| Literature DB >> 31640743 |
Mohammad Nazmul Hasan1, Farah Sabrin1, Begum Rokeya2, Md Shahinul Haque Khan3, Mahtab Uddin Ahmed4, Abel Matondo5, Md Morsaline Billah6, Salima Akter7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent epidemiological and experimental studies suggest that cadmium and diabetes-related hyperglycemia may act synergistically to worsen metabolic regulation. The present study aims to evaluate the potential effects of Enhydra fluctuans extract in diabetes and dyslipidemia in cadmium (CdCl2) induced- normal and type 2 diabetic model rats.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium toxicity; Dyslipidemia; Enhydra fluctuans; Hyperglycemia; Type 2 diabetes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31640743 PMCID: PMC6805336 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-019-2667-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Effects of E. fluctuans extract on glycemic levels in the study groups
| Parameter | N-C | N-Cd | N-P | N-PCd | DM-P | DMP-Cd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mM) | ||||||
| Day 0 | 5.59 ± 0.87 | 6.75 ± 1.19 | 6.37 ± 0.69 | 6.71 ± 0.97 | 7.80 ± 0.44 | 8.22 ± 0.83 |
| Day 21 | 6.04 ± 0.91 | 6.75 ± 0.74 | 6.31 ± 1.18 | 6.24 ± 0.92* | 6.70 ± 0.41 ** | 6.74 ± 1.45 * |
Results are expressed as Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis within groups was done using paired t-test. SD Standard deviation, N-C Normal Control, N-Cd Normal treated with CdCl2, N-P Normal treated with plant extract; N-PCd Normal treated with both plant extract and CdCl2, DM-P Diabetic treated with plant extract, DM-PCd Diabetic treated with both plant extract and CdCl2. *, ** and *** indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and < 0.001) level from a paired t-test
Comparison of glycemic status before and after E. fluctuans treatments
| Group | Before Treatment | After Treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSG (mM) | Mean difference ± SE | F ratio | FSG (mM) | Mean difference ± SE | F ratio | ||
| N-C | 5.59 ± 0.87 | 7.841 ( | 6.04 ± 0.91 | 0.647 ( | |||
| N-Cd | 6.75 ± 1.19 | 1.16 ± 0.47 | 0.072 | 6.75 ± 0.74 | 0.71 ± 0.53 | ||
| N-P | 6.37 ± 0.69 | 0.79 ± 0.43 | 0.270 | 6.31 ± 1.18 | 0.28 ± 0.49 | ||
| N-PCd | 6.71 ± 0.98 | 1.13 ± 0.45 | 0.067 | 6.24 ± 0.92 | 0.21 ± 0.51 | ||
| DM-P | 7.80 ± 0.44 | 2.20 ± 0.47 | < 0.001*** | 6.70 ± 0.41 | 0.66 ± 0.53 | ||
| DMP-Cd | 8.22 ± 0.83 | 2.63 ± 0.49 | < 0.001*** | 6.74 ± 1.45 | 0.70 ± 0.56 | ||
Results are expressed as Mean ± SD and Mean difference ± SE. Mean differences were calculated in comparison to Control group (N-C). SD Standard deviation, SE Standard error of mean, FSG Fasting serum glucose. *** indicates statistically significant (p < 0.001) level from one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test
Effects of E. fluctuans on lipid profile and atherogenic index in the study subjects
| Para-meters | Days | N-C | N-Cd | N-P | N-PCd | DM-P | DMP-Cd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chol (mg/dl) | 0 day | 75 ± 19 | 72 ± 18 | 76 ± 18 | 73 ± 15 | 75 ± 15 | 75 ± 10 |
| 21 day | 67 ± 8 | 75 ± 8 | 68 ± 7 | 68 ± 15 | 84 ± 12 | 73 ± 13 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 0 day | 58 ± 18 | 57 ± 15 | 55 ± 13 | 62 ± 21 | 53 ± 5 | 83 ± 12 |
| 21 day | 51 ± 8 | 50 ± 12 | 48 ± 18 | 61 ± 18 | 56 ± 10 | 56 ± 12 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 0 day | 65 ± 15 | 64 ± 16 | 59 ± 9 | 65 ± 17 | 67 ± 14 | 58 ± 4 |
| 21 day | 65 ± 11 | 70 ± 7 | 64 ± 7 | 63 ± 15 | 78 ± 10 | 68 ± 13 | |
| TG/HDL-C ratio | 0 day | 0.75 (0.49–2.38) | 0.84(0.62–1.41) | 0.89(0.74–1.24) | 0.90(0.59–1.92) | 0.83(0.66–0.98) | 1.57(1.07–1.64) |
| 21 day | 0.74(0.60–1.15) | 0.65(0.60–1.12) | 0.66(0.48–1.27)* | 0.82(0.62–1.89) | 0.74(0.47–0.96) | 0.81(0.63–1.08)* |
Results are expressed as Mean ± SD or Median (range) as appropriate. Statistical analysis within groups was done using paired t-test and WilCoxon rank sum test. SD, Standard deviation; * and ** indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) levels from a paired t-test
