| Literature DB >> 31640685 |
Ahmed Gharbi1,2, Ali Hamila3, Adel Bouguezzi4, Azza Dandana5, Salima Ferchichi5, Fatiha Chandad6, Leila Guezguez7, Abdelhedi Miled5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress is involved in many diseases including diabetes and cancer. Numbers of studies have suggested its involvement in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of biochemical parameters and oxidative stress markers in plasma of healthy and chronic periodontitis patients.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; GR; Oxidative stress; Periodontal disease; Periodontitis; TOAC
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31640685 PMCID: PMC6805394 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0912-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Comparison of clinical periodontal parameters among the groups
| Groups | Patients | Controls |
| 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | ||||
| PPD (mm) | 5.3 (2.5 to 7.5) | 1 (0.5 to 2) | 0.05 | 4.99–0.70 |
| GBI | 1.96 (0 to 3) | 0.75 (0 to 1) | 0.05 | 2.38–0.67 |
| PI | 64.4 (10 to 100) | 35 (10 to 100) | 0.05 | 65.81–34.71 |
Patients n = 80; Controls n = 50. Normally distributed data are expressed as means±SD, and non normally distributed data are expressed as median (IQR [interquartile range]). PPD Probing pocket depth, GBI Gingival bleeding index, PI Plaque index. The difference is significant compared with the control group (P ≤ 0.05)
Comparison of plasma concentrations of CT, LDLc, TG and HDLc levels among the groups
| Groups | Patients | Controls |
| 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Values | ||||
| Plasma TC (mmol/l) | 4.75 ± 1.10 | 4.2 ± 0.86 | 0.02 | 4.40–4.73 |
| Plasma LDLc (mmol/l) | 2.3 ± 0.72 | 2.08 ± 0.86 | 0.05 | 2.30–2.57 |
| Plasma TG (mmol/l) | 1.4 ± 0.91 | 1.1 ± 0.56 | 0.05 | 1.19–1.42 |
| Plasma HDLc (mmol/l) | 1.3 ± 0.41 | 1.41 ± 0.43 | 0.03 | 1.14–1.28 |
Patients, n = 80; Controls, n = 50. Normally distributed data are expressed as means±SD, and non normally distributed data are expressed as median (IQR [interquartile range]). CT Cholesterol, LDLc Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG Triglycerides, HDLc High-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The difference is significant compared with the control group (P ≤ 0.05)
Comparison of creatinine, uric acid, glucose and urea in plasma among the groups
| Groups | Patients | Controls | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Values | ||||
| Plasma creatinine (μmol/l) | 64.93 ± 15.25 | 66.62 ± 10.35 | 0.13 | 63.62–67.97 |
| Plasma Uric Acid (mmol/l) | 310.37 ± 53.86 | 245.82 ± 66 | 0.05 | 275.35–295.66 |
| Plasma Glucose (mmol/l) | 4.8 ± 1 | 3.9 ± 0.80 | 0.05 | 4.41–4.67 |
| Plasma Urea (μmol/l) | 4.60 ± 1.36 | 5.06 ± 0.56 | 0.31 | 4.40–4.89 |
Patients, n = 80; Controls, n = 50. Normally distributed data are expressed as means±SD, and non normally distributed data are expressed as median (IQR [interquartile range]).The difference is significant compared with the control group (P ≤ 0.05)
Comparison of the activities of enzymatic antioxidants (Catalase, GR and TAOC) in plasma among the groups
| Groups | Patients | Controls | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Values | ||||
| Plasma catalase (ku/l) | 1.95 ± 0.40 | 13.38 ± 10 | 0.001 | 5.49–8.46 |
| Plasma GR (nmol/min/ml) | 28.55 ± 10.79 | 48.72 ± 8.02 | 0.001 | 33.91–38.72 |
| Plasma TAOC (mM trolox equivalent) | 2427 ± 520.31 | 4192 ± 465 | 0.002 | 2933.42–3279.01 |
Patients, n = 80; Controls, n = 50. Normally distributed data are expressed as means±SD, and non normally distributed data are expressed as median (IQR [interquartile range]). GR Glutathione reductase, TAOC Total antioxidant capacity. The difference is significant compared with the control group (P ≤ 0.05)