Erratum: Pandemic of Vitamin D Deficiency: Cardiometabolic Concern or Skeletal Biochemical Abnormality?

[This corrects the article on p. 215 in vol. 23, PMID: 31161106.]. Copyright:

In the article titled “Pandemic of Vitamin D deficiency: Cardiometabolic concern or Skeletal biochemical abnormality?”, published on pages 215-21, Issue 2, Volume 23 in Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism[1], the units “pg” was incorrect as “ng” on page 2, Column 2, 45,46,47th line, under Results paragraph.

The median range “42.3” was incorrect as “51.5” on page 4, 29th line under Table 4.

The unit term “pg/ml” was missing and should read as “iPTH level (pg/ml) was” on page 6, Column 1, 42nd line.

The median range (61.5 vs 42.3) was incorrect as (68.16 vs 44.9) on page 6, Column 1, 48th line

The correct statement should be read as

Position	Actual present now	Should be changed to
Page 2, Column 2, Line 45,46,47	The corresponding median (with IQR) of intact PTH level was 42.3ng/ml (IQR 33.675.05), 48 ng/ml (IQR 34.1063.98), 54.7 ng/ml (IQR 36.9581.5) 61.5 ng/ml (IQR 37.587.9) respectively for Vitamin	The corresponding median (with IQR) of intact PTH level was 42.3pg/ml (IQR 33.675.05), 48 pg/ml (IQR 34.1063.98), 54.7 pg/ml (IQR 36.9581.5) 61.5 pg/ml (IQR 37.587.9) respectively for Vitamin
Page 4, Table 4, Line 29,	iPTH (pg/ml) 61.5 37.588.0 51.5 31.374.3 0.005 0.001	iPTH (pg/ml) 61.5 37.588.0 42.3 31.374.3 0.005 0.001
Page 6, Column 1, Line 42	iPTH level was	iPTH level (pg/ml) was
Page 6, Column 1, Line 48	(68.16 vs 44.9)	(61.5 vs 42.3)