Literature DB >> 3164592

Intrusion of posterior teeth with magnets. An experiment in growing baboons.

M G Woods1, R S Nanda.   

Abstract

The dental and skeletal effects of occlusal bite blocks with and without repelling magnets are compared; while depression of buccal teeth did not occur with both types of appliance, some less favorable effects were also noted with the magnets.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3164592     DOI： 10.1043/0003-3219(1988)058<0136:IOPTWM>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN： 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  4 in total

1.  [The effect of static magnetic fields on osteoblast activity: an in-vitro study].

Authors:  M A Papadopulos; I Hörler; H Gerber; B A Rahn; T Rakosi
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-08

2.  [The treatment of open bite using magnets].

Authors:  A Breunig; T Rakosi
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-06

3.  Comparison of two treatment strategies for the early treatment of an anterior skeletal open bite : Posterior bite block-vertical pull chin cup (PBB-VPC) vs. posterior bite block-high pull headgear (PBB-HPH).

Authors:  Hakan Turkkahraman; Ebru Cetin
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Early treatment of anterior open bite: Comparison of the vertical and horizontal morphological changes induced by magnetic bite-blocks and adjusted rapid molar intruders.

Authors:  Mhd Hassan Albogha; Ichiro Takahashi; Mhd Naser Sawan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 1.372
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.