| Literature DB >> 31641463 |
Jacob J Burkhart1, Emily E Puckett2, Chelsey J Beringer1, Christine N Sholy1, Raymond D Semlitsch1, Lori S Eggert1.
Abstract
AIM: For many endemic species with limited dispersal capacities, the relationship between landscape changes and species distributions is still unclear. We characterized the population structure of the endemic ringed salamander (Ambystoma annulatum) across its distribution in the Central Interior Highlands (CIH) of North America, an area of high species endemism, to infer the ecological and evolutionary history of the species.Entities:
Keywords: Ambystoma annulatum; Ambystomatidae; Caudata; Ouachita Mountains; Ozark Highlands; Urodela; amphibians; biogeography
Year: 2019 PMID: 31641463 PMCID: PMC6802018 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 3.167
Figure 1Known occurrence locations and sampling sites for Ambystoma annulatum within the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) distribution overlaid on a simplified 2011 Land Use, Land Cover layer. “Forest” habitats include broadleaf, mixed, and coniferous forests, and other shrub/scrub land use classes. “Herbaceous” habitats include agricultural fields, prairie, and other herbaceous habitats. Sampling sites are indicated by the large circles
Genetic diversity for Ambystoma annulatum populations using 14 microsatellite loci including sample size (N), mean number of alleles per locus (A), mean rarefied allelic richness (A R), observed (H O) and expected heterozygosity (H E), and inbreeding coefficient (F IS). Cluster membership is based upon STRUCTURE assignments shown in Figure 2
| Population | Abbreviation | Cluster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Louis #1, MO | STL1 | North | 12 | 3.93 | 1.58 | 0.601 | 0.583 | −0.030 |
| St. Charles, MO | STC | North | 45 | 4.14 | 1.54 | 0.524 | 0.543 | 0.035 |
| St. Louis #2, MO | STL2 | North | 37 | 3.93 | 1.56 | 0.505 | 0.556 | 0.093 |
| Warren, MO | WAR | North | 41 | 6.36 | 1.69 | 0.685 | 0.693 | 0.011 |
| Maries, MO | MAR | North | 13 | 2.93 | 1.52 | 0.512 | 0.523 | 0.021 |
| Camden, MO | CAM | North | 37 | 6.71 | 1.69 | 0.656 | 0.688 | 0.047 |
| Pulaski, MO | PUL | North | 57 | 7.17 | 4.76 | 0.718 | 0.721 | 0.005 |
| Shannon, MO | SHA | North | 10 | 4.36 | 3.96 | 0.661 | 0.682 | 0.031 |
| Texas, MO | TEX | North | 24 | 4.50 | 1.54 | 0.536 | 0.540 | 0.008 |
| Dallas, MO | DAL | North | 21 | 6.07 | 1.71 | 0.632 | 0.717 | 0.119 |
| Taney, MO | TAN | North | 28 | 4.86 | 1.67 | 0.628 | 0.669 | 0.062 |
| Stone, AR | STO | South | 10 | 3.86 | 1.55 | 0.493 | 0.550 | 0.105 |
| Madison, AR | MAD | South | 26 | 6.79 | 1.75 | 0.614 | 0.754 | 0.187 |
| Johnson, AR | JON | South | 39 | 5.71 | 1.68 | 0.634 | 0.680 | 0.068 |
| Franklin, AR | FRA | South | 19 | 5.64 | 1.68 | 0.609 | 0.683 | 0.109 |
| Cherokee, OK | CHE | South | 33 | 5.93 | 1.71 | 0.637 | 0.714 | 0.107 |
| Scott, AR | SCO | South | 29 | 6.71 | 1.75 | 0.749 | 0.749 | 0.000 |
| Global ( | 28.29 | 5.27 | 1.96 | 0.611 | 0.650 | 0.058 | ||
| North ( | 29.70 | 5.01 | 2.16 | 0.603 | 0.625 | 0.034 | ||
| South ( | 26.29 | 5.64 | 1.68 | 0.623 | 0.686 | 0.091 |
Figure 2Spatial distribution of genetic cluster assignments for Ambystoma annulatum computed in the program structure overlaid on a simplified 2011 Land Use, Land Cover layer. Admixture coefficients for individual A. annulatum from (a) all sites (as identified in Table 1) and (b) from each of the two supported genetic clusters identified in our full analysis. Spatial arrangement of genetic structure for A. annulatum across its distribution (c). Ellipses color corresponds to the admixture assignment scores from the full analysis (a) and pie colors correspond to admixture assignment scores from the two independent analyses for hierarchical substructure of individuals within each of the two presumed genetic clusters (b)
Pairwise genetic and geographic distance matrix for microsatellite data for Ambystoma annulatum
| STL1 | STC | STL2 | WAR | MAR | CAM | PUL | SHA | TEX | DAL | TAN |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL1 | – | 24.6 | 14.1 | 70.3 | 118.5 | 204.1 | 171.2 | 173.4 | 187.0 | 220.0 | 316.3 | 320.6 | 377.6 | 411.1 | 424.2 | 471.9 | 524.5 |
| STC | 0.026 | – | 12.3 | 49.0 | 112.3 | 195.1 | 168.4 | 181.5 | 193.4 | 211.9 | 318.0 | 330.0 | 378.3 | 416.0 | 427.0 | 469.5 | 529.8 |
| STL2 |
|
| – | 56.2 | 109.8 | 194.4 | 164.4 | 172.8 | 185.4 | 210.7 | 312.1 | 321.0 | 372.9 | 408.8 | 420.6 | 465.6 | 522.5 |
| WAR |
|
|
| – | 84.7 | 157.7 | 142.7 | 176.3 | 184.2 | 175.4 | 296.0 | 323.2 | 353.9 | 398.9 | 405.9 | 439.1 | 512.8 |
| MAR |
|
|
|
| – | 86.4 | 58.2 | 104.0 | 106.9 | 101.6 | 211.3 | 243.8 | 269.6 | 314.5 | 321.2 | 357.7 | 428.3 |
| CAM |
|
|
|
|
| – | 56.3 | 132.5 | 122.5 | 18.3 | 161.1 | 228.2 | 209.6 | 268.8 | 266.4 | 284.1 | 378.5 |
| PUL |
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 77.6 | 70.4 | 62.5 | 153.4 | 195.1 | 211.5 | 257.6 | 263.2 | 301.2 | 371.1 |
