Literature DB >> 31645865

Clinical Feature and Genetics in Rett Syndrome: A Report on Iranian Patients.

Parvaneh Karimzadeh, Majid Kheirollahi, Seyed Massoud Houshmand, Sepideh Dadgar, Omid Aryani, Omid Yaghini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Rett syndrome is characterized by normal development for the first 6-18 months of life followed by the loss of fine and gross motor skills and the ability to engage in social interaction. In most patients, mutations are found in methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene. We investigated the relation between Rett clinical diagnosis and mutations in MECP2. MATERIALS &
METHODS: Children suspected of Rett syndrome were invited to participate in this study. Twenty-three patients from the Mofid Hospital, Tehran, Iran suffered from classic Rett syndrome diagnostic criteria were enrolled in 2012. The severity of symptoms was assessed for all of them. The peripheral blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and the genomic DNA was extracted using standard salting out method. The mutation of MEPC2 gene was studied using DNA sequencing method.
RESULTS: Overall, 11(47.8%) patients had MECP2 gene mutation, while 12 cases (52.2%) had no mutations. Changes in genetics were associated with phenotypical manifestations. The most prevalent mutation was p.v288 mainly associated with partially or uncontrolled seizures.
CONCLUSION: For the first time, we studies the Rett syndrome in terms of clinical manifestations and genetic changes in Iran.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics; Iran; MECP2; Rett Syndrome

Year:  2019        PMID: 31645865      PMCID: PMC6789083     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol        ISSN: 1735-4668


Introduction

Rett syndrome is a X-linked progressive brain developmental disorder and one of the most common causes of mental retardation in females first described in the 1960s by Andreas Rett (1). Girls affected with classic form of Rett syndrome (RTT) seem to have normal development for 6 to 18 months. This course then followed by the loss of acquired fine and gross motor skills and the ability to engage in social interaction. Abnormal stereotypic hand movements may also occur. Rett syndrome primarily affects females and has an incidence of 1:10000 at birth until the age of 12 years (2). Rett syndrome has two main types: classic and atypical. These two types may be characterized by their symptoms or specific gene mutations, and most patients with Rett syndrome have a classic form (3). Mutations in the X-linked gene methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) have been found in the majority of patients. MeCP2 is a protein that is critical for normal brain function. This protein is involved in maintaining synapses between nerve cells (4). The mutations in the gene encoding MECP2 are associated with rare familial cases of RTT as well as in the usual sporadic cases of typical RTT (4). Using modern mutation detection tests, n 70%-80% of patients with typical RTT mutations are found in MECP2 (5). In addition to RTT, mutations in MECP2 have also been identified in cases with no clinical features of RTT. Mutations are in the X-linked gene MECP2, which encodes MeCP2 protein. MeCP2 is a member of family of methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins (MBD), but with their unique differences that help put it apart from the group. More than 600 MECP2 mutations have been identified, including missense, nonsense, frameshift and large deletion mutations that are pathogenic effect (RettBase; http://mecp2.chw.edu.au/). Most of these changes in MECP2 gene cause RTT in heterozygous females, but there is allelic heterogeneity in this disorder and a range of MECP2 mutations associated with variable phenotypic outcomes, including milder forms of learning disability and, rarely, autism, are also known (4, 6). MECP2 has two functional domains, a methyl-cytosine-binding domain (MBD) with composition of 85 amino acids and a transcriptional repression domain (TRD) which has 103 amino acids. The MBD domain binds to the methylation sites of CpG in the DNA strands and then TRD region makes reaction with SIN3A to utilize histone deacetylases (HDAC). There are also two high mobility group protein-like domains. The unusual, repetitive sequences are found at the carboxyl terminus (7, 8). At one end of the spectrum, asymptomatic female carriers are found in familial RTT (11). Skewing of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in these individuals allows them to have a normal presentation. At the other end of spectrum, boys with MECP2 mutations are confronted with severe early postnatal encephalopathy, early death, and absence of the distinctive clinical features of RTT (9). In addition to MECP2 mutations, cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) and Netrin G1, two other genes have recently been known in patients with clinical phenotype of Rett syndrome (10-14). At present, a variety of clinical trials are done in RTT. As suggested in previous comprehensive studies conducted by Rett Search Consortium, clinical trials and other research studies to use a set of guidelines for classifying the disease (15). First, all individuals should be carefully reviewed and categorized clinically based on revised clinical criteria. The clinical diagnosis for all participants should be clearly stated in each publication. Second, comprehensive and complete genetic testing for mutations in MECP2 should be performed for all participants. This would include the sequencing of the coding region (15). We felt that Rett syndrome patients were not well studied in Iran. Therefore, we examined these patients based on the two main principals mentioned above to determine the spectrum of mutation in patients with Rett syndrome.

