Grace A Noppert1,2,3, A E Aiello4,5, A M O'Rand6, H J Cohen7,8. 1. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, 123 West Franklin St, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA. gnop@email.unc.edu. 2. Duke University Population Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. gnop@email.unc.edu. 3. Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. gnop@email.unc.edu. 4. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, 123 West Franklin St, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 6. Duke University Population Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 7. Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 8. Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disparities in adult morbidity and mortality may be rooted in patterns of biological dysfunction in early life. We sought to examine the association between pathogen burden and a cumulative deficits index (CDI), conceptualized as a pre-clinical marker of an unhealthy biomarker profile, specifically focusing on patterns across levels of social disadvantage. METHODS: Using the data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004 wave (aged 20-49 years), we examined the association of pathogen burden, composed of seven pathogens, with the CDI. The CDI comprised 28 biomarkers corresponding to available clinical laboratory measures. Models were stratified by race/ethnicity and education level. RESULTS: The CDI ranged from 0.04 to 0.78. Nearly half of Blacks were classified in the high burden pathogen class compared with 8% of Whites. Among both Mexican Americans and other Hispanic groups, the largest proportion of individuals were classified in the common pathogens class. Among educational classes, 19% of those with less than a high school education were classified in the high burden class compared with 7% of those with at least a college education. Blacks in the high burden pathogen class had a CDI 0.05 greater than those in the low burden class (P < 0.05). Whites in the high burden class had a CDI only 0.03 greater than those in the low burden class (P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest there are significant social disparities in the distribution of pathogen burden across race/ethnic groups, and the effects of pathogen burden may be more significant for socially disadvantaged individuals.
BACKGROUND: Disparities in adult morbidity and mortality may be rooted in patterns of biological dysfunction in early life. We sought to examine the association between pathogen burden and a cumulative deficits index (CDI), conceptualized as a pre-clinical marker of an unhealthy biomarker profile, specifically focusing on patterns across levels of social disadvantage. METHODS: Using the data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004 wave (aged 20-49 years), we examined the association of pathogen burden, composed of seven pathogens, with the CDI. The CDI comprised 28 biomarkers corresponding to available clinical laboratory measures. Models were stratified by race/ethnicity and education level. RESULTS: The CDI ranged from 0.04 to 0.78. Nearly half of Blacks were classified in the high burden pathogen class compared with 8% of Whites. Among both Mexican Americans and other Hispanic groups, the largest proportion of individuals were classified in the common pathogens class. Among educational classes, 19% of those with less than a high school education were classified in the high burden class compared with 7% of those with at least a college education. Blacks in the high burden pathogen class had a CDI 0.05 greater than those in the low burden class (P < 0.05). Whites in the high burden class had a CDI only 0.03 greater than those in the low burden class (P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest there are significant social disparities in the distribution of pathogen burden across race/ethnic groups, and the effects of pathogen burden may be more significant for socially disadvantaged individuals.
Authors: Hoda M Malaty; Abdalla El-Kasabany; David Y Graham; Charles C Miller; Sidd G Reddy; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Yoshio Yamaoka; Gerald S Berenson Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-03-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Heidi N Schmaltz; Linda P Fried; Qian-Li Xue; Jeremy Walston; Sean X Leng; Richard D Semba Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Amanda M Simanek; Jennifer Beam Dowd; Graham Pawelec; David Melzer; Ambarish Dutta; Allison E Aiello Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrew W Sylwester; Bridget L Mitchell; John B Edgar; Cara Taormina; Christian Pelte; Franziska Ruchti; Paul R Sleath; Kenneth H Grabstein; Nancy A Hosken; Florian Kern; Jay A Nelson; Louis J Picker Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2005-09-05 Impact factor: 14.307