| SHA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 18.3 | 134.2 | 153.5 | 148.7 | 215.6 | 239.2 | 255.7 | 318.7 | 351.8 |
| TEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 122.1 | 135.9 | 139.0 | 198.1 | 224.3 | 239.4 | 300.6 | 337.5 |
| DAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 145.5 | 217.7 | 192.2 | 252.9 | 249.3 | 265.8 | 361.7 |
| TAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 104.0 | 62.2 | 107.7 | 109.8 | 166.3 | 219.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 136.9 | 112.8 | 143.8 | 238.9 | 214.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 76.1 | 58.5 | 107.1 | 171.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 37.9 | 142.5 | 114.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 104.6 | 113.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | 166.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – |
Values below the diagonal represent pairwise F ST and bold values represent comparisons that are significantly different at p < .001. Values above the diagonal are the pairwise great circle distances between populations (km). Population names in standard font assign to the northern CIH cluster and populations in italics assign to the southern CIH cluster (Figure 2). Shaded regions represent pairwise distance values between populations from separate genetic clusters.
Summary statistics for variable nucleotide sites within our 776 bp region of Ambystoma annulatum mtDNA (A). Position numbers are relative to the first nucleotide of our aligned sequence. Haplotype A is the reference, and variable sites in other haplotypes are indicated with nucleotides. Dots indicate identical sequences. The number of each haplotype occurring in each sampling location and genetic cluster are indicated in columns at right. Populations are distributed among the northern CIH (OZ‐N) and southern CIH (OZ‐S and OU) microsatellite genetic clusters (Figure 2). Haplotype diversity (h) and nucleotide diversity (π) summarized by population (B)
| Hap. | 5 | 93 | 94 | 137 | 339 | 419 | 592 | OZ‐N | OZ‐S | OU |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | WAR | MAR | PUL | CAM | TEX | TAN | JON | CHE | SCO | LEF | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| A | A | G | C | G | A | A | C | 6 | 8 | – | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | – | – | – | – | 35 |
| B |
|
|
|
|
|
| T | – | – | 9 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10 |
| C |
|
|
|
| G |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| D |
| T |
|
|
|
|
| – | – | – | – | 2 | – | – | 1 | 6 | – | – | 9 |
| E | G |
|
|
|
| G |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5 | – | – | – | 5 |
| F |
|
|
| A |
|
|
| – | – | – | – | – | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | 4 |
| G |
|
|
|
|
| G |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 |
| H | G |
| A |
| G |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| I |
| T |
|
| G |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 |
|
| 6 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 77 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.250 | 0.476 | 0.571 | 0.333 | 0.694 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||||
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.180 | 0.171 | 0.095 | 0.215 | 0.147 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||||
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||||
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||||
Figure 3Spatial arrangement of mtDNA haplotypes by sampling location for Ambystoma annulatum. For each color, the proportion of the pie corresponds to the frequency of the haplotype in that population as outlined in Table 3. Colors correspond to the haplotypes represented in the median‐joining haplotype network, shown in the callout box. Each dash indicates a 1 bp difference between the connected haplotypes. White boundary corresponds to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) species distribution
Estimates (mode and 90% highest posterior density, HPD) of the demographic parameters (scaled effective population size, θ; scaled divergence time, τ, in generations; mutation rate, μ) from the posterior distributions for Ambystoma annulatum
| Parameter | Estimated values | Derived values | RRMISE | RMedAD | Avg. relative bias | Factor 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mode | 90% HPD | Mode | 90% HPD | |||||
|
| 2.19 × 100 | 1.50 × 10–0 to 4.21 × 100 | 4,148 | 2,788–7,973 | 0.569 | 0.285 | 0.0451 | 0.960 |
|
| 4.33 × 100 | 2.58 × 100 to 8.42 × 100 | 8,201 | 4,886–15,947 | 0.380 | 0.195 | 0.3587 | 0.922 |
|
| 7.29 × 10–1 | 4.07 × 10–1 to 3.15 × 100 | 1,381 | 771–5,966 | 0.994 | 0.388 | −0.0321 | 0.850 |
|
| 5.28 × 10–4 | 3.66 × 10–4 to 9.39 × 10–4 | – | – | 0.432 | 0.278 | −0.0588 | 0.918 |
Bias estimates for the root of the relative mean integrated square error (RRMISE), average relative bias, and the factor 2 score of the mode of the posterior distribution are also included.