Materials and Methods

Patients and samples Twenty-three female children suspected of Rett syndrome referred to Neurology Outpatient Clinic, Mofid Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 2012 were invited to take part in this study. Referred individuals should have had a history of a period of relatively normal development after birth, followed by regression of developmental skills including the use of volitional hand, as well as reduced the speed of head circumference growth. The patients were enrolled in this study after observing the diagnostic criteria of classic Rett syndrome. The diagnosis of RTT was based exclusively on a set of clinical criteria derived from expert consensus (Table 1) (15).
Table 1

Rett syndrome diagnostic criteria

RequirementsConsider diagnosis when postnatal deceleration of head growth obseved
Required for typical or classic RTTRequired for atypical or variant RTT
1.A period of regression followed by recovery or stabilization2.All main criteria and all exclusion criteria3.supportive criteria are not required.although often present in typical RTT1.A period of regression followed by recovery or stabilization2.at least 2 of the 4 main criteria3.5out of 11 supportive criteria
Criteria
Main criteria1. Partial or complete loss of aquired purposeful hand skills2. Partial or complete loss of aquired spoken language3. Gait abnormalities:impaired or absence of ability4. Stereotypic hand movements such as hand writing/squeezing, clapping/tapping,mouthing and washing/rubbing automatism
Exclusion criteria for typical RTT1.Brain injury secondary to trauma(peri- or postnataly),neurometabolic disease,or sever infection that causes neurological problems2.Grossly abnormal psychomotor development in first 6 months of life
Supportive criteria for atypical RTT1. Breathing disturbance when awake2. Bruxism when awake3. Impaired sleep pattern4. Abnormal muscle tone5. Peripheral vasomotor distrurbance6. scoliosois/kyphosis7. Growth retardation8. Small cold hands and feet9. Inappropriate laughing/screaming spells10. Diminshed response to pain11. Intense eye communication”eye pointing”
All examinations were performed by an expert pediatric neurologist. If any of them did not cooperate in the ongoing research, they were excluded from the study. For all included patients, severity of symptoms was assessed by a questionnaire. Locomotion, onset of signs and symptoms, seizure, head circumference growth, thrive, hand use, communication abilities, autonomic system disorders, EEG, scoliosis and self-abuse were graded from 0 to 3 to reflect severity of the signs and symptoms (Table 2).
Table 2

Signs and Symptoms severity assessment questionnaire

01 plus2 pluses3 pluses
Signs and Symptoms age of onsetNoAfter 30 months18-30 monthsLess than 18 months
LocomotionWithout helpWith helpWith deviceDisable to walk
SeizureNoUnder controlPartially controlledUncontrolled
Head circumference growthNormalLess than 2SDLess than 3SDLess than 4SD
ThriveNormalMild FTTModerate FTTSever FTT
Hand useProperGraspingMoving towardDisable
Communication abilitiesProper-
Autonomic system disordersNormalCold handsCold hands and feet-
EEGNormalMild abnormalModerate abnormalSevere abnormal
Scoliosis NoMildModerateSevere
Self abuseNoOccasionalUsual-
Informed consent was obtained from all the parents of patients for participation in this study. MEPC2 gene mutation was studied by DNA sequencing method. We collected blood sample from suspected patients referred to genetic laboratory. The genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood in EDTA tubes by standard salting out method. DNA purity was assessed with a spectrophotometer and calculated by ratio of the DNA optical density (OD 260) and protein optical density (OD 280). DNA yield was calculated from DNA optical density (OD 260) for clean DNA samples. To avoid errors derived from Taq PCR polymerase, PCR was performed using PFU DNA polymerase (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). Finally, the reaction products were sequenced and examined by Chromas program. Having gathered patients’ data and molecular results, descriptive correlation between genotype and phenotype was finally investigated.

