| Literature DB >> 31641466 |
Felipe Torquato1, Pedro Range2, Radhouane Ben-Hamadou3, Eva E Sigsgaard1,4, Philip F Thomsen4, Rodrigo Riera5, Michael L Berumen6, John A Burt7, David A Feary8, Alyssa Marshell9, Daniele D'Agostino10, Joseph D DiBattista6,11,12, Peter R Møller1.
Abstract
Ocean circulation, geological history, geographic distance, and seascape heterogeneity play an important role in phylogeography of coral-dependent fishes. Here, we investigate potential genetic population structure within the yellowbar angelfish (Pomacanthus maculosus) across the Northwestern Indian Ocean (NIO). We then discuss our results with respect to the above abiotic features in order to understand the contemporary distribution of genetic diversity of the species. To do so, restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) was utilized to carry out population genetic analyses on P. maculosus sampled throughout the species' distributional range. First, genetic data were correlated to geographic and environmental distances, and tested for isolation-by-distance and isolation-by-environment, respectively, by applying the Mantel test. Secondly, we used distance-based and model-based methods for clustering genetic data. Our results suggest the presence of two putative barriers to dispersal; one off the southern coast of the Arabian Peninsula and the other off northern Somalia, which together create three genetic subdivisions of P. maculosus within the NIO. Around the Arabian Peninsula, one genetic cluster was associated with the Red Sea and the adjacent Gulf of Aden in the west, and another cluster was associated with the Arabian Gulf and the Sea of Oman in the east. Individuals sampled in Kenya represented a third genetic cluster. The geographic locations of genetic discontinuities observed between genetic subdivisions coincide with the presence of substantial upwelling systems, as well as habitat discontinuity. Our findings shed light on the origin and maintenance of genetic patterns in a common coral reef fish inhabiting the NIO, and reinforce the hypothesis that the evolution of marine fish species in this region has likely been shaped by multiple vicariance events.Entities:
Keywords: Pomacanthus maculosus; connectivity; coral reef fish; marine biogeography; phylogeography; seascape genomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31641466 PMCID: PMC6802022 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5622
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Locations of the 27 sampling sites for Pomacanthus maculosus across the Western Indian Ocean
Geographic locations of sampling sites and sample sizes for P. maculosus
| Region | Country | Sampling site | Coordinates | Number of samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gulf of Aden | Djibouti | Maskali | N 11°41′, E 43°08′ | 13 |
| Gulf of Aden | Djibouti | Bay de Ghoubbet | N 11°30′, E 42°40′ | 4 |
| Red Sea | Saudi Arabia | Farasan Island (North of Shuma, Mahama, Abulad Island) | N 16°45′, E 41°36′ | 11 |
| Red Sea | Saudi Arabia | Jazirat Burcan | N 27°54′, E 35°03′ | 1 |
| Red Sea | Saudi Arabia | Gulf of Aqaba | N 28°24′, E 34°44′ | 2 |
| Red Sea | Saudi Arabia | Dolphin Lagoon | N 19°31′, E 39°39′ | 2 |
| Red Sea | Saudi Arabia | North Abu Latt, Saut, S. Sulaym | N 19°57′ E 40°09′ | 9 |
| Red Sea | Saudi Arabia | Al‐Fahal, Om Al Balak, Al Wusul | N 22°13′, E 38°57′ | 10 |
| Red Sea | Saudi Arabia | Middle Reef, Shib Habil, Manila Bay | N 20°07′ E 40°12′ | 10 |
| Red Sea | Saudi Arabia | Abu Shosha | N 22°18′ E 39°02′ | 6 |
| Sea of Oman | Oman | Fahal Island | N 23°40′ E 58°30′ | 13 |
| Arabian Sea | Oman | Masirah Island | N 20°09′, E 58°38′ | 3 |
| Arabian Gulf | Abu Dhabi | Saadiyat | N 24°31′, E 54°26′ | 24 |
| Arabian Gulf | Qatar | Umm Al‐Arshan, Al Rayan Reef, Al Zubara | N 26°31′, E 50°17′ | 34 |
| Africa | Kenya | Lamu | N 2°16′ E 40°54′ | 9 |
Pairwise F ST values (below diagonal) for P. maculosus based on 10,225 SNPs
| Arabian Gulf | Sea of Oman | Gulf of Aden | Red Sea | Eastern Africa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabian Gulf | – | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Sea of Oman | 0.015 | – | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Gulf of Aden | 0.052 | 0.033 | – | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Red Sea | 0.049 | 0.032 | 0.002 | – | 0.001 |
| Eastern Africa | 0.143 | 0.130 | 0.112 | 0.103 | – |
Significance p‐values are showed in the above diagonal.
Pairwise F ST values (below diagonal) for P. maculosus based on 10,225 SNPs
| EAP | WAP | EA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EAP | – | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| WAP | 0.043 | – | 0.001 |
| EA | 0.135 | 0.102 | – |
Significance p‐values are showed in the above diagonal.
Abbreviations: EA, Eastern Africa; EAP, Eastern Arabian Peninsula; WAP, Western Arabian Peninsula.
Figure 2Relationship between pairwise geographic distance and genetic differentiation estimates (F ST/[1 − F ST]) for Pomacathus maculosus in the NIO
Figure 3Principal component analysis based on the 10 environmental variables, dots represent the sampling sites where tissue samples were collected. chl, Chlorophyll; dis oxyg, dissolved oxygen; prim prod, primary productivity; rug, rugosity; SSS, sea surface salinity; SST, sea surface temperature; suf nit, surface nitrate; suf phyt, surface phytoplankton; surf phosf, surface phosphate; surf sil, surface_silicate
Figure 4Population structure estimated by Admixture analysis. The 150 sampled individuals are represented by the vertical lines, which are partitioned into K colored segments that represent the individual's estimated membership fractions in K clusters. 10,225 SNPs
Figure 5Principal component analysis of multilocus genotyped for 150 individuals of Pomacanthus maculosus from the NIO. The color scheme reflects geographic regions. 10,225 SNPs
Figure 6Maximum likelihood tree inferred by TREEMIX with the arrow indicating the migration event, the color represents its weight. 10,225 SNPs
Figure 7Map of the study area showing coral‐reef habitats available in the Western Indian Ocean (red squares)