tarification for community pharmacies all over Belgium, thereby providing a representative sample for the Belgian community pharmacies. A two-stage cluster random sampling technique was applied to retrieve a subset of 10,000 prescriptions. In this subset we identified 4961 ePrescriptions (49.61%) of which 226 (4.56%, in total 2.26%) were treated as paper-based. Reasons observed for this incorrect handling are (1) non-compliance of the community pharmacist; (2) errors in software or handling of the community pharmacist; (3) errors at the prescriber side or patient tries to fraud; (4) incorrectly revoking the ePrescription; and (5) errors in software of prescriber. The main reasons for treating ePrescriptions as paper-based are non-compliance of the community pharmacist (n = 124, 54.87%) by ignoring its digital nature, and errors in software or handling of the community pharmacist (n = 85, 37.61%). Future research is necessary to investigate user opinions and to measure the impact of introducing ePrescribing in the daily routine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belgium; Community pharmacy services; Electronic prescribing; Medical informatics; eHealth

Year:  2019        PMID: 31646400     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1456-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  9 in total

1.  Adoption of and experience with e-prescribing by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Krutika S Jariwala; Erin R Holmes; Benjamin F Banahan; David J McCaffrey
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2012-06-12

Review 2.  A review of the literature and proposed classification on e-prescribing: Functions, assimilation stages, benefits, concerns, and risks.

Authors:  Pouyan Esmaeil Zadeh; Monica Chiarini Tremblay
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2015-03-14

3.  Problem prescriptions in Sweden necessitating contact with the prescriber before dispensing.

Authors:  Anders Ekedahl
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2009-10-30

4.  Medication safety and the usability of electronic prescribing as perceived by physicians-A semistructured interview among primary health care physicians in Finland.

Authors:  Hanna Kauppinen; Riitta Ahonen; Pekka Mäntyselkä; Johanna Timonen
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Use of a national database as a tool to identify primary medication non-adherence: The Estonian ePrescription system.

Authors:  Ott Laius; Heti Pisarev; Daisy Volmer; Sulev Kõks; Aare Märtson; Katre Maasalu
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2017-10-05

6.  The past and current state of the Czech outpatient electronic prescription (eRecept).

Authors:  Jan Bruthans
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Data Resource Profile: The Danish National Prescription Registry.

Authors:  Anton Pottegård; Sigrun Alba Johannesdottir Schmidt; Helle Wallach-Kildemoes; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Jesper Hallas; Morten Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 8.  A Copmarative Review of Electronic Prescription Systems: Lessons Learned from Developed Countries.

Authors:  Mahnaz Samadbeik; Maryam Ahmadi; Farahnaz Sadoughi; Ali Garavand
Journal:  J Res Pharm Pract       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

9.  Patient Perceptions of Electronic Prescriptions in Belgium: An Exploratory Policy Analysis.

Authors:  Laura Suykerbuyk; Marieke Robbrecht; Simon De Belder; Hilde Bastiaens; Wim Martinet; Hans De Loof
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.