Literature DB >> 31645430

Maternal Humoral Immune Responses Do Not Predict Postnatal HIV-1 Transmission Risk in Antiretroviral-Treated Mothers from the IMPAACT PROMISE Study.

Eliza D Hompe1, Denise L Jacobson2, Joshua A Eudailey3, Kevin Butler2, Whitney Edwards3,4, Justin Pollara3,4, Sean S Brummel2, Genevieve G Fouda3,5, Lameck Chinula6, Melvin Kamanga7, Aarti Kinikar8, Dhayendre Moodley9, Maxensia Owor10, Mary Glenn Fowler11, Sallie R Permar12,5.   

Abstract

To design immune interventions that can synergize with antiretroviral therapy (ART) to reduce the rate of HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), it is essential to characterize maternal immune responses in the setting of ART during pregnancy and breastfeeding and define their effect on MTCT. Prior studies reported an association between breast milk envelope (Env)-specific antibodies and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity with reduced postnatal transmission. In this study, we investigated whether these immune correlates were similarly associated with protection in a matched case-control study of mother-infant pairs receiving maternal ART or infant nevirapine prophylaxis during breastfeeding in the International Maternal-Pediatric-Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network Promoting Maternal-Infant Survival Everywhere (PROMISE) trial, assessing postnatal transmission risk in 19 transmitting and 57 nontransmitting mothers using conditional logistic regression models adjusted for maternal plasma viral load. The odds ratios of postnatal MTCT for a 1-unit increase in an immune correlate were 3.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56, 23.14) for breast milk Env-specific secretory IgA (sIgA), 2.32 (95% CI, 0.43, 12.56) for breast milk and 2.16 (95% CI, 0.51, 9.14) for plasma Env-specific IgA, and 4.57 (95% CI, 0.68, 30.48) for breast milk and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.25, 3.67) for plasma ADCC activity, with all CIs spanning 1.0. Interestingly, although mucosal IgA responses are poor in untreated HIV-infected women, there was a strong correlation between the magnitudes of breast milk and plasma Env-specific IgA in this cohort. In this analysis of the small number of postnatal virus transmissions in the landmark PROMISE study, no single antibody response was associated with breast milk transmission risk.IMPORTANCE Each year, >150,000 infants become newly infected with HIV-1 through MTCT despite ART, with up to 42% of infections occurring during breastfeeding. Several factors contribute to continued pediatric infections, including ART nonadherence, the emergence of drug-resistant HIV strains, acute infection during breastfeeding, and poor access to ART in resource-limited areas. A better understanding of the maternal humoral immune responses that provide protection against postnatal transmission in the setting of ART is critical to guide the design of maternal vaccine strategies to further eliminate postnatal HIV transmission. In this study, we found that in women treated with antiretrovirals during pregnancy, there was a positive correlation between plasma viral load and breast milk and plasma IgA responses; however, conclusions regarding odds of MTCT risk were limited by the small sample size. These findings will inform future studies to investigate maternal immune interventions that can synergize with ART to eliminate MTCT during breastfeeding.
Copyright © 2019 Hompe et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADCC; HIV-1; antibodies; antiretroviral therapy; breast milk; postnatal transmission

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31645430      PMCID: PMC7407004          DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00716-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mSphere        ISSN: 2379-5042            Impact factor:   4.389


INTRODUCTION

With optimal maternal antiretroviral therapy (ART) and infant prophylaxis, the rate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission through breastfeeding has been significantly reduced, to less than 5% (1–5). However, several factors contribute to continued infant exposure to HIV during breastfeeding and thus a risk of vertical transmission, including nonadherence to ART, acute maternal infections, and loss to care, primarily in resource-limited areas (6). Postnatal HIV-1 transmission accounts for up to 42% of the overall mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rate, and the risk of transmission remains constant for the duration of breastfeeding (7, 8). In addition to high maternal plasma viral load and low peripheral CD4+ T cell count, risk factors specific to breast milk transmission include breast milk viral load and breast pathologies, including mastitis or abscess (8–10). As a result, strategies to prevent transmission focusing on avoidance or early cessation of breastfeeding have been tested. Yet formula feeding is associated with increased infant morbidity due to diarrheal illnesses and poor nutrition in developing countries (11, 12). Moreover, early weaning to decrease the duration of breastfeeding, and thus infant exposure to HIV-1, led to higher mortality in HIV-infected infants (13). Infants receiving mixed feeding compared to exclusively breastfed infants are also at increased risk of postnatal HIV-1 transmission and have higher mortality in the first few months of life (14, 15). As a result, current World Health Organization guidelines recommend universal breastfeeding in HIV-infected mothers in resource-limited regions (16). Therefore, alternative interventions to avoid transmission of HIV through breastfeeding will be needed to eliminate postnatal MTCT. Even in the absence of maternal ART, the majority of HIV-exposed, breastfeeding infants remain uninfected, suggesting that there may be maternal humoral immune responses in breast milk that protect against infant HIV-1 acquisition (17, 18). There are conflicting data on the role of virus envelope (Env)-specific antibodies (Abs) in breast milk in protection against postpartum transmission. Several studies have found no association between HIV-1 Env-specific Abs and risk of postpartum transmission (19, 20). One group reported that Env-specific secretory IgA (sIgA) was detected more frequently in transmitting than in nontransmitting mothers, suggesting that it is not protective and may instead be associated with increased transmission risk (21). Further work has evaluated the role of neutralizing and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity in breast milk in transmitting and nontransmitting mothers (22). While there are low levels of neutralizing antibodies in breast milk of all HIV-infected mothers, high ADCC activity has been reported in nontransmitting compared to transmitting mothers (22). These findings suggest that nonneutralizing antibody functions in breast milk may help reduce postnatal transmission risk and merit further investigation in larger immune correlate studies of postnatal MTCT. Our group recently investigated the immune correlates of postnatal transmission of HIV-1 in a cohort of clade C HIV-1-infected transmitting (n = 22) and matched nontransmitting (n = 65) women from the control arm of the Malawian Breastfeeding, Antiretrovirals, and Nutrition (BAN) clinical trial (23). Of note, these mothers only received postnatal ART prophylaxis around delivery, providing an opportunity to probe the relationship between natural immunologic factors and postnatal transmission risk. Importantly, the study identified that the magnitude of Env-specific IgA and sIgA responses in breast milk directed against a consensus Env gp140 antigen were significantly associated with reduced risk of postnatal HIV-1 transmission (23). These findings indicate that a viable strategy for decreasing postnatal transmission of HIV-1 to infants could be a maternal vaccine that boosts Env-specific IgA responses in breast milk. However, as the mothers in the BAN cohort did not receive postnatal ART, the current standard of care, it is important to investigate whether these previously defined breast milk immune correlates are important for protection in mother-infant pairs receiving postnatal prophylaxis. In this study, we aimed to determine whether breast milk Env-specific IgA and sIgA are similarly predictive of transmission risk in the setting of maternal ART or infant nevirapine (NVP) prophylaxis during breastfeeding. We studied a cohort of postnatally transmitting (n = 19) and nontransmitting (n = 57) mothers from the breastfeeding arm of the International Maternal-Pediatric-Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) network Promoting Maternal-Infant Survival Everywhere (PROMISE) 1077BF (Breastfeeding) protocol (24). Postnatal transmission rates in the postpartum component of the PROMISE trial were 0.6% and 0.9% for the maternal ART and infant NVP arms, respectively (5). We assessed levels of maternal HIV Env-binding and functional plasma and breast milk antibody responses and their association with postnatal HIV-1 transmission. This work provides valuable insight into the role of maternal Env-specific HIV-1 antibody responses in postnatal transmission with standard-of-care therapy. Furthermore, it presents a novel characterization of the magnitude and breadth of immune responses across breast milk and plasma in women who received ART during pregnancy, which has not previously been described. This study will inform the design of maternal immune interventions that can synergize with ART to prevent MTCT and improve the safety of breastfeeding.

