Literature DB >> 31645638

Rapid treatment of moderate to severe hypertension using a novel protocol in a single-centre, before and after interventional study.

Andrew N Jordan1,2, Christine Anning1, Lindsay Wilkes1, Claire Ball1, Nicola Pamphilon1, Christopher E Clark3, Nicholas G Bellenger2,4, Angela C Shore1,2, Andrew S P Sharp5,6.   

Abstract

Rapid treatment to target in hypertension may have beneficial effects on long-term outcomes. This has led to a new recommendation in the 2018 European hypertension guidelines for patients with grade II/III hypertension to be treated to target within three months. However, whether it is feasible and safe to quickly manage treatment-naïve grade II/III hypertension to target was unclear. We examined this using a single-centre before and after interventional study, treating newly diagnosed, never-treated, grade II/III hypertensive patients with a daytime average systolic ABP ≥ 150 mmHg to target within 18 weeks. The proportion at office target BP at 18 weeks was determined, together with office and ambulatory BP change from baseline to after the intervention. The protocol was designed to maximise medication adherence, including a low threshold for treatment adaptation. Safety was evaluated through close monitoring of adverse events and protocol discontinuation. Fifty-five participants were enrolled with 54 completing the protocol. 69 ± 12.3% were at office target BP at their final visit, despite a high average starting BP of 175/103 mmHg, as a consequence of significant reductions in both office and ambulatory BP. Of those at office target BP, 51% were above target on ambulatory measurement. Adherence testing demonstrated that 92% of participants were adherent to treatment at their final visit. Therefore we conclude that the accelerated management of treatment-naïve grade II/III hypertension is feasible and safe to implement in routine practice and there is no evidence to suggest it causes harm. Further large-scale randomised studies of rapid, adaptive treatment, including a cost-effectiveness analysis, are required.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31645638     DOI: 10.1038/s41371-019-0272-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  31 in total

Review 1.  Bottom blood pressure or bottom cardiovascular risk? How far can cardiovascular risk be reduced?

Authors:  Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Is the rule of halves still relevant today? A cross-sectional analysis of hypertension detection, treatment and control in an urban community.

Authors:  Alice S Wu; Hiten Dodhia; David Whitney; Mark Ashworth
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  The use of highly structured care to achieve blood pressure targets.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Richard McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-11-20

4.  Resistant hypertension? Assessment of adherence by toxicological urine analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Jung; Janis L Gechter; Cora Wunder; Alexander Paulke; Christine Bartel; Helmut Geiger; Stefan W Toennes
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  A simplified approach to the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ross D Feldman; Guang Y Zou; Margaret K Vandervoort; Cindy J Wong; Sigrid A E Nelson; Brian G Feagan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Prospective study on the prevalence of secondary hypertension among hypertensive patients visiting a general outpatient clinic in Japan.

Authors:  Masao Omura; Jun Saito; Kunio Yamaguchi; Yukio Kakuta; Tetsuo Nishikawa
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Prevalence of primary and secondary hypertension: studies in a random population sample.

Authors:  G Berglund; O Andersson; L Wilhelmsen
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-04

8.  Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  David A Calhoun; Daniel Jones; Stephen Textor; David C Goff; Timothy P Murphy; Robert D Toto; Anthony White; William C Cushman; William White; Domenic Sica; Keith Ferdinand; Thomas D Giles; Bonita Falkner; Robert M Carey
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael Weber; Hans R Brunner; Steffan Ekman; Lennart Hansson; Tsushung Hua; John Laragh; Gordon T McInnes; Lada Mitchell; Francis Plat; Anthony Schork; Beverly Smith; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Effects of immediate versus delayed antihypertensive therapy on outcome in the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial.

Authors:  Jan A Staessen; Lutgarde Thijisq; Robert Fagard; Hilde Celis; Willem H Birkenhäger; Christopher J Bulpitt; Peter W de Leeuw; Astrid E Fletcher; François Forette; Gastone Leonetti; Patricia McCormack; Choudomir Nachev; Eoin O'Brien; José L Rodicio; Joseph Rosenfeld; Cinzia Sarti; Jaakko Tuomilehto; John Webster; Yair Yodfat; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Spanish MINICHAL instrument into English for use in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Andrew N Jordan; Christine Anning; Lindsay Wilkes; Claire Ball; Nicola Pamphilon; Christopher E Clark; Nicholas G Bellenger; Angela C Shore; Andrew S P Sharp; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.186

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.