Results

Of 27 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 23 accepted to participate in the study. The mean age of 23 included patients in study was 5.2 yr with SD: ±2.13. The minimum and maximum age was 2, and 10 yr, respectively. The age of onset for signs and symptoms was ranged mostly less than 18 months (87%) and only 3 of 23 patients (13%) had shown their signs and symptoms in the range of 18-30 months. According to the chart brought in methods section, the severity of signs and symptoms were defined from 0 (less sever) to 3 (most sever) pluses (Table 3).
Table 3

Signs and symptoms for each patient

Patient number Thrive Psychomotor regression Head growth Locomotion communication Autonomic dysfunction Hand use Self abuse seizure EEG Scoliosis Genetic mutation
1++++-+-++--+N*
2-+++++-++-++++-Y**
3+++++++++++--+N
4-+-++-+-++-Y
5+++++++++++++++++-N
6-++-+-++++++-N
7-+++++++-++++-N
8++++++++-+++-Y
9-++++-+-+--N
10-+++++++++-+-N
11-++++++-+----N
12-++++-+----Y
13+++-+++++++++++++++++N
14++++++++++-++++++++++-Y
15-+++++++-++++++N
16-+++++++++-+++---Y
17+++++++-++++++--N
18-++++-+-++++-Y
19-+-+++-++++-N
20-++-+-++++++Y
21++++++-+++++++++Y
22-++++++-+-+++++-Y
23-++++++-+----Y

* N stands for patients without genetic mutation ** Y stands for patients with genetic mutation

In addition, frequencies for each of signs or symptoms were calculated. Of 23 included patients, 3 could walk without help, 12 needed help, 4 needed devices to walk and 4 were disabled. Five patients were affected by uncontrolled Seizure, 4 had partially controlled and 9 had controlled seizure, meanwhile five Rett syndrome patients had not any complaint of seizure. Head circumference, thrive, hand use, communication abilities, autonomic system disorders, EEG, Scoliosis and self-abuse descriptive results are brought in Table 4. Regarding MECP2 gene mutation, 11 patients (47.8% of total included patients) had this mutation meanwhile 12 (52.2%) had no mutation.
Table 4

Frequency of severity of signs and symptoms

DescriptionNumber (percent)DescriptionNumber(percent)DescriptionNumber (percent)DescriptionNumber (percent)
Locomotion (walking)Without help3(13%)With help12(52.2%)With device4(17.4%)Disable to walk4(17.4%)
SeizureNo5(21.7%)Under control9(39.1%)Partially controlled4(17.4%)uncontrolled5(21.7%)
Head circumference growthNormal3(13%)Less than 2SD15(65.2%)Less than 3SD4(17.4%)Less than 4SD1(4.3%)
ThriveNormal15(65.2%)Mild FTT2(8.7%)Moderate FTT6(26.1%)Sever FTT0
Hand useProper0Grasping13(56.5%)Moving toward9(39.1%)Disable1(4.3%)
Communication abilitiesProper016(69.6%)7(30.4%)-0
Autonomic system disordersNormal16(69.6%)Cold hands5(21.7%)Cold hands and feet2(8.7%)-0
EEGNormal8(34.8%)Mild abnormal4(17.4%)Moderate abnormal6(26.1%)Severe abnormal5(21.7%)
Scoliosis No17(73.9%)Mild5(21.7%)Moderate0Severe1(4.3%)
Self abuseNo11(47.8%)Occasional10(43.5%)Usual2(8.7%)-0
Of all 13 patients who showed epilepsy, MECP2 positive patients were more prone to have epilepsy. Eight epileptic patients had MECP2 mutation and the remaining 5 had not any evidence for MECP2 mutation. However, severity of epilepsy (uncontrolled seizures) was not related to MECP2. Similar results were seen in EEG abnormalities. Hand use, psychomotor retardation and communication problems were seen in all patients either in MECP2 positives or negatives. Autonomic dysfunction was seen in 7 patients that only one of them had MECP2 mutation and other 6 ones had no evidence of mutation. MEPC2 gene mutation was studied for each patient too. Ten patients showed evidence of nucleotide changes including missense, nonsense or frameshift. The rest of patients did not show any evidence of changes. The detail of the changes detected for each patient is brought in Table 5 and Figure 1.
Table 5