RESULTS

High plasma viral loads and lower peripheral CD4+ T cell counts in postnatally transmitting compared to those in nontransmitting mothers.

Transmitting and nontransmitting mothers were similar on age, gestational age of the infant at birth, sex of the infant, and postpartum randomization to maternal ART or infant NVP prophylaxis (Table 1). However, of note, transmitting women had higher plasma viral loads at the time of measurement closest to transmission than did matched nontransmitting women {median [quartile 1 (Q1) to quartile 3 (Q3) of the interquartile range], 4.20 [3.24 to 4.96] versus 2.15 [1.59 to 3.31] log10 copies/ml}. In addition, 89% of transmitting women had a plasma viral load of >1,000 copies/ml prior to transmission, compared to only 35% of the nontransmitting women. Transmitting women also had lower CD4+ T cell counts than nontransmitting women (median [Q1 to Q3], 563 [425 to 839] versus 743 [621 to 935] cells/mm3). Finally, transmitting women had fewer previous births than did nontransmitting women (median maternal parity of 2 versus 5, including PROMISE delivery).
TABLE 1

Clinical characteristics of postnatal transmitting and matched nontransmitting HIV-1-infected mothers from the PROMISE 1077BF study

Characteristica Values for subjects with indicated transmission status
Transmitter (n = 19)Nontransmitter (n = 57)
Maternal age (yrs)
    Min–max18–3818–36
    Median (Q1–Q3)24 (23–29)26 (23–29)
Maternal viral load (log10 copies/ml), first measurement after delivery
    Min–max1.48–5.571.30–5.25
    Median (Q1–Q3)3.97 (2.52–5.00)2.22 (1.60–2.68)
    Undetectable3 (16%)17 (30%)
    Detectable and <1,000 copies/ml3 (16%)29 (51%)
    ≥1,000 copies/ml13 (68%)11 (19%)
Maternal viral load (log10 copies/ml), measurement closest to transmission
    Min–max1.59–5.471.28–5.25
    Median (Q1–Q3)4.20 (3.24–4.96)2.15 (1.59–3.31)
    Undetectable1 (5%)24 (42%)
    Detectable and <1,000 copies/ml1 (5%)13 (23%)
    ≥1,000 copies/ml17 (89%)20 (35%)
Maternal peripheral CD4+ T cell count (cells/mm3), measurement after delivery
    Min–max188–1,337366–1,606
    Median (Q1–Q3)563 (425–839)743 (621–935)
Maternal peripheral CD4+ T cell count (cells/mm3), closest to transmission
    Min–max270–1,337314–1,606
    Median (Q1–Q3)560 (436–795)743 (628–966)
Gestational age at birth (wks)
    Min–max35–4130–48
    Median (Q1–Q3)38 (36–40)38 (35–39)
Sex of child
    M8 (42%)22 (39%)
    F11 (58%)35 (61%)
Maternal parity, including PROMISE delivery
    Min–max1–51–9
    Median (Q1–Q3)2 (2–3)5 (4–6)
Country
    India1 (5%)3 (5%)
    Malawi12 (63%)36 (63%)
    South Africa2 (11%)6 (11%)
    Uganda4 (21%)12 (21%)
PP component randomizationb
    Maternal triple ART8 (42%)26 (46%)
    Infant prophylaxis6 (32%)26 (46%)
    AP observation follow-up5 (26%)5 (9%)
Age of infant at breast milk specimen collection prior to transmission (wks)
    Min–max1–741–74
    Median (Q1–Q3)26 (6–50)26 (6–50)
Infant age at infection (wks)
    Min–max6–87
    Median (Q1–Q3)38 (14–74)

Min, minimum; max, maximum; M, male; F, female.

In the maternal triple-ART arm, the mother received lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV-RTV) plus tenofovir-emtricitabine (TDF/FTC). In the infant prophylaxis arm, the infant received nevirapine (NVP). In the AP observation follow-up, the mother received a triple-ART regimen until the week 1 postpartum visit.

