| Literature DB >> 31641424 |
Xiaoli Huang1, Yang Feng1, Hong Tang2, Guanqing Xiong1, Liangyu Li2, Yucen Yang1, Kaiyu Wang3, Ping Ouyang3, Yi Geng3, Defang Chen1, Shiyong Yang1.
Abstract
Most species of the genus Elizabethkingia are pathogenic to humans and animals, most commonly causing meningitis. However, our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms involved is poor and there have been few pathological studies of Elizabethkingia spp. in animals. To understand the host injury induced by Elizabethkingia spp., we established a model of E. miricola infection in the black-spotted frog (Pelophylax nigromaculatus). The systematic pathology in and oxidative damage in the infection model were investigated. Our results show that recently isolated E. miricola is a bacterium that mainly parasitizes the host brain and that neurogenic organs are the predominant sites of damage. Infection mainly manifested as severe brain abscesses, meningoencephalitis, necrotic spondylitis, and necrotic retinitis. The liver, spleen, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, and lung were also affected to varying degrees, with bacterial necrotic inflammation. P. nigromaculatus also suffered enormous damage to its oxidative system during E. miricola infection, which may have further aggravated its disease state. Our results provide a preliminary reference for the study and treatment of Elizabethkingia spp.-induced neurological diseases in animals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31641424 PMCID: PMC6766677 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6407524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Histopathological assessment. An importance factor (ωIF), ranging from 1 to 3, was assigned to every change (1—minimal pathological importance: the lesion is easily reversible as exposure to irritants ends; 2—moderate pathological importance: the lesion is reversible in most cases if the stressor is neutralized; and 3—marked pathological importance: the lesion is generally irreversible, leading to partial or total loss of the organ function [26]).
| Organ (Org) | Functional unit of the tissue ( | Alteration (alt) | Importance factor ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kidney | Tubule/glomerulus/interstitial tissue | ||
| Liver | Liver tissue/interstitial tissue | Haemorrhage | 1 |
| Heart | Epicardial/myocardium/cardiac chamber | Hyperaemia | |
| Lung | Alveolar/capillaries | Edema | 1 |
| Spleen | Interstitial tissue/sinusoid | Deposition | 1 |
| Muscle | Muscle fiber/connective tissue | Hypertrophy | 1 |
| Brain | Meninges/brain parenchyma | Hyperplasia | 2 |
| Spine | Nerve tissue/muscle tissue/connective tissue | Atrophy | 2 |
| Eye | Retina/cornea | Infiltration | 2 |
| Stomach | Mucosa/smooth muscle layer | Necrosis | 3 |
| Intestinal | Mucosa/lamina propria/smooth muscle layer |
Primers for the variety of genes detected with qPCR.
| Gene | Abbreviation | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | Acc. number |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| F: AACCTGAATATTGCAGAGGAGAAGTAC | XM_018565611.1 |
| R: GCAATCTGAGCTGTAACATCTCCTT | |||
|
| |||
|
|
| F: ATTTCTGGGCTCTGCGTC | MK561295 |
| R: GGTTCATCCTTGGCGTTA | |||
|
| |||
|
|
| F: TGCCGCTGTTCACCTTCCT | MK561296 |
| R: AAGTTCCAGGAGATGTCGTTGC | |||
|
| |||
|
|
| F: GCTGTCGACTTCGCAGAAAGGCA | XM_018556352.1 |
| R: ACCTGTAAGGGTCACGGAAGGCA | |||
|
| |||
|
|
| F: CGTTGATTAAGTCCCTGCCCTT | AB099628.1 |
| R: GCCGATCCGAGGACCTCACTA | |||
Biochemical characteristics of the isolated strains.
| Item | Fy70815 1-3 |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram staining | - | - | ND | ND |
| Mobility | - | - | ND | ND |
| Catalase | + | + | ND | ND |
| Xylose | - | - | - | (+) |
| Fructose | + | + | + | ND |
| Esculin | + | + | + | + |
| Indole | N | N | V | (+) |
| Hydrogen sulfide | - | - | V | - |
| Nitrate | - | - | - | - |
| Ornithine decarboxylase | - | - | ND | ND |
| Lysine decarboxylase | - | - | ND | ND |
| Arginine decarboxylase | - | ND | ND | ND |
| Arginine double hydrolysis | N | - | ND | ND |
| Urease | V | - | ND | ND |
| V-P test | - | - | ND | ND |
| Arabinose | N | N | - | - |
+: positive reaction; -: negative reaction; N: not applicable; V: variable reaction; (+): weak or delayed reaction; ND: not determined.
