Literature DB >> 31645076

Incrementally Transforming Electronic Medical Records into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: A Multidimensional Quality Assurance Approach.

Kristine E Lynch1,2, Stephen A Deppen3, Scott L DuVall1,2, Benjamin Viernes1,2, Aize Cao3, Daniel Park4, Elizabeth Hanchrow3, Kushan Hewa3, Peter Greaves3, Michael E Matheny3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development and adoption of health care common data models (CDMs) has addressed some of the logistical challenges of performing research on data generated from disparate health care systems by standardizing data representations and leveraging standardized terminology to express clinical information consistently. However, transforming a data system into a CDM is not a trivial task, and maintaining an operational, enterprise capable CDM that is incrementally updated within a data warehouse is challenging.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a quality assurance (QA) process and code base to accompany our incremental transformation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse health care database into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM to prevent incremental load errors.
METHODS: We designed and implemented a multistage QA) approach centered on completeness, value conformance, and relational conformance data-quality elements. For each element we describe key incremental load challenges, our extract, transform, and load (ETL) solution of data to overcome those challenges, and potential impacts of incremental load failure.
RESULTS: Completeness and value conformance data-quality elements are most affected by incremental changes to the CDW, while updates to source identifiers impact relational conformance. ETL failures surrounding these elements lead to incomplete and inaccurate capture of clinical concepts as well as data fragmentation across patients, providers, and locations.
CONCLUSION: Development of robust QA processes supporting accurate transformation of OMOP and other CDMs from source data is still in evolution, and opportunities exist to extend the existing QA framework and tools used for incremental ETL QA processes. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31645076      PMCID: PMC6811349          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  16 in total

1.  Conversion and Data Quality Assessment of Electronic Health Record Data at a Korean Tertiary Teaching Hospital to a Common Data Model for Distributed Network Research.

Authors:  Dukyong Yoon; Eun Kyoung Ahn; Man Young Park; Soo Yeon Cho; Patrick Ryan; Martijn J Schuemie; Dahye Shin; Hojun Park; Rae Woong Park
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2016-01-31

2.  Creating a Common Data Model for Comparative Effectiveness with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership.

Authors:  F FitzHenry; F S Resnic; S L Robbins; J Denton; L Nookala; D Meeker; L Ohno-Machado; M E Matheny
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Feasibility and utility of applications of the common data model to multiple, disparate observational health databases.

Authors:  Erica A Voss; Rupa Makadia; Amy Matcho; Qianli Ma; Chris Knoll; Martijn Schuemie; Frank J DeFalco; Ajit Londhe; Vivienne Zhu; Patrick B Ryan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Transparent reporting of data quality in distributed data networks.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Jeffrey S Brown; Alein T Chun; Bruce N Davidson; Daniella Meeker; Patrick B Ryan; Lisa M Schilling; Nicole G Weiskopf; Andrew E Williams; Meredith Nahm Zozus
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2015-03-23

5.  Fidelity assessment of a clinical practice research datalink conversion to the OMOP common data model.

Authors:  Amy Matcho; Patrick Ryan; Daniel Fife; Christian Reich
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Transforming the Premier Perspective Hospital Database into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model.

Authors:  Rupa Makadia; Patrick B Ryan
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-11-11

7.  Towards Implementation of OMOP in a German University Hospital Consortium.

Authors:  C Maier; L Lang; H Storf; P Vormstein; R Bieber; J Bernarding; T Herrmann; C Haverkamp; P Horki; J Laufer; F Berger; G Höning; H W Fritsch; J Schüttler; T Ganslandt; H U Prokosch; M Sedlmayr
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse.

Authors:  Nicole G Weiskopf; Suzanne Bakken; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-09-04

9.  Data model harmonization for the All Of Us Research Program: Transforming i2b2 data into the OMOP common data model.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Klann; Matthew A H Joss; Kevin Embree; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Tiffany J Callahan; Juliana Barnard; Alan E Bauck; Jeff Brown; Bruce N Davidson; Hossein Estiri; Carsten Goerg; Erin Holve; Steven G Johnson; Siaw-Teng Liaw; Marianne Hamilton-Lopez; Daniella Meeker; Toan C Ong; Patrick Ryan; Ning Shang; Nicole G Weiskopf; Chunhua Weng; Meredith N Zozus; Lisa Schilling
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-09-11
View more
  16 in total

1.  APOL1 Risk Variants, Acute Kidney Injury, and Death in Participants With African Ancestry Hospitalized With COVID-19 From the Million Veteran Program.