Clinical characteristics of postnatal transmitting and matched nontransmitting HIV-1-infected mothers from the PROMISE 1077BF study Min, minimum; max, maximum; M, male; F, female. In the maternal triple-ART arm, the mother received lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV-RTV) plus tenofovir-emtricitabine (TDF/FTC). In the infant prophylaxis arm, the infant received nevirapine (NVP). In the AP observation follow-up, the mother received a triple-ART regimen until the week 1 postpartum visit.

Maternal Env-specific IgA levels and ADCC activity are correlated across breast milk and plasma compartments.

While Env-specific IgG and ADCC activity in plasma and breast milk are consistently directly correlated, we have previously described a lack of correlation between HIV-1 Env-binding IgA responses in breast milk and plasma (25). We examined correlations between IgA and ADCC responses across breast milk and plasma compartments (Table 2). The magnitude of total IgA binding responses against clade B HIV-1 consensus gp140 antigen (B.con gp140) was positively correlated between breast milk and plasma (ρ = 0.683 and P < 0.001). ADCC antibody titer and potency were weakly correlated across the two compartments (ρ = 0.317 and P = 0.005 for ADCC antibody titer; ρ = 0.315 and P = 0.006 for potency).
TABLE 2

Correlations of primary and secondary maternal immune variables across breast milk and plasma compartments

Immune response: breast milk vs plasmaSpearman correlation coefficient (P value)
Total IgA against HIV-1 B.con gp1400.683 (<0.001)
ADCC antibody titer0.317 (0.005)
ADCC potency (maximum % killing)0.315 (0.006)
Correlations of primary and secondary maternal immune variables across breast milk and plasma compartments

Primary analysis: breast milk Env-specific IgA and sIgA binding response and ADCC antibody titer association with postnatal transmission risk.

We investigated whether breast milk total IgA and sIgA directed against B.con gp140 and breast milk ADCC responses were associated with postnatal transmission in this cohort. The odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI], P value) of postnatal transmission for each 1-unit increase in breast milk total IgA against B.con gp140 was 2.32 (0.43, 12.56) and that for sIgA against B.con gp140 was 3.61 (0.56, 23.14) (Table 3). Env-specific binding Ab responses in breast milk had, on inspection, higher median levels in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (median log10 AUC [area under the curve], −0.14 versus −0.40 and −0.19 versus −0.37 for total IgA and sIgA, respectively) (Fig. 1A and B). A sizable proportion of mothers had undetectable functional ADCC activity in breast milk (5/19 [26%] of transmitting women and 23/57 [40%] of nontransmitting women), and the odds ratio of HIV-1 transmission for breast milk ADCC antibody titer was 4.57 (0.68, 30.48; P = 0.12) (Table 3 and Fig. 1C).
TABLE 3

Associations of HIV Env-specific breast milk and plasma antibody responses and HIV-1 transmission to the infant

AnalysisImmune responseAssayOdds ratio (95% CI)a P value
Primary immune variableBreast milk total IgA against HIV-1 B.con gp140ELISA2.32 (0.43, 12.56)0.33
Breast milk sIgA against HIV-1 B.con gp140b ELISA3.61 (0.56, 23.14)0.18
Breast milk ADCC antibody titerb ADCC-Luc4.57 (0.68, 30.48)0.12
Secondary immune variablePlasma total IgA against HIV-1 B.con gp140ELISA2.16 (0.51, 9.14)0.30
Plasma ADCC antibody titerb ADCC-Luc0.96 (0.25, 3.67)0.95
Breast milk ADCC potencyADCC-Luc1.02 (0.95, 1.08)0.61
Plasma ADCC potencyADCC-Luc1.04 (0.96, 1.13)0.30

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ELISA area under the curve and ADCC antibody titer and potency were determined by logistic regression modeling controlling for log10 plasma viral load. Odds ratios greater than 1 indicate higher odds of transmission for a 1-unit change in the immune response levels.

Immune response is dichotomous, with categories of below the lower limit of detection (LLD) and above the LLD. The odds ratio interprets as above the LLD relative to below the LLD.

FIG 1

Magnitudes of breast milk Env-specific IgA and sIgA binding responses by ELISA and functional ADCC antibody titers in transmitting and nontransmitting mothers. The magnitude of breast milk total IgA (A) and sIgA (B) binding to B.con gp140, measured as the area under the curve by ELISA, was higher in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (median log10 AUC, −0.14 versus −0.40 and −0.19 versus −0.37). Breast milk ADCC Ab titer (C) was also higher in transmitting compared to nontransmitting women (median log10 ADCC Ab titer, 1.39 versus 1.31). Medians are represented by horizontal black lines. The box represents the interquartile range, and the dashed lines extend to the highest and lowest values.

Associations of HIV Env-specific breast milk and plasma antibody responses and HIV-1 transmission to the infant Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ELISA area under the curve and ADCC antibody titer and potency were determined by logistic regression modeling controlling for log10 plasma viral load. Odds ratios greater than 1 indicate higher odds of transmission for a 1-unit change in the immune response levels. Immune response is dichotomous, with categories of below the lower limit of detection (LLD) and above the LLD. The odds ratio interprets as above the LLD relative to below the LLD. Magnitudes of breast milk Env-specific IgA and sIgA binding responses by ELISA and functional ADCC antibody titers in transmitting and nontransmitting mothers. The magnitude of breast milk total IgA (A) and sIgA (B) binding to B.con gp140, measured as the area under the curve by ELISA, was higher in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (median log10 AUC, −0.14 versus −0.40 and −0.19 versus −0.37). Breast milk ADCC Ab titer (C) was also higher in transmitting compared to nontransmitting women (median log10 ADCC Ab titer, 1.39 versus 1.31). Medians are represented by horizontal black lines. The box represents the interquartile range, and the dashed lines extend to the highest and lowest values.

Secondary analysis: plasma Env-specific IgA binding responses, plasma ADCC antibody titer, and plasma and breast milk ADCC potency association with MTCT risk.

