| Literature DB >> 31641086 |
Friederike Feldmann1,2, Darwyn Kobasa1,3, Carissa Embury-Hyatt4, Allen Grolla1, Tracy Taylor1, Maki Kiso5, Satoshi Kakugawa5, Jason Gren1, Steven M Jones1,6, Yoshihiro Kawaoka7,8,9, Heinz Feldmann10,2,3.
Abstract
The 1918 influenza virus, subtype H1N1, was the causative agent of the most devastating pandemic in the history of infectious diseases. In vitro studies have confirmed that extreme virulence is an inherent property of this virus. Here, we utilized the macaque model for evaluating the efficacy of oseltamivir phosphate against the fully reconstructed 1918 influenza virus in a highly susceptible and relevant disease model. Our findings demonstrate that oseltamivir phosphate is effective in preventing severe disease in macaques but vulnerable to virus escape through emergence of resistant mutants, especially if given in a treatment regimen. Nevertheless, we conclude that oseltamivir would be highly beneficial to reduce the morbidity and mortality rates caused by a highly pathogenic influenza virus although it would be predicted that resistance would likely emerge with sustained use of the drug.IMPORTANCE Oseltamivir phosphate is used as a first line of defense in the event of an influenza pandemic prior to vaccine administration. Treatment failure through selection and replication of drug-resistant viruses is a known complication in the field and was also demonstrated in our study with spread of resistant 1918 influenza virus in multiple respiratory tissues. This emphasizes the importance of early treatment and the possibility that noncompliance may exacerbate treatment effectiveness. It also demonstrates the importance of implementing combination therapy and vaccination strategies as soon as possible in a pandemic situation.Entities:
Keywords: 1918 influenza virus; drug resistance; oseltamivir; treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31641086 PMCID: PMC6805992 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02059-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1Oseltamivir treatment. (a) Experimental design. Four animals (PRE1 to PRE4) were treated with a single dose of oseltamivir phosphate (150 mg) starting 24 h before infection, 4 animals (POST1 to POST4) were treated with oseltamivir starting 24 h postinfection, and 2 animals (CTRL1 and CTRL2) served as controls and were treated with PBS. Treatment was continued for a total of 5 consecutive days. All animals were challenged with the 1918 influenza virus (total, 7 × 106 PFU) by four different routes. (b) Survival curve. Both controls (CTRL1 and CTRL2) and one posttreated animal (POST1) had to be euthanized on 8 and 9 dpi. All other treated animals developed mild to moderate/severe clinical symptoms but survived. Four untreated controls were added from a separate experiment (historical controls [hCTRL]) (6).
FIG 2Histopathology of oseltamivir-treated animals. (a and b) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of the lungs of oseltamivir-pretreated (a) and -posttreated (b) surviving animals at day 20 postinfection, showing a chronic healing stage of pneumonia with areas of consolidation and thickening of alveolar walls due to infiltration of mononuclear cells and deposition of fibrous tissue. (c and d) The presence of viral antigen was demonstrated using an antibody directed to the viral nucleoprotein and was detectable only at the time of euthanasia in the controls (not shown) and animal POST1, which was euthanized on 9 dpi. Viral nucleoprotein was found in alveolar cells (c) and bronchiolar epithelium (d).
Virus titers in nasal and throat swabs
| Animal ID | Nasal swab/throat swab titers (TCID50) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 6 | Day 8 | Day 10 | Day 14 | |
| CTRL1 | 1.5 × 103/neg | 1.5 × 101/neg | 7.0 × 103/8.8 × 103 | 1 × 104/neg | NA | NA |
| CTRL2 | 1.5 × 103/neg | 1.5 × 102/neg | 1.5 × 101/neg | 1.5 × 101/neg | NA | NA |
| PRE1 | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg |
| PRE2 | neg/neg | 1.5 × 102/neg | neg/1.5 × 101 | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg |
| PRE3 | neg/neg | 1.5 × 101/neg | 1.5 × 101/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg |
| PRE4 | 8 × 101/neg | 1.5 × 102/5 × 100 | neg/3 × 102 | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg |
| POST1 | neg/neg | 7.0 × 102/neg | 1.5 × 102/6.6 × 101 | 1.5 × 101/6.6 × 101 | NA | NA |
| POST2 | 1.5 × 101/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg |
| POST3 | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg |
| POST4 | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg | neg/neg |
Virus titers were determined using a TCID50 assay as described in Materials and Methods; CTRL, control animal; ID, identifier; neg, negative; PRE, pretreated animal; POST, posttreated animal; NA, not applicable (animal already euthanized).
Mutations occurring in animal POST1 under oseltamivir treatment
| Tissue | Analysis | % of sequence showing mutations (no. of plaques showing mutations/total no. of plaques analyzed) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | HA | HA | HA | HA | ||
| Nasal mucosa | Plaque | 100 (20/20) | 0 (0/20) | NT | NT | NT |
| Trachea | PCR | 100 (5/5) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 75 (3/4) | 25 (1/4) |
| Right bronchus | PCR | 100 (2/2) | 75 (3/4) | 0 (wt) | 25 (1/4) | 0 (wt) |
| Left bronchus | PCR | 100 (3/3) | 75 (wt) (3/4) | 25 (1/4) | 25 (1/4) | 75 (wt) (3/4) |
| Right lung upper | PCR | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) |
| Right lung middle | PCR | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) |
| Right lung caudal | Plaque | 100 (20/20) | 85 (17/20) | 15 (3/20) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) |
| Left lung upper | PCR | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) |
| Left lung middle | PCR | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) |
| Left lung caudal | PCR | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) | 0 (wt) |
Plaque, virus isolation by plaque assay and subsequent direct sequence determination; PCR, RT-PCR of total RNA isolated from the specimen followed by molecular cloning and sequence determination (2 to 6 individual clones each); NT, not tested; wt, wild-type sequence.