Literature DB >> 31641972

Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures using the Accelerate Pheno™ system.

Måns Ullberg1,2, Volkan Özenci3,4.   

Abstract

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing remain a crucial step for early efficient therapy of bloodstream infections. Traditional methods require turnaround times of at least 2 days, while rapid procedures are often associated with extended hands-on time. The Accelerate Pheno™ System provides microbial identification results within 90 min and susceptibility data in approximately 7 h directly from positive blood cultures with only few minutes of hands-on time. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the performance of the Accelerate Pheno™ System in identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria directly from clinical blood culture samples. We analyzed 108 and 67 blood culture bottles using the Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit with software version v1.0 and the FDA-cleared version v1.2, respectively. Reliable identification was achieved for Enterobacteriaceae, staphylococci, and enterococci, with 76/80 (95%), 42/46 (91%), and 10/11 (91%) correct identifications. Limitations were observed in the identification of streptococci, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes, and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrobial susceptibility results for Enterobacteriaceae, for amikacin, ertapenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam ranged between 86 and 100% categorical agreement. Using v1.2, results for ceftazidime showed 100% concordance with the reference method. For staphylococci, the overall performance reached 92% using v1.2. Qualitative tests for detection of methicillin or macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance caused major and very major errors for isolates. Overall, the present data show that the Accelerate Pheno™ system can, in combination with Gram stain, be used as a rapid complementation to standard microbial diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31641972     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03703-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  3 in total

1.  Performance of dRAST on Prospective Clinical Blood Culture Samples in a Simulated Clinical Setting and on Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.

Authors:  Alicia Y W Wong; Alexander T A Johnsson; Volkan Özenci
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-03-02

2.  Performance evaluation of the FAST™ System and the FAST-PBC Prep™ cartridges for speeded-up positive blood culture testing.

Authors:  Alexia Verroken; Chaima Hajji; Florian Bressant; Jonathan Couvreur; Ahalieyah Anantharajah; Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel.

Authors:  Tanja Holma; Jukka Torvikoski; Nathalie Friberg; Annika Nevalainen; Eveliina Tarkka; Jenni Antikainen; Jari J Martelin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.267

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.