| Literature DB >> 31645674 |
Johan Sjöstrand1, Zoran Popović2,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of structural changes in a limited sample of adult preterms with foveal immaturity from optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scan images and to estimate layer displacement and changes in areal and volume magnification within the inner fovea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Layer thickness was measured in conventional and directional OCT scans from eight preterms with different degrees of foveal immaturity (24-33 weeks of gestation, 22-33 years of age) and five controls (20-33 years of age). We obtained reflectivity profiles of the outer plexiform layer (OPL) and manual segmentation data of the inner nuclear layer (INL) and the combined ganglion cell layer (GCL) and inner plexiform layer (IPL) at specified eccentricities from 300 to 900 µm. Displacement of cumulative thickness curves of preterms compared with that of the controls was used to estimate retardation of layer displacement. Changes in areal magnification and layer thickness were used to construct a structural model of redistribution within the fovea of preterms.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31645674 PMCID: PMC7253467 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-019-0627-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eye (Lond) ISSN: 0950-222X Impact factor: 3.775
Retardation and PG/C thickness, area and volume ratios at selected control group eccentricities
| Eccentricity | Retardation | PG/C thickness ratio | PG/C area ratio | PG/C volume ratio | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | PG1 | PG2 | PG3 | PG1 | PG2 | PG3 | PG1 | PG2 | PG3 | PG1 | PG2 | PG3 | |
| GCL + IPL | 300 | 31 | 113 | 252 | 1.19 | 0.84 | 2.19 | 0.80 | 0.39 | 0.03 | 0.96 | 0.33 | 0.06 |
| 500 | 48 | 120 | 313 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.13 | |
| 700 | 54 | 78 | 288 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.04 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.35 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.36 | |
| 900 | 61 | 50 | 264 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 1.11 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.55 | |
| INL | 300 | 13 | 185 | 250 | 1.01 | 1.04 | 2.03 | 0.91 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.92 | 0.15 | 0.06 |
| 500 | 10 | 171 | 315 | 1.20 | 1.13 | 1.44 | 0.96 | 0.43 | 0.14 | 1.15 | 0.49 | 0.20 | |
| 700 | 40 | 189 | 363 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.20 | 0.89 | 0.53 | 0.23 | 0.93 | 0.58 | 0.28 | |
| 900 | 70 | 222 | 412 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.05 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 0.29 | 0.81 | 0.56 | 0.31 | |
| OPL | 300 | 27 | 156 | 199 | 1.20 | 0.77 | 1.14 | 0.83 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 1.00 | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| 500 | 58 | 146 | 262 | 1.25 | 1.12 | 1.26 | 0.78 | 0.50 | 0.23 | 0.98 | 0.56 | 0.28 | |
| 700 | 65 | 151 | 279 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.36 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.38 | |
| 900 | 72 | 155 | 295 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.41 | |
GCL ganglion cell layer, IPL inner plexiform layer, INL inner nuclear layer, OPL outer plexiform layer, FC foveal centre, RT retinal thickness, FD foveal depth, IRLt IRL thickness, FDA foveal developmental arrest (HFLt + ONLt)/(IRLt + OPLt)
Fig. 1Cumulative INL layer thickness as a function of temporal eccentricity. Retardation from a specified temporal eccentricity in controls is obtained by selecting a location along the eccentricity axis, moving vertically to intersect the cumulative function of controls (C), and measuring the horizontal distance (X for PG1, Y for PG2 and Z for PG3) to the corresponding cumulative function (c.f. Packer et al. [18]). An example for the case of INL retardation at a C eccentricity of 900 µm is shown by the dashed lines (c.f. Table 1)
Fig. 2Retardation of GCL + IPL and OPL as a function of control group eccentricity. The black continuous line shows normal GC displacement and the black dashed line shows normal OPL displacement from Drasdo et al. [20]. The estimated residual displacement of GCL + IPL and OPL in PG3 within the central fovea is represented by the yellow and green shaded areas, respectively
Fig. 3A model of the structural consequences of a graded retardation of displacement of GCL + IPL, INL and OPL. Cone inner segment (IS) positions are assumed to be constant when comparing C with PG2 and PG3 at the selected control group eccentricities. An example of the corresponding positions of IS and GC at 900 µm eccentricity according to the data from Drasdo et al. [20] is shown by the vertical dotted lines. Symbol sizes of GC, INL and OPL of controls are kept constant at different eccentricities in order to facilitate comparisons of size reduction in PG2 and PG3. Structural size and area are minified in retarded layers due to the lower areal magnification caused by reduced layer displacement from the foveal centre. C—black lines; PG2—blue lines; PG3—red lines; GC—filled circles; INL—open circles; OPL—open ellipse; IS—filled ellipse
Fig. 4Areal ratios as a function of control group eccentricity for GCL + IPL, INL and OPL of PG compared with controls at corresponding eccentricities (c.f. Fig. 3)