Effects of E. fluctuans and cadmium on body weight, liver and kidney function
| Parameters | Days | N-C | N-Cd | N-P | N-PCd | DM-P | DM-PCd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (g) | 0 day | 225 ± 14 | 223 ± 10 | 226 ± 13 | 234 ± 14 | 231 ± 13 | 220 ± 16 |
| 21 day | 217 ± 16 | 203 ± 10** | 221 ± 19 | 201 ± 25** | 221 ± 10 | 187 ± 24** | |
| SGPT (mg/dl) | 0 day | 58 ± 19 | 59 ± 8 | 53 ± 10 | 73 ± 29 | 72 ± 40 | 62 ± 13 |
| 21 day | 75 ± 15 | 106 ± 39* | 69 ± 21 | 123 ± 37*** | 87 ± 33 | 68 ± 13 | |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0 day | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.10 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.15 |
| 21 day | 0.59 ± 0.08 | 0.60 ± 0.09* | 0.58 ± 0.07 | 0.63 ± 0.07 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.46 ± 0.05 |
Results are expressed as Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis within groups was done using paired t-test. SD, Standard deviation; *, ** and *** indicate statistically significant (p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) levels from a paired t-test
The association of fasting serum glucose, SGPT and TG/HDL ratio in the study groups
| Groups | FSG vs SGPT | SGPT vs TG/HDL ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 (r) | Day 21 (r) | Day 0 (r) | Day 21 (r) | |
| Merged group | + 0.121 | + 0.313a | + 0.056 | + 0.410b |
| N-C | −0.459 | + 0.569 | −0.100 | −0.291 |
| N-Cd | + 0.188 | + 0.728 | −0.113 | −0.675 |
| N-P | −0.464 | + 0.351 | + 0.498 | + 0.836a |
| N-PCd | + 0.755a | + 0.404 | + 0.277 | + 0.681 |
| DM-P | −0.592 | + 0.920b | + 0.314 | + 0.882a |
| DM-PCd | −0.188 | −0.179 | + 0.122 | − 0.339 |
r, Correlation coefficient; a and b indicate significance at 0.05 and 0.01 levels (2-tailed)
Fig. 1Histopathological observation of liver samples. a N-C group showed normal arrangement of hepatocytes and sinusoids (Green arrow) (H&E ×20); b N-Cd group showed infiltration of the portal tract with inflammatory cells (Red arrow), vacuolation of liver cell (Blue arrow), hydropic degeneration (Black arrow), nuclear pyknosis and karyorrhexis (Yellow arrow), and fibrosis (White arrow) (H&E ×40); c N-P group showed hepatocytes with regular and large spheroidal nucleus (Green arrow), normal sinusoids (Green arrow), mild inflammatory cells (Red arrow) and low fat deposition (White arrow) (H&E × 20); d N-PCd group showed some normal hepatocytes with central vein (Green arrow), less inflammation (Red arrow), fatty changes and fibrosis (White arrow), karyorrhexis and karyolysis (Yellow arrow) (H&E × 40); e DM-P group showed normal appearance of hepatocytes (Green arrow), mild inflammation (Red arrow), fibrosis (White arrow) and nuclear pyknosis (Yellow arrow) (H&E x 40); f DM-PCd group showed restoration of hepatocytes (Green arrow), karyorrhexis and karyolysis (Yellow arrow), reduced both inflammation (Red arrow) and fatty changes (White arrow) (H&E × 40)
Fig. 2Histopathological observation of heart samples. Histopathological observation of heart in the study groups a N-C group showed normal myocardial fibers with membrane integrity (Green arrow) (H&E × 20); b N-Cd group showed inflammation (Red arrow), severe loss of myocardial fibers and hyalinization (Yellow arrow), and fatty changes (White arrow) (H&E × 20); c N-P group showed normal myocytes (Green arrow), mild inflammation (Red arrow) and low fat deposition (White arrow) (H&E × 40); d N-PCd group showed inflammation (Red arrow), less irregularity of myofibrils (Yellow arrow), fat deposition (White arrow), nuclear pyknosis and necrosis (Blue arrow) (H&E × 20); e DM-P group showed mild inflammation (Red arrow) including fatty changes (White arrow), and normal myocardial fibers (Green arrow) (H&E × 20); f DM-PCd group showed less inflammatory cells (Red arrow), vacuolization of cytoplasm (Black arrow), myocardial fibers loss (Yellow arrow), steatosis (White arrow) and less necrosis (Blue arrow) (H&E × 20)