Gene mutation was studied for each patient

Patient’s numberNucleotide changeAmino acid changeType of seq. changeReferencesFigure
18c.750_750delCinsTCAGGAAGCTTp.P251fsFrame shift combined insertion and deletion(24)1A
21c.763C>Tp.R255XNonsense(25-33)1B
2,14,22c.862G>Ap.V288MMissense(34)1C
23c.468C>Gp.D156EMissense(35-41)1D
20c.880C>Tp.R294XNonsense(18, 25-31, 42)1E
8c.473C>Tp.T158MMissense(18, 25-30, 42)1F
4c.397C>Tp.R133CMissense(4, 17, 25, 26, 29-31, 36, 37, 42-55)1G
12c.502C>Tp.R168XNonsense(17, 18, 24-32, 37, 38, 42, 43, 45-49, 53-57)1H
Figure 1

Electrophoretogram of patients. Refer to the text and Table 5 for an explanation of the details of each mutation

Change in genetics is in association with phonotypical manifestations. The most prevalent mutation was p.v288 which is mostly in association with partially or uncontrolled seizures. Moreover, the patients affected with this mutation show severe EEG abnormalities. In addition, we found new frameshift mutation in this study. Rett syndrome diagnostic criteria Signs and Symptoms severity assessment questionnaire Signs and symptoms for each patient * N stands for patients without genetic mutation ** Y stands for patients with genetic mutation Frequency of severity of signs and symptoms Gene mutation was studied for each patient Electrophoretogram of patients. Refer to the text and Table 5 for an explanation of the details of each mutation

Discussion

In this study, we reported the results of mutational analysis for MECP2 gene in Iranian affected RTT girls. To our knowledge, this was the first time that Rett patients were studied in both clinical manifestations and genetic changes in Iran. About 47% of patients participated in our study showed MECP2 mutation including missense, nonsense or frame shift. The rate of mutation detection in our study is equal to some previously reported rates such as the 50% detection rate. It confirms the major role of MECP2 gene mutation in etiology of Iranian patients too (16). On the other hand, there is a difference comparing to findings of another study where nearly 70%-80% of females with Rett’s syndrome had these mutations within the MECP2 gene (5). Of note, MECP2 positivity differs in various countries, as De novo mutations were found in 60% of the patients in Spain which is closer to our findings (17). This difference is also referred to the limited number of patients studied in such studies and a series of patient who refused to participate like happened in our research. This reason could explain when comparing the results of a study in Japan in which 19 disease mutations (73%) were identified in 26 Japanese Rett patients (18). The mutational diversity in our patients is consistent with the findings of other studies (16-18). In our study, about 10% of mutations were intragenic deletions or complex rearrangements that lead to frameshifts. In our study, of 10 MECP2 positive mutations, we detected one case with frameshift in the C-terminal region. Moreover, the majority of mutations was C>T transitions which were nearly 70% of all identified mutations. Similarly, the majority of mutations in our study was C>T transitions too which was about 50% in another study (19). The p.V288M amino acid change is identified as the most common mutational hotspot in our study. However, this mutation is not included in common formerly recognized hot spots. This is a new finding in patients with Rett syndrome in Iranian population. In a previous study, 70% of the mutations within MECP2 were in eight hotspots which affect translation of the amino acids including R106, R133, T158, R168, R255, R270, R294, and R306 (20). According to patients’ signs and symptoms, despite in some items like epilepsy and EEG abnormalities, MECP2 positives showed slightly higher rates compared to those without mutations, and autonomic dysfunctions were more seen in MECP2 negatives, but none of them revealed significant correlation between signs and mutations. Moreover, severity of signs and symptoms is not in relation with gene mutation and loci of mutation in our research. The only exception refers to sever EEG abnormality seen in patients with p.V288M amino acid change. Location and frequency of MeCP2 ‘‘hotspot’’ mutations in RTT patients show that most of these mutations are point substitutes in nucleotides including R106W, arginine to tryptophan point mutation at residue 106; R133C, arginine to cysteine point mutation at residue 133; T158M, threonine to methionine point mutation at residue 158; R168X, arginine to stop codon at residue 168; R255X, arginine to stop codon at residue 255; R294X, arginine to stop codon at residue 294; R306C, arginine to cysteine point mutation at residue 306. The amino acids 207and 310 of TRD are involved in the repression of transcription of target genes, but the mechanism of TRD repression is unknown (21). The study of genotype-phenotype correlation requires precise investigations in larger group of patients to determine correlation with various types of mutations. Genotype-phenotype correlation has been investigated, but it is complex by MECP2 gene X-chromosome inactivation. This inactivity allows a mother with a mutation of MECP2 to have a normal phenotype because of skewing of X-chromosome inactivation (22). In contrast to the problems with X-chromosome inactivation, many studies of genotype-phenotype correlations exist (17, 22, 23). More studies must be carried out to investigate more case to find better conclusions. In conclusion, our results together with data reported by others allow general conclusions about the MECP2 mutational spectrum and growth/developmental manifestations or phenotypes.