Figure 1The phylogenetic tree was generated with MEGA 7.0 based on an alignment of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolated strains (fy-70815 1–3) and related species.
Sensitivity of the three isolates to antibiotics.
| Antibiotic | Standard (mm) | Inhibition zone (mm) | Sensitivity range | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistant (R) | Moderate (I) | Sensitive (S) | |||
| Azithromycin | ≤13 | 14—17 | ≥18 | 20 | S |
| Enrofloxacin | ≤14 | 15—17 | ≥18 | 15 | I |
| Neomycin | ≤12 | 13—16 | ≥17 | 11 | R |
| Doxycycline | ≤12 | 13—15 | ≥16 | 6 | R |
| Penicillin | ≤19 | 20—22 | ≥23 | 6 | R |
| Rifampicin | ≤16 | 17—19 | ≥20 | 20 | S |
| Compound neoproxine | ≤10 | 10—16 | ≥16 | 7 | R |
| Cefoxitin | ≤14 | 15—17 | ≥18 | 6 | R |
| Ampicillin | ≤14 | 15—19 | ≥20 | 6 | R |
| Florfenicol | ≤12 | 13—17 | ≥18 | 25 | S |
R: resistant; I: moderately sensitive; S: sensitive.
Figure 2Gross lesions in E. miricola-infected P. nigromaculatus. (a) Head biased to one side; (b) abdomen and thigh swelling; (c) congestion of the lungs, hypoplasia of the ovary; (d) left: normal eyes and right: cataracts; (e) top: normal spine and bottom: rachiocampsis; (f) left: normal thigh and right: redness on frog thigh. (g) Morbidity (%) among P. nigromaculatus during E. miricola infection. (h) Symptom types in frogs of different groups. (i) Survival (%) of P. nigromaculatus during E. miricola infection. P values and hazard ratios (HRs) are relative to the control group.
Figure 3Dynamic systematic pathology of P. nigromaculatus caused by E. miricola infection. (a) Histopathological changes induced by E. miricola (▲: inflammatory cell infiltration; →: necrotic cells; E: edema; C: congestion; H: hyperplasia). (b) Overall health status (total index) of frogs in different groups, based on histopathological lesions. (c) Ultrastructural changes induced by E. miricola (N: nucleus; M: mitochondria; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; L: lysosome). P < 0.05 or ∗∗P < 0 01 represents a significant difference or highly significant difference between groups. Dynamic systematic pathology of P. nigromaculatus caused by E. miricola infection.
Figure 4Organs parasitized by E. miricola in P. nigromaculatus. (a) PCR identification of bacteria in diseased frogs. Up: identification of E. miricola with 16S-rRNA-specific primers; 1: Escherichia coli; 2: Klebsiella pneumoniae; 3: Aeromonas veronii; 4: A. hydrophila; 5: Pseudomonas plecoglossicida; 6: Stenotrophomonas sp. Down: confirmation of strains of P. nigromaculatus in the experimental group. (b) Tissue distribution of E. miricola in P. nigromaculatus. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups.
Figure 5Antioxidation capacity of P. nigromaculatus in different groups. (a–c) Assessment of TAC, SOD, and MDA in P. nigromaculatus in different groups. (d–f) Expression of SOD, CAT, and GPX mRNAs in P. nigromaculatus. P < 0.05 or ∗∗P < 0 01 represents a significant difference or highly significant difference between groups.
Figure 6Systemic infection model of E. miricola against P. nigromaculatus.