| Literature DB >> 31640555 |
Jin Li1, Cheng Zheng1, Zhi-Rui Liu2, Jun Ma1, Ge Jin1, Wei-Qian Lin1, Yao-Yao Wang1, Jia-Feng Lin3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) arising from the origin above pulmonary valve lack comprehensive investigation. This study aimed to disclose the characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) outcomes for those VAs.Entities:
Keywords: ECG characteristics; Electrophysiological characteristics; PSCs and MSPA; Radiofrequency catheter ablation; Ventricular arrhythmias
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31640555 PMCID: PMC6805441 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1220-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Basic clinical data of patients
| Basic Clinic Data | Total ( | MSPA ( | PSCs ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Y) | 45.99 ± 13.66 | 44.51 ± 13.61 | 46.60 ± 13.29 | > 0.05 |
| Sex (Male) | 32 | 10 (32.25) | 22 (30.14) | > 0.05 |
| Smoking | 11 | 3 (9.68) | 8 (10.95) | > 0.05 |
| Hypertension | 11 | 3 (9.68) | 8 (10.95) | > 0.05 |
| Diabetes | 9 | 3 (9.68) | 6 (8.22) | > 0.05 |
| Arrhythmias (PVCs) | 89 | 26 (83.87) | 63 (84.00) | > 0.05 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 44.20 ± 7.05 | 46.08 ± 7.81 | 43.43 ± 6.61 | > 0.05 |
| LVEF (%) | 62.37 ± 6.57 | 61.45 ± 7.15 | 62.76 ± 6.33 | > 0.05 |
| Counts/24 h | 21,318.00 ± 7262.01 | 24,602.52 ± 7833.80 | 19,960.46 ± 6600.23 | > 0.05 |
| Disease course (Y) | 3.15 ± 1.07 | 3.04 ± 1.07 | 3.19 ± 1.08 | > 0.05 |
Electrophysiology study and Radiofrequency catheter ablation of VAs arising from MSPA and PSCs
| Total ( | MSPA ( | PSCs ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary artery potential | 18 (17.0%) | 4 (12.9%) | 14 (18.7%) | > 0.05 |
| QS morphology in unipolar electrogram | 106 (100%) | 31 (100%) | 75 (100%) | > 0.05 |
| With notch in descending limb | 41 (38.7%) | 11 (35.5%) | 30 (40%) | > 0.05 |
| Farfield atrial potential of target site in bipolar electrogram | 63 (59.4%) | 18 (58.1%) | 45 (60.0%) | > 0.05 |
| Merged or discrete potential of peak or split morphology of target site in bipolar electrogram | 69 (65.1%) | 20 (64.5%) | 49 (65.3%) | > 0.05 |
| Reversed polarity of bipolar electrograms | 53 (50.0%) | 15 (48.4%) | 38 (50.7%) | > 0.05 |
| Application of temperature-controlled catheter | 34 (32.1%) | 26 (83.87) | 9 (13.0) | < 0.001 |
| Application of irrigated-tip catheter | 71 (67.0%) | 5 (16.13) | 66 (87.00) | < 0.05 |
| V-QRS (ms) | −34.71 ± 4.26 | −35.62 ± 6.79 | −34.78 ± 3.75 | > 0.05 |
| Pace match of target site (lead) | 11.16 ± 0.90 | 11.34 ± 0.52 | 11.08 ± 0.90 | < 0.05 |
| Pacing target site induced good pace match | 95 (89.6%) | 25 (80.7%) | 70 (93.3%) | > 0.05 |
| 12-lead match | 40 (37.7%) | 10 (32.3%) | 30 (40.0%) | > 0.05 |
| 11-lead match | 33 (31.1%) | 9 (29.0%) | 24 (32.0%) | > 0.05 |
| 10-lead match | 22 (20.8%) | 6 (19.4%) | 16 (21.3%) | > 0.05 |