A secondary analysis was conducted to determine if the magnitude of HIV Env-specific binding antibody responses in plasma, ADCC antibody titer in plasma, and ADCC potency in breast milk or plasma were associated with risk of postnatal HIV transmission. The odds ratios for postnatal transmission of HIV were 2.16 (0.51, 9.14) for plasma total IgA against B.con gp140, 0.96 (0.25, 3.67) for plasma ADCC antibody titer, and 1.04 (0.96, 1.13) for plasma ADCC potency (Table 3). In addition, for breast milk ADCC potency the odds ratio of HIV-1 transmission to the infant was 1.02 (0.95, 1.08) (Table 3). Interestingly, all of these immune responses had higher median levels in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (Fig. 2).
FIG 2

Magnitudes of plasma Env-specific IgA binding responses by ELISA, plasma ADCC antibody titer, and plasma and breast milk ADCC potency in transmitting and nontransmitting women. The magnitude of plasma total IgA (A) binding to B.con gp140, measured as the area under the curve by ELISA, was higher in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (median log10 AUC, 0.01 versus 0.48). Plasma ADCC Ab titer (B) was also higher in transmitting women than in nontransmitting women (median log10 ADCC Ab titer, 2.29 versus 2.09). Plasma (C) and breast milk (D) ADCC potencies, as maximum percent specific killing, were higher in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (median max percent specific killing, 26.06 versus 25.00, and 27.66 versus 25.86). Medians are represented by horizontal black lines. The box represents the interquartile range, and the dashed lines extend to the highest and lowest values.

Magnitudes of plasma Env-specific IgA binding responses by ELISA, plasma ADCC antibody titer, and plasma and breast milk ADCC potency in transmitting and nontransmitting women. The magnitude of plasma total IgA (A) binding to B.con gp140, measured as the area under the curve by ELISA, was higher in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (median log10 AUC, 0.01 versus 0.48). Plasma ADCC Ab titer (B) was also higher in transmitting women than in nontransmitting women (median log10 ADCC Ab titer, 2.29 versus 2.09). Plasma (C) and breast milk (D) ADCC potencies, as maximum percent specific killing, were higher in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (median max percent specific killing, 26.06 versus 25.00, and 27.66 versus 25.86). Medians are represented by horizontal black lines. The box represents the interquartile range, and the dashed lines extend to the highest and lowest values.

Breast milk sIgA and plasma IgA responses correlate with maternal plasma viral load.

As transmitting women had higher median plasma viral loads than nontransmitting women (Table 1), we performed correlations between each antibody response and plasma viral load to assess whether this association could explain the higher median levels of immune correlates that we observed in transmitting than in nontransmitting women (Table 4). Maternal plasma viral load was positively correlated with breast milk sIgA (ρ = 0.248 and P = 0.03) and plasma total IgA binding to B.con gp140 (ρ = 0.294 and P = 0.01). Correlations were very weak between maternal viral load and all other measured immune parameters, including breast milk total IgA binding to B.con gp140, breast milk ADCC antibody titer and potency, and plasma ADCC antibody titer and potency (Table 4).
TABLE 4

Correlations of maternal plasma viral load and HIV Env-specific breast milk and plasma antibody responses and ADCC activity

Immune responseSpearman correlation coefficient (P value)
Breast milk total IgA against HIV-1 B.con env03 gp140 by ELISA0.223 (0.053)
Breast milk sIgA against HIV-1 B.con env03 gp140 by ELISA0.248 (0.030)
Breast milk ADCC antibody titer−0.058 (0.62)
Plasma total IgA against HIV-1 B.con env03 gp140 by ELISA0.294 (0.010)
Plasma ADCC antibody titer0.073 (0.53)
Breast milk ADCC potency0.026 (0.82)
Plasma ADCC potency0.039 (0.74)
Correlations of maternal plasma viral load and HIV Env-specific breast milk and plasma antibody responses and ADCC activity

Secondary analysis: breast milk and plasma Env epitope-specific binding antibody responses association with postnatal transmission risk.