Author`s contribution

Parvaneh Karimzadeh: Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. Majid Kheirollahi: Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published Seyed Massoud Houshmand: Final approval of the version to be published. Sepideh Dadgar: Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved Omid Aryani: Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved Omid Yaghini: Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published (ORCID ID All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
  55 in total

1.  Mutation analysis of the methyl-CpG binding protein 2 gene (MECP2) in patients with Rett syndrome.

Authors:  K Obata; T Matsuishi; Y Yamashita; T Fukuda; K Kuwajima; I Horiuchi; S Nagamitsu; R Iwanaga; A Kimura; I Omori; S Endo; K Mori; I Kondo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Mutation spectrum in patients with Rett syndrome in the German population: Evidence of hot spot regions.

Authors:  F Laccone; P Huppke; F Hanefeld; M Meins
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Early onset seizures and Rett-like features associated with mutations in CDKL5.

Authors:  Julie C Evans; Hayley L Archer; James P Colley; Kirstine Ravn; Jytte Bieber Nielsen; Alison Kerr; Elizabeth Williams; John Christodoulou; Jozef Gécz; Philip E Jardine; Michael J Wright; Daniela T Pilz; Lazarus Lazarou; David N Cooper; Julian R Sampson; Rachel Butler; Sharon D Whatley; Angus J Clarke
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  [On a unusual brain atrophy syndrome in hyperammonemia in childhood].

Authors:  A Rett
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  1966-09-10

5.  Disruption of Netrin G1 by a balanced chromosome translocation in a girl with Rett syndrome.

Authors:  Isabella Borg; Kristine Freude; Sabine Kübart; Kirsten Hoffmann; Corinna Menzel; Franco Laccone; Helen Firth; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Niels Tommerup; Hans-Hilger Ropers; David Sargan; Vera M Kalscheuer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Phenotypic manifestations of MECP2 mutations in classical and atypical Rett syndrome.

Authors:  Carolyn Schanen; Elisa J F Houwink; Naghmeh Dorrani; Jane Lane; Ruth Everett; Alice Feng; Rita M Cantor; Alan Percy
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Neul; Walter E Kaufmann; Daniel G Glaze; John Christodoulou; Angus J Clarke; Nadia Bahi-Buisson; Helen Leonard; Mark E S Bailey; N Carolyn Schanen; Michele Zappella; Alessandra Renieri; Peter Huppke; Alan K Percy
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  DHPLC analysis of the MECP2 gene in Italian Rett patients.

Authors:  P Nicolao; M Carella; B Giometto; B Tavolato; R Cattin; M L Giovannucci-Uzielli; M Vacca; F Della Regione; S Piva; S Bortoluzzi; P Gasparini
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Diagnostic testing for Rett syndrome by DHPLC and direct sequencing analysis of the MECP2 gene: identification of several novel mutations and polymorphisms.

Authors:  I M Buyse; P Fang; K T Hoon; R E Amir; H Y Zoghbi; B B Roa
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 11.043

10.  Genetic and epileptic features in Rett syndrome.

Authors:  Hyo Jeong Kim; Shin Hye Kim; Heung Dong Kim; Joon Soo Lee; Young-Mock Lee; Kyo Yeon Koo; Jin Sung Lee; Hoon-Chul Kang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.