Literature DB >> 31645144

Evidence, values, and funding decisions in Canadian cancer systems.

Stuart J Peacock1,2,3, Dean A Regier1,2,4, Adam J N Raymakers1,2,3, Kelvin K W Chan1,5,6.   

Abstract

Expenditure on cancer therapies is rising rapidly in many countries, particularly for cancer drugs. In recent years, this has stimulated a global debate among the public, patients, clinicians, decision-makers, and the pharmaceutical industry on value, affordability, and sustainability propositions relating to cancer therapies. In this article, we discuss some recent developments in evidence-based approaches to priority setting and resource allocation in Canadian cancer systems. These developments include new methods for deliberative public engagement, generating and using real-world evidence, multi-criteria decision analysis, and handling uncertainty with evidence for gene therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31645144     DOI: 10.1177/0840470419870831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Manage Forum        ISSN: 0840-4704


  3 in total

1.  How vision and leadership shaped the U.S. National Cancer Institute's 50-year journey to advance the evidence base of cancer control and cancer care delivery research.

Authors:  Arnold D Kaluzny; Donna M O'Brien
Journal:  Health Policy Open       Date:  2020-10-13

2.  Vaccine nationalism will persist: global public goods need effective engagement of global citizens.

Authors:  Stuart J Peacock
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.185

3.  Describing Sources of Uncertainty in Cancer Drug Formulary Priority Setting across Canada.

Authors:  Kristina Jenei; Stuart Peacock; Michael Burgess; Craig Mitton
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.