In further secondary analysis, we assessed the magnitude of breast milk and plasma Env-specific binding antibody responses against a panel of HIV-1 Env antigens and their association with postnatal transmission risk (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). We measured Env-specific IgG and IgA responses in plasma and Env-specific IgG, IgA, and sIgA responses in breast milk by binding antibody multiplex assay (BAMA). Overall, the magnitude of these Env epitope-specific antibody responses in either compartment and transmission risk in the logistic regression model did not show any conclusive associations after correction for multiple comparisons (Table S1). Of note, the 95% confidence intervals in this analysis were large. Associations of HIV Env-specific binding antibody responses to a panel of HIV-1 antigens in breast milk and plasma and HIV-1 transmission to the infant. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined by logistic regression modelling controlling for log10 plasma viral load. aImmune response is dichotomous, with categories of below the lower limit of detection (LLD) and above the LLD. The odds ratio interprets as above the LLD relative to below the LLD. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB. However, several plasma and breast milk IgG binding responses were positively associated with postnatal transmission risk prior to correction for multiple comparisons (results for multiple comparisons are shown in Table S1). Plasma IgG responses directed against three HIV Env epitopes—the V3 loop peptide, a consensus clade B gp120 protein, and the V1V2 region from a clade C virus—were positively associated with increased transmission risk (OR = 3.92 [1.04, 14.69] and P = 0.04; OR = 10.56 [1.13, 98.26] and P = 0.04; OR = 3.36 [1.08, 10.49] and P = 0.04). In addition, breast milk IgG directed against the consensus clade B gp120 epitope was similarly associated with increased postnatal transmission risk (OR = 4.49 [1.13, 17.83] and P = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we assessed HIV Env-specific binding and functional antibody responses in breast milk and plasma and their association with postnatal HIV-1 transmission risk in women treated with antiretrovirals (ARVs) during pregnancy who received variable postnatal prophylaxis in the IMPAACT PROMISE study. A comparison of Env-specific antibody responses in breast milk versus plasma has not been reported for low-risk transmitting women and has key implications for the development of vaccine interventions to eliminate postnatal HIV transmission. Prior studies have consistently demonstrated that in HIV/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection, there is an impaired IgA response in breast milk and other mucosal compartments (26–28). While Env-specific IgG and ADCC activity in plasma and breast milk were directly correlated, we previously described the lack of correlation between HIV-1 Env-binding IgA responses in breast milk and plasma in a cohort of HIV-infected women with minimal ART coverage (25). Yet in this cohort, we found that Env-specific IgA binding responses were highly correlated in breast milk and plasma and were comparable in magnitude. Breast milk B.con gp140-specific total IgA and sIgA responses were inconclusive as to the risk of postnatal transmission in regression models adjusted for maternal viral load, with point estimates inconsistent with previous findings from the BAN study (23). Plasma Env-specific IgA binding responses, plasma and breast milk ADCC activity, and Env epitope-specific binding antibody responses were also not significantly associated with MTCT risk. As our analyses were limited by the small number of transmitting women in this cohort, we are unable to make definitive conclusions about the association of maternal antibody responses with postnatal transmission risk. We found moderate correlations between the magnitudes of plasma IgA, breast milk IgA, and breast milk sIgA binding to B.con gp140 and maternal plasma viral load, suggesting that the high levels of binding antibody responses observed in transmitting, healthy women could be at least partially driven by ongoing virus replication and antigen exposure. Our analyses of breast milk and plasma maternal ADCC activity revealed no conclusive association with transmission risk and thus contribute to an ongoing debate regarding the potentially protective role of ADCC in postnatal transmission. Prior work has shown that ADCC responses may contribute to better viral control in chronic SIV infection (29, 30) and mediate partial protection in SIV-challenged rhesus monkeys (31). However, several human studies have shown no association between maternal ADCC responses and risk of HIV-1 transmission (23, 32). Milligan et al. evaluated the ADCC activity of antibodies passively transferred from HIV-infected mothers to their infants and found higher levels of ADCC activity in uninfected than in infected infants (32). ADCC activity in infected infants was also associated with decreased mortality, suggesting that it may mediate disease progression and contribute to improved clinical outcomes in HIV infection. Mabuka et al. recently demonstrated higher levels of Env gp120-specific ADCC activity in breast milk in nontransmitting than in transmitting mothers, further implicating ADCC as a potentially protective immune correlate (22). However, this study selected women with high viral loads and systemic neutralizing antibodies. It is possible that maternal ADCC responses are protective only in the setting of high antigen burden, supported by the fact that in our study, one-third of mothers had ADCC titers below the limit of detection. Sun et al. (30) also found an association between ADCC responses and improved viral control in SIV infection when rhesus monkeys were stratified by viral load and those with low viral load excluded. Our analysis facilitates a comparison to prior studies examining immune parameters that are associated with postnatal transmission risk in different cohorts of transmitting and nontransmitting HIV-infected, breastfeeding women (Table 5). Studies by Mabuka et al., Kuhn et al., and Pollara et al. examined immune correlates in women from the Kenyan Breastfeeding versus Formula Feeding Study, Zambia Exclusive Breastfeeding Study, and BAN trial, respectively (21–23). The cohorts were comprised of clade C-infected women and had comparable sample sizes, with the exception of the study by Mabuka et al., which compared 9 transmitting to 10 nontransmitting women, all clade A infected. The PROMISE cohort included clade C-infected women from Malawi, India, and South Africa, as well as clade A- and D-infected women from Uganda. Women in the PROMISE antepartum (AP) component randomized to maternal triple ART or monotherapy received more ARVs, with better maternal immune status than that of women in the other studies. However, postnatal prophylaxis in the PROMISE study varied, with mothers randomized to receive triple ART for the duration of breastfeeding (42%), to receive 7 to 14 days of ART postpartum (26%), or to the infant nevirapine prophylaxis arm (32%).
TABLE 5

Comparison of the PROMISE analysis and prior studies of maternal humoral immune correlates of postnatal transmission in different cohorts of transmitting and nontransmitting HIV-infected breastfeeding women