Authors:  Adriana M Hung; Shailja C Shah; Alexander G Bick; Zhihong Yu; Hua-Chang Chen; Christine M Hunt; Frank Wendt; Otis Wilson; Robert A Greevy; Cecilia P Chung; Ayako Suzuki; Yuk-Lam Ho; Elvis Akwo; Renato Polimanti; Jin Zhou; Peter Reaven; Philip S Tsao; J Michael Gaziano; Jennifer E Huffman; Jacob Joseph; Shiuh-Wen Luoh; Sudha Iyengar; Kyong-Mi Chang; Juan P Casas; Michael E Matheny; Christopher J O'Donnell; Kelly Cho; Ran Tao; Katalin Susztak; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Sony Tuteja; Edward D Siew
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Evaluating fitness-for-use of electronic health records in pragmatic clinical trials: reported practices and recommendations.

Authors:  Sudha R Raman; Emily C O'Brien; Bradley G Hammill; Adam J Nelson; Laura J Fish; Lesley H Curtis; Keith Marsolo
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Does Not Significantly Alter Major COVID-19 Outcomes among Veterans.

Authors:  Xiangqin Cui; Julia W Gallini; Christine L Jasien; Michal Mrug
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  Deep-learning-based automated terminology mapping in OMOP-CDM.

Authors:  Byungkon Kang; Jisang Yoon; Ha Young Kim; Sung Jin Jo; Yourim Lee; Hye Jin Kam
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Patient Cohort Identification on Time Series Data Using the OMOP Common Data Model.

Authors:  Christian Maier; Lorenz A Kapsner; Sebastian Mate; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Stefan Kraus
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  EHR-Independent Predictive Decision Support Architecture Based on OMOP.

Authors:  Philipp Unberath; Hans Ulrich Prokosch; Julian Gründner; Marcel Erpenbeck; Christian Maier; Jan Christoph
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Common Problems, Common Data Model Solutions: Evidence Generation for Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Seamus Kent; Edward Burn; Dalia Dawoud; Pall Jonsson; Jens Torup Østby; Nigel Hughes; Peter Rijnbeek; Jacoline C Bouvy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease does not significantly alter major COVID-19 outcomes among veterans.

Authors:  Xiangqin Cui; Julia W Gallini; Christine L Jasien; Michal Mrug
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-11-29

9.  Conceptual Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Generic and Standard-Compliant Data Transfer into Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Rogério Blitz; Martin Dugas
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Baseline phenotype and 30-day outcomes of people tested for COVID-19: an international network cohort including >3.32 million people tested with real-time PCR and >219,000 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in South Korea, Spain and the United States.

Authors:  Asieh Golozar; Lana Yh Lai; Anthony G Sena; David Vizcaya; Lisa M Schilling; Vojtech Huser; Fredrik Nyberg; Scott L Duvall; Daniel R Morales; Thamir M Alshammari; Hamed Abedtash; Waheed-Ul-Rahman Ahmed; Osaid Alser; Heba Alghoul; Ying Zhang; Mengchun Gong; Yin Guan; Carlos Areia; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Karishma Shah; Jennifer C E Lane; Albert Prats-Uribe; Jose D Posada; Nigam H Shah; Vignesh Subbian; Lin Zhang; Maria Tereza Fernandes Abrahão; Peter R Rijnbeek; Seng Chan You; Paula Casajust; Elena Roel; Martina Recalde; Sergio Fernández-Bertolín; Alan Andryc; Jason A Thomas; Adam B Wilcox; Stephen Fortin; Clair Blacketer; Frank DeFalco; Karthik Natarajan; Thomas Falconer; Matthew Spotnitz; Anna Ostropolets; George Hripcsak; Marc Suchard; Kristine E Lynch; Michael E Matheny; Andrew Williams; Christian Reich; Talita Duarte-Salles; Kristin Kostka; Patrick B Ryan; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.