| Application of R0 Swartz sheath | 73 (68.9%) | 2 (6.45%) | 71 (94.67) | < 0.001 |
| Procedural time (min) | 54.28 ± 13.63 | 65.24 ± 17.26 | 46.28 ± 9.30 | < 0.001 |
| Fluoroscopic time (min) | 8.07 ± 2.93 | 9.31 ± 3.16 | 7.19 ± 2.77 | < 0.05 |
| Lesions of energy application | 2.76 ± 1.89 | 3.89 ± 2.59 | 2.20 ± 0.79 | < 0.001 |
| Energy delivery duration (s) | 243.86 ± 88.40 | 335.32 ± 72.11 | 210.76 ± 65.80 | < 0.001 |
| Success of ablation | 106 (100%) | 31 (100.00) | 75 (100.00) | > 0.05 |
| Response of energy application on target site | ||||
| PVC/VT disappeared immediately | 95 (89.6%) | 27 (87.10) | 68 (90.67) | > 0.05 |
| PVC accelerated or decelerated prior to disappearance | 11 (10.4%) | 4 (12.90) | 7 (10.72) | > 0.05 |
Fig. 1Radiofrequency catheter ablation of PVCs rising from MSPA 16 mm above PLC. a ECG of the PVCs. The PVCs exhibited a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology and inferior axis deviation, r morphology in lead I, QS morphology in both aVL and aVR with QSaVR>QS aVL, rS pattern in lead V1-V2, R morphology in lead II, III, aVF and V4-V6 with an ascending notch, precordial transition zone between lead V2-V3. High R wave was recorded in inferior leads with an average amplitude more than 3.0 mV. b Activation mapping of the PVCs. Activation mapping in MSPA above PLC showed a local ventricular activation with initial discrete potential preceding the QRS onset by 32 ms. c Pace mapping of the target site. Pacing mapping performed on the site with earliest ventricular activation showed an excellent pace match between paced QRS and clinical PVCs. d PVCs disappeared after energy application on target site for 6 s. e, f Left anterior oblique projection of the target site (the tip of the catheter). g Right anterior oblique projection of the target site (the tip of the catheter)
Fig. 2Radiofrequency catheter ablation of PVCs rising from PAC. a Activation mapping of PVCs in the PAC. The PVCs exhibited a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology and inferior axis deviation, rs morphology in lead I, QS morphology in both aVL and aVR with QSaVL>QS aVR, rS pattern in lead V1-V2, R morphology in lead II, III and aVF and V4-V6, precordial transition zone between lead V2-V3. Activation mapping showed local ventricular activation with initial discrete peak potential preceding the QRS onset by 37 ms. b Pace mapping showed a 11-lead match between paced QRS and clinical PVCs. c Angiograph of pulmonary artery prior to ablation showed the tip of ablation catheter located in anterior PSCs. Energy application in PAC led to instant elimination of PVCs. The PVCs could not be induced by further isoproterenol administration combined with programmed electrical stimulation. No recurrence was reported during the follow-up of 2 years
ECG characteristics comparison between VAs arising from MPSA and from PSCs
| Origin | MPSA ( | PSCs ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RII (mV) | 2.32 ± 0.52 | 1.81 ± 0.58 | < 0.05 |
