Literature DB >> 31645722

Similar scaling laws for earthquakes and Cascadia slow-slip events.

Sylvain Michel1,2,3, Adriano Gualandi4,5, Jean-Philippe Avouac4,6.   

Abstract

Faults can slip not only episodically during earthquakes but also during transient aseismic slip events1-5, often called slow-slip events. Previous studies based on observations compiled from various tectonic settings6-8 have suggested that the moment of slow-slip events is proportional to their duration, instead of following the duration-cubed scaling found for earthquakes9. This finding has spurred efforts to unravel the cause of the difference in scaling6,10-14. Thanks to a new catalogue of slow-slip events on the Cascadia megathrust based on the inversion of surface deformation measurements between 2007 and 201715, we find that a cubic moment-duration scaling law is more likely. Like regular earthquakes, slow-slip events also have a moment that is proportional to A3/2, where A is the rupture area, and obey the Gutenberg-Richter relationship between frequency and magnitude. Finally, these slow-slip events show pulse-like ruptures similar to seismic ruptures. The scaling properties of slow-slip events are thus strikingly similar to those of regular earthquakes, suggesting that they are governed by similar dynamic properties.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31645722     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1673-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  11 in total

1.  The High-Frequency Signature of Slow and Fast Laboratory Earthquakes.

Authors:  David C Bolton; Srisharan Shreedharan; Gregory C McLaskey; Jacques Rivière; Parisa Shokouhi; Daniel T Trugman; Chris Marone
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.390

2.  Segmentation of Shallow Slow Slip Events at the Hikurangi Subduction Zone Explained by Along-Strike Changes in Fault Geometry and Plate Convergence Rates.

Authors:  Andrea Perez-Silva; Yoshihiro Kaneko; Martha Savage; Laura Wallace; Duo Li; Charles Williams
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  Afterslip Moment Scaling and Variability From a Global Compilation of Estimates.

Authors:  R M Churchill; M J Werner; J Biggs; Å Fagereng
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Imaging evolution of Cascadia slow-slip event using high-rate GPS.

Authors:  Yuji Itoh; Yosuke Aoki; Junichi Fukuda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  What's down there? The structures, materials and environment of deep-seated slow slip and tremor.

Authors:  Whitney M Behr; Roland Bürgmann
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Fault zone heterogeneities explain depth-dependent pattern and evolution of slow earthquakes in Cascadia.

Authors:  Yingdi Luo; Zhen Liu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  InSAR data reveal that the largest hydraulic fracturing-induced earthquake in Canada, to date, is a slow-slip event.

Authors:  Thomas S Eyre; Sergey Samsonov; Wanpeng Feng; Honn Kao; David W Eaton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Probing the seismic cycle timing with coseismic twisting of subduction margins.

Authors:  F Corbi; J Bedford; P Poli; F Funiciello; Z Deng
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The predictable chaos of slow earthquakes.

Authors:  A Gualandi; J-P Avouac; S Michel; D Faranda
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Self-similarity of low-frequency earthquakes.

Authors:  M Supino; N Poiata; G Festa; J P Vilotte; C Satriano; K Obara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.