| Literature DB >> 31642247 |
Ross D Uthoff1, Bofan Song1, Sumsum Sunny2,3, Sanjana Patrick4, Amritha Suresh2,3, Trupti Kolur2, Keerthi Gurushanth5, Kimberly Wooten6, Vishal Gupta6, Mary E Platek6,7, Anurag K Singh6, Petra Wilder-Smith8, Moni Abraham Kuriakose2,3, Praveen Birur4,5, Rongguang Liang1.
Abstract
Oral cancer is a growing health issue in low- and middle-income countries due to betel quid, tobacco, and alcohol use and in younger populations of middle- and high-income communities due to the prevalence of human papillomavirus. The described point-of-care, smartphone-based intraoral probe enables autofluorescence imaging and polarized white light imaging in a compact geometry through the use of a USB-connected camera module. The small size and flexible imaging head improves on previous intraoral probe designs and allows imaging the cheek pockets, tonsils, and base of tongue, the areas of greatest risk for both causes of oral cancer. Cloud-based remote specialist and convolutional neural network clinical diagnosis allow for both remote community and home use. The device is characterized and preliminary field-testing data are shared.Entities:
Keywords: autofluorescence imaging; biomedical imaging; mobile health; oral cancer screening
Year: 2019 PMID: 31642247 PMCID: PMC6826203 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.10.106003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.170
Fig. 1Intraoral probe system view showing the handheld probe: (a) overall system size; (b), (c) the flexible head; (d) the imaging and LED illumination apertures, along with the (e) installed smartphone running the custom Android application and (f) installed electronics.
Fig. 2Cross-section images of the system mechanical design highlighting features related to the flexible silicone section. (a) A horizontal section view up to the aluminum stiffener/heatsink (rendered in teal for visibility) demonstrating its shape and position in the probe head. The stiffener is clamped between the two halves of the probe head and, along with the screw capture notches, keeps the two sections of the probe rigidly connected. (b) A vertical section view of the final assembly step, where the green-colored mold for the silicone is clamped around the probe head. The camera PCB and illumination LED PCB flex cables span the flexible section. The LED flex PCB surrounds the camera and is attached to the heatsink with electrically insulating epoxy. (c) A vertical section view of the device after the silicone has been injected into the mold and cured. Here, the silicone and plastic overlap region along with the capture features is visible. The capture features and overlap increase robustness in the joint. After curing, the mold is removed and the silicone/3D-printed plastic interface is reinforced with silicone adhesive.
Fig. 3Image of a 1951 USAF resolution test chart showing (a) the FOV and (b) contrast limit. The zoomed contrast limit image (b) shows group 4–3 is resolvable, a cutoff frequency of . (c) A comparison of the theoretical diffraction limit and measured on-axis MTF performance.
Fig. 4Sample (column a) white light, (column b) autofluorescence, (column c) green luminance subtraction, and (column d) red/green ratio handheld intraoral images with clinical diagnoses of (q) normal/variation, location: floor of the mouth; (r) normal/variation, location: tongue; and (s) OSCC, location: right buccal mucosa.
Fig. 5Sample (column a) white light, (column b) autofluorescence, (column c) green luminance subtraction, and (column d) red/green ratio handheld intraoral images demonstrating the ability to image the BOT.
Comparison of AFI device features and specifications.
| Parameter | This work | Uthoff 2018 | VELscope™ | Identifi® |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usable intraoral length | 135.5 mm | 116.6 mm | Not intraoral | Similar to this work |
| Minimum intraoral cross-sectional area | Not intraoral | Similar to this work | ||
| Maximum intraoral cross-sectional area | Not intraoral | Similar to this work | ||
| Working distance | 20 mm | 10 mm | 80 mm | No camera |
| Depth of field | 12.5 mm | 0.6 mm | No camera | |
| FOV area | No camera | |||
| Flexible joint | Yes | No | Not intraoral | Mirror |
| Accesses BOT | Yes | No | No | Maybe |
| Accesses tonsils and posterior pharynx | Yes | No | Yes | Maybe |
| Native image capture, processing, transmission | Yes | Yes | W/peripheral | No |
| AFI | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PWLI | Yes | WLI | No | WLI |
| Green-amber imaging | No | No | No | Yes |
Fig. 6Comparison of mechanical outlines for (a) the probe proposed in this paper and (b) the previously published probe demonstrating its greatly reduced intraoral dimensions.
Fig. 7Optical design for a 120-deg full FOV, image space lens with increased MTF performance compared to Fig 3. (a) The layout of the optical design with dimensions; (b) provides the theoretical MTF performance.
Prescription for imaging lens with increased FOV and resolution.
| Surface | Material | Radius | Thickness | Conic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object | Air | — | 15.000 | — | — |
| Stop | OKP4HT | −2.520 | 0.3 | — | −0.129 |
| 3 | E48R | 0.833 | 0.6 | — | — |
| 4 | Air | −0.739 | 2.684 | 0.430 | 0.157 |
| Image | — | — | — | — | — |