| RIII (mV) | 2.36 ± 0.65 | 1.69 ± 0.55 | < 0.05 |
| RaVF (mV) | 2.34 ± 0.58 | 1.74 ± 0.56 | < 0.05 |
| RII+ RIII+ RaVF (mV) | 6.76 ± 1.38 | 4.62 ± 1.04 | < 0.05 |
| V1 R/S | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | > 0.05 |
| V2 R/S | 0.31 ± 0.12 | 0.35 ± 0.07 | > 0.05 |
| Precordial transition zone | |||
| < V3 | 7 (22.58%) | 15 (20.00%) | > 0.05 |
| = V3 | 15 (48.39%) | 36 (48.00%) | > 0.05 |
| > V3 | 9 (29.03%) | 24 (32.00%) | > 0.05 |
| Precordial transition index | |||
| > 0 | 12 (38.71%) | 26 (34.67%) | > 0.05 |
| = 0 | 16 (51.61%) | 40 (53.33%) | > 0.05 |
| < 0 | 3 (9.67%) | 9 (12.00%) | > 0.05 |
The ECG characteristics of VAs arising from each PSC and its corresponding MSPA
| Anterior PSC and corresponding MSPA (PAC-AMSPA, 38cases) | Left PSC and corresponding MSPA | Right PSC and corresponding MSPA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead I | QS、qs、rs、qr. or r pattern | rs or r pattern | R pattern |
| Lead II, III and aVF | R pattern, ascending limb notch or peak notch may be seen | R pattern, ascending limb notch or peak notch may be seen | R pattern, descending limb notch may be seen |
| Lead aVR and a VL | QS, QSaVL>QSaVR | QS, QSaVR>QSaVL | main QS, a minority of qs or qR, QSaVR>QSaVl |
| Lead V1-V2 | rS or RS | rS or RS | rS or RS |
| Lead V3 | rS, RS or Rs | rS, RS or Rs | rS |
| Lead V4 | R or Rs | R or Rs | Rs or R |
| Lead V5-V6 | R pattern, ascending limb notch or peak notch may be seen | R pattern, ascending limb notch or peak notch may be seen | R pattern, descending limb notch may be seen |
| R I (mV) | −0.12 ± 0.11#^ | 0.36 ± 0.13 | 0.41 ± 0.18 |
| RII (mV) | 1.92 ± 0.48 | 1.83 ± 0.38 | 1.45 ± 0.41*# |
| RIII (mV) | 2.04 ± 0.49#^ | 1.52 ± 0.42*^ | 1.11 ± 0.39*# |
| RaVF (mV) | 1.96 ± 0.47#^ | 1.67 ± 0.39*^ | 1.27 ± 0.41*# |
| RII + III + aVF (mV) | 6.02 ± 1.45#^ | 5.13 ± 1.32*^ | 3.94 ± 1.01*# |
| QSaVR (mV) | −0.96 ± 0.22 | −1.05 ± 0.36 | − 0.92 ± 0.39 |
| QSaVL (mV) | −1.07 ± 0.26#^ | −0.61 ± 0.32*^ | − 0.33 ± 0.28*# |
| QSaVR/aVL | 0.89 ± 0.23#^ | 1.72 ± 1.32*^ | 2.79 ± 2.57*# |
| RV1(mV) | 0.28 ± 0.13 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | 0.36 ± 0.22 |
| RV2(mV) | 0.35 ± 0.17 | 0.55 ± 0.22*^ | 0.42 ± 0.24 |
| RV3(mV) | 0.63 ± 0.31 | 0.89 ± 0.37*^ | 0.66 ± 0.33 |
| RV4(mV) | 1.28 ± 0.52 | 1.39 ± 0.51 | 0.99 ± 0.41*# |
| RV5(mV) | 1.79 ± 0.53 | 1.68 ± 0.51 | 1.38 ± 0.54*# |
| RV6(mV) | 1.72 ± 0.43 | 1.67 ± 0.53 | 1.36 ± 0.49*# |
| RV4 + V5 + V6(mV) | 4.79 ± 1.32 | 4.74 ± 1.68 | 3.73 ± 0.82*# |
*Compared with PAC-AMSPA, p < 0.05
#Compared with PLC-LMSPA, p < 0.05
^Compared with PRC-RMSPA, p < 0.05
Fig. 3PLC-LMSPA, PAC-AMSPA and PRC-RMSPA anatomy. Pulmonary arteriography, three-dimension mapping and RVOT anatomy revealed that the PLC-LMSPA is situated at the lowest level above the posterior septum of the RVOT, the PAC-AMSPA situated relatively superior above the anterior septum of RVOT and PRC-RMSPA situated at the most rightward above the free wall of RVOT