ParameterMabuka et al., 2012 (22)Kuhn et al., 2006 (21)Pollara et al., 2015 (23)Hompe et al., 2019 (this study)
Study cohortKenya Breastfeeding vs. Formula Feeding StudyZambia Exclusive Breastfeeding StudyMalawi Breastfeeding, Antiretrovirals, and Nutrition StudyAfrican multisite Promoting Maternal and Infant Survival Everywhere Study
Sample size9 transmitting and 10 nontransmitting mothers26 transmitting and 64 nontransmitting mothers22 transmitting and 65 nontransmitting mothers19 transmitting and 57 nontransmitting mothers
Viral clade of infectionClade AClade CClade CClade C (Malawi, India, South Africa); clade A/D (Uganda)
ART administrationNo maternal ARTSingle-dose nevirapineSingle-dose nevirapine at onset of labor and then 7 days of zidovudine/lamivudineMaternal triple ART or infant nevirapine prophylaxis
Maternal immune statusNo CD4+ T cell count restrictionNo CD4+ T cell count restrictionCD4+ T cell count >200CD4+ T cell count of >350
Breast milk humoral immune variables and their association with transmission risk
ADCC activityPositively associated with nontransmissionNot studiedNot associated with transmissionNot associated with transmission
Env-specific IgANot associated with transmissionNot studiedPositively associated with nontransmissionNot associated with transmission
Env-specific sIgANot studiedNot associated with transmissionPositively associated with nontransmissionNot associated with transmission
Comparison of the PROMISE analysis and prior studies of maternal humoral immune correlates of postnatal transmission in different cohorts of transmitting and nontransmitting HIV-infected breastfeeding women Differences in maternal humoral immune responses associated with postnatal transmission were observed across studies. Mabuka et al. (22) reported that ADCC activity was associated with reduced postnatal transmission risk in a cohort of untreated women, in contrast to the subsequent analyses which have shown no clear association between breast milk ADCC activity and postnatal transmission risk in mothers receiving ART. With regard to HIV Env-specific antibody responses, Kuhn et al. (21) found that sIgA was detected more often in breast milk of 26 postnatal transmitting mothers (76.9%) than in that of 64 nontransmitting mothers (46.9%; P = 0.009) and thus did not appear to be protective against MTCT. Pollara et al. (23) identified total IgA and sIgA binding to B.con gp140 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and BAMA, respectively, as being associated with decreased postnatal transmission risk in women who received only peripartum nevirapine, while this analysis of the small number of postnatal infections that occurred in the PROMISE study was inconclusive as to the association of maternal humoral immune responses with postnatal transmission risk. It is possible that previously identified antibody responses are not as robust and do not mediate any protective benefit in the setting of better-controlled viremia due to ARV use throughout pregnancy and immediately postpartum. While our study is unique in its assessment of maternal antibody responses and transmission risk in the setting of ARV use during pregnancy and postpartum, it had several limitations. The analysis was underpowered, limited by sample size due to the small number of transmissions during breastfeeding. Unfortunately, due to issues with shipping and transportation from study sites in Tanzania and Zimbabwe, only 76 of 104 originally requested samples were available for inclusion in the study. Sample size limited our ability to perform analyses stratified by postpartum ARV status or the type of peripartum ARV regimen. Larger studies using cohorts of ART-treated women should be done to better define the association between maternal binding antibody responses and ADCC activity and postnatal transmission risk. Further study also needs to evaluate the effect of potential confounding factors—adherence and the development of drug resistance—on postnatal transmission risk in the setting of lifetime maternal ART. In addition, another opportunity for future study could include analyzing the data by study site to determine the effect of geographical areas, HIV clade, and coexisting infections on humoral immune responses and postnatal transmission. This could not be done in the current case-control study because study site was a matching criterion. Interestingly, our work suggests that ARV use during pregnancy significantly alters the nature of breast milk IgA responses, eliminating the deficiency in mucosal IgA typically observed in HIV-infected women (26–28). In women treated with ARVs in pregnancy and at low risk of transmission postpartum due to optimal prophylaxis, antibody responses and viral replication may be strongly correlated and thus antibody responses may not independently affect transmission risk. Our prior observation that maternal humoral immune responses in breast milk are associated with protection against postnatal HIV transmission was not confirmed in this small cohort of low-risk transmitters, yet it merits further study. As highly active ART is the standard of care worldwide, investigating immune correlates of protection in cohorts of well-treated women is critical to the design of strategies to augment infant protection and achieve complete elimination of MTCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and participants.

The 1077BF protocol of the IMPAACT PROMISE study enrolled HIV-infected, postpartum women who intended to breastfeed and had CD4+ T cell counts of ≥350 cells/mm3 between June 2011 and October 2014 (5). Mothers were followed until the trial ended, and their infants were followed through 24 months of age. For this analysis, study participants came from 3 components of the 1077BF protocol, antepartum (AP), postpartum (PP), and late presenters (LP) (Fig. S1). PROMISE 1077BF study components and participants included in the immune correlates analysis. This schema depicts the selection of study participants from the 3 components of the PROMISE 1077BF study (antepartum [AP], postpartum [PP], and late presenters [LP]) and the prophylaxis regimen of each mother. The number of MTCT cases in each component is shown, as are the reasons for exclusion of particular cases from the immune correlates analysis. Overall, there were 19 mothers who transmitted HIV-1 during breastfeeding who met the criteria for this study and had samples available (n = 5 from AP component, n = 13 from PP component, and n = 1 from LP component). They were matched in a 1:3 overall ratio to nontransmitting women (n = 5 from AP component and n = 52 from PP component). Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.1 MB. In the AP component, HIV-infected mothers (n = 3,543) were randomized during pregnancy at ≥14 weeks of gestation to receive triple ART (lopinavir-ritonavir [LPV/r], zidovudine [ZDV], and lamivudine or LPV/r plus tenofovir-emtricitabine [TDF/FTC]), or ZDV with a single dose of nevirapine (NVP) and TDF/FTC tail. In the LP component, participants (n = 204) were identified as HIV infected in labor or immediately postpartum (up to 5 days). LP participants were assigned to treatments based on their time of registration and previous treatment use. Participants who remained in LP instead of transitioning to PP after delivery were followed for 6 weeks. Finally, both the AP and LP component participants were able to enroll into the PP component if eligible. PP participants were randomized at 6 to 14 days postpartum to maternal ART or infant NVP prophylaxis, continuing through 18 months after delivery or until cessation of breastfeeding or infant HIV-1 infection. Infants in the maternal ART arm also received 6 weeks of NVP. A total of 2,431 mother-infant pairs were enrolled in the PP component (n = 1,220 for maternal ART and n = 1,211 for infant NVP); 95% were recruited from the AP component and 5% from the LP component. In our study, cases were defined as children who tested positive for HIV during the breastfeeding period and had a minimum breast milk sample volume required for testing from the transmitting mother prior to infection (n = 26). The time of transmission was defined as the first of two consecutive positive infant HIV nucleic acid tests. Twenty-six cases were identified at 9 sites across 6 countries (India [1 site], Malawi [2], South Africa [1], Tanzania [1], Uganda [1], and Zimbabwe [3]). Seven of the 26 transmission cases had unavailable samples. The 19 postnatal transmission cases with available samples were matched to uninfected infants (controls) in a 3:1 ratio for a total of 57 controls. Cases and controls were matched on the following criteria: adequate sample volumes required for planned assays, nontransmitting mothers whose infants were uninfected at the same study week as the transmission occurred in the cases, availability of samples at the same study week or within 3 months prior to the sample time point for the transmitting mother, and clinical site. The maternal prophylaxis regimens during pregnancy and the postpartum period are detailed in Fig. S1.

Ethics statement.

Approval for the PROMISE 1077BF Protocol was obtained from all local institutional review boards and regulatory authorities. All women who participated in the trial provided written informed consent. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of AIDS Multinational Data and Safety Monitoring Board reviewed the study every 6 months. This immune-correlate laboratory analysis of the PROMISE 1077BF study was deemed exempt from human subject review by the Duke University institutional review board (Pro00030437).

