Literature DB >> 31641832

Letter to the Editor: Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis Following Esophagectomy.

Victor D Plat1, Donald L van der Peet2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID： 31641832     DOI： 10.1007/s00268-019-05244-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN： 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Fady Yanni; Pritam Singh; Nilanjana Tewari; Simon L Parsons; James A Catton; John Duffy; Neil T Welch; Ravinder S Vohra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Deng; Quan-Xing Liu; Dong Zhou; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Akira Kuriyama; Hisashi Noma; Souya Nunobe; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Comparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Quan-Xing Liu; Xu-Feng Deng; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.637
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.