ADCC assay.

Plasma and delipidized breast milk (33) were evaluated for antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity using a luciferase-based assay as previously described (23, 34). CEM.NKRCCR5 (35) target cells were infected with an infectious molecular clone virus that encodes the HIV-1 subtype C envelope from the breast milk transmitted/founder virus isolate 4403BMC5 (36) in the NL4-3 isogenic backbone, which contains a Renilla luciferase reporter gene (37). The frequency of cells expressing intracellular p24 was used to confirm and monitor infections, and greater than 70% of target cells were p24 positive in all assays. Cryopreserved human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from an HIV-seronegative donor homozygous for the low-affinity single nucleotide polymorphism variant of Fcγ receptor IIIa (158F) were used as a source of effector cells at an effector-to-target cell ratio of 30:1 (38, 39). Plasma and breast milk samples were tested after 5-fold serial dilutions starting at 1:50 and 1:10, respectively, in duplicate. Percent specific killing was measured after a 6-h incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2 and was determined by reduction in luminescence (ViviRen assay; Promega) compared to that of control wells containing target and effector cells in the absence of plasma or breast milk according to the following formula: percent specific killing = [(number of RLU of target and effector well − number of RLU of test well)/number of RLU of target and effector well] × 100. The ADCC endpoint titers were determined by interpolating the dilutions of plasma or breast milk that intersected the positive threshold for killing (20% specific killing) and are reported as reciprocal dilutions.

BAMA.

HIV-1 Env-specific IgG, IgA, and sIgA responses against a panel of HIV-1 antigens were detected by binding antibody multiplex assay (BAMA), as previously described (33, 40). Carboxylated fluorescent beads (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) coupled with HIV-1 antigens (Table S2) were incubated with diluted plasma or breast milk for 30 min at 20°C. Plasma was IgG depleted prior to measuring Env-specific IgA and sIgA, as previously described (25, 33). HIV Env-specific IgG and IgA were detected with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated mouse anti-human IgG (Southern Biotech) and PE-conjugated goat anti-human IgA (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), respectively. Env-specific sIgA was detected with mouse anti-human secretory component (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by goat anti-mouse IgG-PE (Southern Biotech). Beads were washed and acquired on a Bio-Plex 200 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Amino acid sequences and sample dilutions for antigens used in BAMA assays. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB. To determine the optimal sample dilution for each antigen, optimization assays with serial dilutions of a subset of plasma and breast milk samples were performed. All samples were analyzed at the same dilution for each antigen (Table S2). Blank beads were used to account for nonspecific binding, and HIV immunoglobulin (HIVIG) was used as a positive control. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values were background adjusted by subtracting the MFI values of coupled beads without sample. For IgA assays, MFI values were also blank-bead subtracted to account for nonspecific binding at the low sample dilutions used. A positive HIV-1 Env-specific antibody response was an MFI of >100. All assays tracked the 50% effective concentration and maximum MFI of HIVIG by Levey-Jennings charts to ensure interassay consistency.

ELISA.

For enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 384-well plates (Corning Life Sciences) were coated at 30 ng/well with B.con env03 gp140, incubated at 4°C overnight, and blocked with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% whey protein, 15% normal goat serum, and 0.5% Tween 20. Serially diluted breast milk or IgG-depleted plasma samples were added. IgA was detected with goat anti-human IgA horseradish peroxidase (HRP; Southern Biotech), and sIgA was detected with mouse anti-human secretory component (Sigma-Aldrich), followed by goat anti-mouse IgG HRP (Southern Biotech). Plates were developed with SureBlue Reserve substrate and stop solution (VWR) and read at 450 nm on a SpectraMax Plus 384 microplate reader (Molecular Devices). The standard for IgA measurement was VRC01 monomeric IgA. The standard for sIgA assays was CH31 sIgA, prepared by complexing CH31 dimeric IgA with human secretory component (Abcam) in a 1:1 molar ratio (41). A five-parameter curve was used to calculate IgA/sIgA concentrations relative to the respective standard (SoftMax Pro 6.3; Molecular Devices).

Statistical analysis.

Maternal and infant characteristics were summarized by case-control status using the minimum, maximum, mean (standard deviation [SD]), and median (Q1, Q3) for continuous variables and number (percent) for categorical variables (Table 1). The distribution of values for breast milk and plasma immune responses were summarized by the minimum, maximum, mean (SD), and median (Q1, Q3) (Table S3). If any immune response had >30% of the values below the lower limit of detection (LLD), a dichotomous measure of the immune response was used, with categories of below LLD and above LLD (Table S3). Correlations were investigated with Spearman correlation coefficients, and their respective P values, for cases and controls combined, between each immune response in plasma and breast milk, between immune responses and maternal plasma viral load, and between ADCC potency and plasma Env-specific IgG. Conditional logistic regression models were fit to estimate the odds of postnatal HIV-1 transmission for a 1-unit change in breast milk and plasma immune responses as measured by the ADCC assay, ELISA, and BAMA (Table 6). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were generated. Adjusted logistic regression models were fit separately with each of the following variables identified a priori as potential confounders: maternal viral load (at baseline and closest measure to breast milk sample collection), maternal peripheral CD4+ T cell count (at baseline, and closest measure to breast milk sample collection), AP/PP component randomization, infant age at sample collection, and maternal parity. A potential confounder was included in the final model if it was associated with the outcome and altered the effect estimates, which was only the case for maternal plasma viral load.
TABLE 6

Primary and secondary immune variables used in conditional logistic regression models to assess associations with postnatal HIV-1 transmission

Variable typeImmune responseAssay
Primary immune variablesBreast milk total IgA against HIV-1 B.con env03 gp140, measured by AUCELISA
Breast milk sIgA against HIV-1 B.con env03 gp140, measured by AUCELISA
Breast milk ADCC antibody titer (above and below detection)ADCC-Luc
Secondary immune variablesPlasma total IgA against HIV-1 B.con env03 gp140, measured by AUCELISA
Plasma ADCC antibody titer (above and below detection)ADCC-Luc
Breast milk ADCC potency (maximum % specific killing)ADCC-Luc
Plasma ADCC potency (maximum % specific killing)ADCC-Luc
Plasma Env-specific IgG (against a panel of HIV-1 antigens)BAMA
Breast milk Env-specific IgG (against a panel of HIV-1 antigens)BAMA
Breast milk total IgA (against a panel of HIV-1 antigens)BAMA
Plasma total IgA (against a panel of HIV-1 antigens)BAMA
Breast milk sIgA (against a panel of HIV-1 antigens)BAMA
Primary and secondary immune variables used in conditional logistic regression models to assess associations with postnatal HIV-1 transmission Distribution of values for breast milk and plasma immune responses. aImmune response is dichotomous, with categories of below the LLD and above the LLD. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
  39 in total

1.  Effect of breastfeeding and formula feeding on transmission of HIV-1: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  R Nduati; G John; D Mbori-Ngacha; B Richardson; J Overbaugh; A Mwatha; J Ndinya-Achola; J Bwayo; F E Onyango; J Hughes; J Kreiss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in resource-poor countries: translating research into policy and practice.

Authors:  K M De Cock; M G Fowler; E Mercier; I de Vincenzi; J Saba; E Hoff; D J Alnwick; M Rogers; N Shaffer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Passively acquired antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity in HIV-infected infants is associated with reduced mortality.

Authors:  Caitlin Milligan; Barbra A Richardson; Grace John-Stewart; Ruth Nduati; Julie Overbaugh
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 21.023

4.  Prevention of HIV-1 Transmission Through Breastfeeding: Efficacy and Safety of Maternal Antiretroviral Therapy Versus Infant Nevirapine Prophylaxis for Duration of Breastfeeding in HIV-1-Infected Women With High CD4 Cell Count (IMPAACT PROMISE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Patricia M Flynn; Taha E Taha; Mae Cababasay; Mary Glenn Fowler; Lynne M Mofenson; Maxensia Owor; Susan Fiscus; Lynda Stranix-Chibanda; Anna Coutsoudis; Devasena Gnanashanmugam; Nahida Chakhtoura; Katie McCarthy; Cornelius Mukuzunga; Bonus Makanani; Dhayendre Moodley; Teacler Nematadzira; Bangini Kusakara; Sandesh Patil; Tichaona Vhembo; Raziya Bobat; Blandina T Mmbaga; Maysseb Masenya; Mandisa Nyati; Gerhard Theron; Helen Mulenga; Kevin Butler; David E Shapiro
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Fc gammaRIIIa-158V/F polymorphism influences the binding of IgG by natural killer cell Fc gammaRIIIa, independently of the Fc gammaRIIIa-48L/R/H phenotype.

Authors:  H R Koene; M Kleijer; J Algra; D Roos; A E von dem Borne; M de Haas
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Association of HIV-1 Envelope-Specific Breast Milk IgA Responses with Reduced Risk of Postnatal Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV-1.

Authors:  Justin Pollara; Erin McGuire; Genevieve G Fouda; Wes Rountree; Josh Eudailey; R Glenn Overman; Kelly E Seaton; Aaron Deal; R Whitney Edwards; Gerald Tegha; Deborah Kamwendo; Jacob Kumwenda; Julie A E Nelson; Hua-Xin Liao; Christie Brinkley; Thomas N Denny; Christina Ochsenbauer; Sascha Ellington; Caroline C King; Denise J Jamieson; Charles van der Horst; Athena P Kourtis; Georgia D Tomaras; Guido Ferrari; Sallie R Permar
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Hiv-specific secretory IgA in breast milk of HIV-positive mothers is not associated with protection against HIV transmission among breast-fed infants.

Authors:  Louise Kuhn; Daria Trabattoni; Chipepo Kankasa; Moses Sinkala; Francesca Lissoni; Mrinal Ghosh; Grace Aldrovandi; Don Thea; Mario Clerici
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 8.  Breast-feeding and Transmission of HIV-1.

Authors:  Grace John-Stewart; Dorothy Mbori-Ngacha; Rene Ekpini; Edward N Janoff; John Nkengasong; Jennifer S Read; Phillippe Van de Perre; Marie-Louise Newell
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Infant morbidity, mortality, and breast milk immunologic profiles among breast-feeding HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women in Botswana.

Authors:  Roger L Shapiro; Shahin Lockman; Soyeon Kim; Laura Smeaton; Jeremy T Rahkola; Ibou Thior; Carolyn Wester; Claire Moffat; Peter Arimi; Patrick Ndase; Aida Asmelash; Lisa Stevens; Monty Montano; Joseph Makhema; Max Essex; Edward N Janoff
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Triple-antiretroviral prophylaxis to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission through breastfeeding--the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, Kenya: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Timothy K Thomas; Rose Masaba; Craig B Borkowf; Richard Ndivo; Clement Zeh; Ambrose Misore; Juliana Otieno; Denise Jamieson; Michael C Thigpen; Marc Bulterys; Laurence Slutsker; Kevin M De Cock; Pauli N Amornkul; Alan E Greenberg; Mary Glenn Fowler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  3 in total

1.  Recent insights into Fc-mediated effector responses to HIV-1.

Authors:  Margaret C Carpenter; Margaret E Ackerman
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 2.  Vaccines for Perinatal and Congenital Infections-How Close Are We?

Authors:  Tulika Singh; Claire E Otero; Katherine Li; Sarah M Valencia; Ashley N Nelson; Sallie R Permar
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Pre-existing infant antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity associates with reduced HIV-1 acquisition and lower morbidity.

Authors:  Allison S Thomas; Yvetane Moreau; Wenqing Jiang; John E Isaac; Alexander Ewing; Laura F White; Athena P Kourtis; Manish Sagar
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-10-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.